bug#65001: ‘guix locate’ method is silently ignored when a cache exists
Hi, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > Either: > - the second invocation should imply --update, so Guix should store > the currently cache method(s), > - or Guix should use separate databases for each method. That's > probably too ugly. The latter sounds ugly. The former, why not; we then only need to distinguish between “user-specified method” and “default method” to determine whether ‘--update’ is implied. Ludo’.
bug#65001: ‘guix locate’ method is silently ignored when a cache exists
Quick niggle I noticed: ~/guix master ↑2 λ guix locate libstdc++.so. guix locate: indexing files from /gnu/store... guix locate: traversing local profile manifests... indexing 735 packages … ~/guix master ↑29 ↓26 λ guix locate --method=store libstdc++.so.6 … ~/guix master ↑29 ↓26 λ guix locate --method=store --update libstdc++.so.6 guix locate: indexing files from /gnu/store... indexing 24,455 packages … Either: - the second invocation should imply --update, so Guix should store the currently cache method(s), - or Guix should use separate databases for each method. That's probably too ugly. Kind regards, T G-R Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
