bug#62448: [PATCH] doc: Note that `guix shell` should contain base language packages.
Hi everyone, Simon Tournier writes: > Nitpick: Missing double space for sentences. > > Otherwise, LGTM. Pushed as 9f68a2a9c41166ec5ac24c082bcd96c433dd2ede. Closing. Best, -- Josselin Poiret signature.asc Description: PGP signature
bug#62448: [PATCH] doc: Note that `guix shell` should contain base language packages.
> The later, I'd say; we're all volunteers :-). Fair enough!
bug#62448: [PATCH] doc: Note that `guix shell` should contain base language packages.
Hello, Skyler via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > Is there a normal timeline for patch review or is it mor of an "as resources > allow" type of deal? The later, I'd say; we're all volunteers :-). -- Thanks, Maxim
bug#62448: [PATCH] doc: Note that `guix shell` should contain base language packages.
Hi,
On jeu., 30 mars 2023 at 22:42, Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix
wrote:
> +Note that it is necessary to include the main @code{python} package in
> +this command even if it is already installed into your environment. This
> +is so that the shell environment knows to set @env{PYTHONPATH} and other
> +related variables. The shell environment cannot check the previously
> +installed environment, because then it would be non-deterministic. This
> +is true for most libraries: their corresponding language package should
> +be included in the shell invocation.
Nitpick: Missing double space for sentences.
Otherwise, LGTM.
Cheers,
simon
bug#62448: [PATCH] doc: Note that `guix shell` should contain base language packages.
Hi Skyler, Skyler writes: > Is there a normal timeline for patch review or is it mor of an "as resources > allow" type of deal? Unfortunately no, there are no guarantees: someone needs to take some time to look at this, and we can't force anyone to do it. The fact that it's in a bug report instead of a patch submission probably doesn't help, let me see if I can fix this with a debbugs command. Best, -- Josselin Poiret signature.asc Description: PGP signature
bug#62448: [PATCH] doc: Note that `guix shell` should contain base language packages.
Is there a normal timeline for patch review or is it mor of an "as resources
allow" type of deal?
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, March 30th, 2023 at 1:42 PM, Josselin Poiret
wrote:
> * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix shell): Explain that python must be included in
> the invocation even if it is already available in the external environment.
>
> Suggested-by: Skyler skyv...@protonmail.com
>
> ---
> doc/guix.texi | 10 +-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
> index c49e51b72e..879a526b77 100644
> --- a/doc/guix.texi
> +++ b/doc/guix.texi
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ Copyright @copyright{} 2021 Domagoj Stolfa@*
> Copyright @copyright{} 2021 Hui Lu@*
> Copyright @copyright{} 2021 pukkamustard@*
> Copyright @copyright{} 2021 Alice Brenon@*
> -Copyright @copyright{} 2021, 2022 Josselin Poiret@*
> +Copyright @copyright{} 2021, 2022, 2023 Josselin Poiret@*
> Copyright @copyright{} 2021 muradm@*
> Copyright @copyright{} 2021, 2022 Andrew Tropin@*
> Copyright @copyright{} 2021 Sarah Morgensen@*
> @@ -5959,6 +5959,14 @@ building or downloading any missing package, and runs
> the
> guix shell python python-numpy -- python3
> @end example
>
> +Note that it is necessary to include the main @code{python} package in
> +this command even if it is already installed into your environment. This
> +is so that the shell environment knows to set @env{PYTHONPATH} and other
> +related variables. The shell environment cannot check the previously
> +installed environment, because then it would be non-deterministic. This
> +is true for most libraries: their corresponding language package should
> +be included in the shell invocation.
> +
> @quotation Note
> @cindex shebang, for @command{guix shell}
> @command{guix shell} can be also be used as a script interpreter, also
>
> base-commit: be5e280e5fe26f93bd5a6e3f76e4502edb913a94
> --
> 2.39.2
bug#62448: [PATCH] doc: Note that `guix shell` should contain base language packages.
* doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix shell): Explain that python must be included in
the invocation even if it is already available in the external environment.
Suggested-by: Skyler
---
doc/guix.texi | 10 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index c49e51b72e..879a526b77 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ Copyright @copyright{} 2021 Domagoj Stolfa@*
Copyright @copyright{} 2021 Hui Lu@*
Copyright @copyright{} 2021 pukkamustard@*
Copyright @copyright{} 2021 Alice Brenon@*
-Copyright @copyright{} 2021, 2022 Josselin Poiret@*
+Copyright @copyright{} 2021, 2022, 2023 Josselin Poiret@*
Copyright @copyright{} 2021 muradm@*
Copyright @copyright{} 2021, 2022 Andrew Tropin@*
Copyright @copyright{} 2021 Sarah Morgensen@*
@@ -5959,6 +5959,14 @@ building or downloading any missing package, and runs the
guix shell python python-numpy -- python3
@end example
+Note that it is necessary to include the main @code{python} package in
+this command even if it is already installed into your environment. This
+is so that the shell environment knows to set @env{PYTHONPATH} and other
+related variables. The shell environment cannot check the previously
+installed environment, because then it would be non-deterministic. This
+is true for most libraries: their corresponding language package should
+be included in the shell invocation.
+
@quotation Note
@cindex shebang, for @command{guix shell}
@command{guix shell} can be also be used as a script interpreter, also
base-commit: be5e280e5fe26f93bd5a6e3f76e4502edb913a94
--
2.39.2
