bug#57762: dragon-drop package's binary is missing
14 de septiembre de 2022, 5:07, "bdju" escribió: > > On Tue Sep 13, 2022 at 6:55 AM CDT, bdju wrote: > > > > > On Mon Sep 12, 2022 at 10:32 PM CDT, bdju via Bug reports for GNU Guix > > wrote: > > After upgrades I no longer have the `dragon` command that is used by the > > dragon-drop package, making the program unusable. The package is still > > in my manifest file that I applied, still shows up in a search, and I > > also tried to manually `guix install` it again. No luck. > > > > I use this in a lot of scripts due to gtk file pickers crashing software > > for me a lot and trying to avoid them. A fix would be very much > > appreciated. > > > > I found that doing the following: > > find $(guix build dragon-drop) > > > > revealed that `dragon` is inside .../bin/bin instead of just /bin. > > Perhaps this could cause issues with setting the PATH properly. > > > > I did a rollback until dragon worked again, then did a whereis on it > output shows just one bin dir and not two > /gnu/store/njlv1a4b1pvcs42dy0wwgcxr6cx2wf55-profile/bin/dragon > > Hopefully this info helps someone figure out the problem. > Hello, I did this part to solve this problem, but they still do not approve it: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57761 >From 7b4913915bb174c53a7c09455251317af6a3f2ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: arkhan Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 21:45:05 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] gnu: dragon-drop: Fix build prefix * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (dragon-drop): Fix prefix --- gnu/packages/gtk.scm | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm b/gnu/packages/gtk.scm index 4beaebf64a..488d1fb836 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gtk.scm @@ -2586,8 +2586,7 @@ (define-public dragon-drop #:make-flags (list (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target)) ;; makefile uses PREFIX for the binary location -(string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out") - "/bin")) +(string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out"))) #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases (delete 'configure; no configure script -- 2.37.3
bug#57762: dragon-drop package's binary is missing
On Tue Sep 13, 2022 at 6:55 AM CDT, bdju wrote: > On Mon Sep 12, 2022 at 10:32 PM CDT, bdju via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > > After upgrades I no longer have the `dragon` command that is used by the > > dragon-drop package, making the program unusable. The package is still > > in my manifest file that I applied, still shows up in a search, and I > > also tried to manually `guix install` it again. No luck. > > > > I use this in a lot of scripts due to gtk file pickers crashing software > > for me a lot and trying to avoid them. A fix would be very much > > appreciated. > > I found that doing the following: > find $(guix build dragon-drop) > > revealed that `dragon` is inside .../bin/bin instead of just /bin. > Perhaps this could cause issues with setting the PATH properly. I did a rollback until dragon worked again, then did a whereis on it output shows just one bin dir and not two /gnu/store/njlv1a4b1pvcs42dy0wwgcxr6cx2wf55-profile/bin/dragon Hopefully this info helps someone figure out the problem.
bug#57762: dragon-drop package's binary is missing
On Mon Sep 12, 2022 at 10:32 PM CDT, bdju via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > After upgrades I no longer have the `dragon` command that is used by the > dragon-drop package, making the program unusable. The package is still > in my manifest file that I applied, still shows up in a search, and I > also tried to manually `guix install` it again. No luck. > > I use this in a lot of scripts due to gtk file pickers crashing software > for me a lot and trying to avoid them. A fix would be very much > appreciated. I found that doing the following: find $(guix build dragon-drop) revealed that `dragon` is inside .../bin/bin instead of just /bin. Perhaps this could cause issues with setting the PATH properly.
bug#57762: dragon-drop package's binary is missing
After upgrades I no longer have the `dragon` command that is used by the dragon-drop package, making the program unusable. The package is still in my manifest file that I applied, still shows up in a search, and I also tried to manually `guix install` it again. No luck. I use this in a lot of scripts due to gtk file pickers crashing software for me a lot and trying to avoid them. A fix would be very much appreciated.
