bug#59185: Trouble mounting recursive file systems in containers

2022-11-20 Thread Ricardo Wurmus


Ludovic Courtès  writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus  skribis:
>
>> yes, mounting with MS_REC seems sensible.  Not mounting with MS_REC is
>> also responsible for a couple of errors e.g. when trying to map / inside
>> the container (when / has other bind mounts).
>
> Having reread mount(2), bind-mounting with MS_REC by default seems like
> a reasonable choice, indeed.

Great.  I’ve pushed this with commit c585b4bc68813a351d6a87d19b9adf4041506355.

-- 
Ricardo





bug#59185: Trouble mounting recursive file systems in containers

2022-11-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi,

Ricardo Wurmus  skribis:

> yes, mounting with MS_REC seems sensible.  Not mounting with MS_REC is
> also responsible for a couple of errors e.g. when trying to map / inside
> the container (when / has other bind mounts).

Having reread mount(2), bind-mounting with MS_REC by default seems like
a reasonable choice, indeed.

Ludo’.





bug#59185: Trouble mounting recursive file systems in containers

2022-11-19 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Morgan,

yes, mounting with MS_REC seems sensible.  Not mounting with MS_REC is
also responsible for a couple of errors e.g. when trying to map / inside
the container (when / has other bind mounts).

Here’s a patch that works for me:

>From 806969ad86038052bf4d0dd2755617beaaa33cb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus 
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 23:16:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] WIP

---
 gnu/build/file-systems.scm | 2 +-
 guix/build/syscalls.scm| 2 ++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/build/file-systems.scm b/gnu/build/file-systems.scm
index 15b8f73312..66ca22d6ea 100644
--- a/gnu/build/file-systems.scm
+++ b/gnu/build/file-systems.scm
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ (define (mount-flags->bit-mask flags)
   (('read-only rest ...)
(logior MS_RDONLY (loop rest)))
   (('bind-mount rest ...)
-   (logior MS_BIND (loop rest)))
+   (logior MS_REC (logior MS_BIND (loop rest
   (('no-suid rest ...)
(logior MS_NOSUID (loop rest)))
   (('no-dev rest ...)
diff --git a/guix/build/syscalls.scm b/guix/build/syscalls.scm
index 61926beb80..2a12567b15 100644
--- a/guix/build/syscalls.scm
+++ b/guix/build/syscalls.scm
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ (define-module (guix build syscalls)
 MS_RELATIME
 MS_BIND
 MS_MOVE
+MS_REC
 MS_SHARED
 MS_LAZYTIME
 MNT_FORCE
@@ -541,6 +542,7 @@ (define MS_NOATIME 1024)
 (define MS_NODIRATIME  2048)
 (define MS_BIND4096)
 (define MS_MOVE8192)
+(define MS_REC16384)
 (define MS_SHARED   1048576)
 (define MS_RELATIME 2097152)
 (define MS_STRICTATIME 16777216)
-- 
2.36.1



-- 
Ricardo


bug#59185: Trouble mounting recursive file systems in containers

2022-11-10 Thread Morgan Smith
Hello!

So I was trying to mount /run/user/1000 in a container so it would have
access to all my wayland sockets and such when I got a very cryptic
error message.

I was trying something like this:

guix shell --share=/run/user/1000 -C coreutils

After far too long tracking down the issue, it turns out that the
directory had submounts within it meaning that the MS_REC flag is
required to bind mount it.

My /run/user/1000 only had a submount because xdg-document-portal was
making one.  To test this yourself you can run `mount` to find something
with some submounts.  I think /sys/fs might fail for me for the same
reason.

Now I have no clue what we should do to enable this use case.  Maybe we
should allow users to specify mount options using something like this?

guix shell -C --mount=rbind,ro=/run/user/1000

Maybe we could always bind with the recursive flag?


Thanks,

Morgan