RE: Why can't I get a barline at the end of this"

2007-12-09 Thread Trevor Daniels

Paul Scott wrote on 09 December 2007 06:25
> 
> Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > This is the difference, taken from the new GDP 
> NR manual:
> >
> > "In addition, you can specify "||:", which is 
> equivalent to
> > "|:" except at line breaks, where it gives a 
> double bar line
> > at the end of the line and a start repeat at 
> the beginning
> > of the next line."

> > Subject: Re: Why can't I get a barline at the 
> end of this"
> >
> >
> > unfortunatly I'am not and I do not understand 
> the difference
> > between "||:" and "|:"
> > why does "||:" exist and ":||" not? seems 
> unlogical to me...
> >   
> The second question is not answered and should be 
> considered something 
> like a bug.
> 
> The following leads to no bar line at the end of 
> the repeated section 
> since ":||" is apparently undefined:
> 
> { a'1 \repeat volta 2 { g'1 } \break \bar ":||" f'1 g'1 }
> 
It's not really a bug, as replacing ":||" with ":|" will
do what you want.  The LilyPond syntax defines "|:" ,
":|:" and ":|" as the notation for manually inserting
repeat-related barlines.  Then, because a start repeat
barline might need special processing if it occurs at the
end of a line, a special form of the notation is provided
to invoke this optional special processing - "||:".  No 
special processing is required for an end repeat barline, 
so ":||" is not required.  You might argue that there
should be two forms of the syntax for the end-repeat
barline, which behave identically, but the lack of that
feature is hardly a bug.
 
> Paul Scott
> 
> 



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 529 in lilypond: hooks desired (ie fall/doit that happens before a note)

2007-12-09 Thread codesite-noreply

Issue 529: hooks desired  (ie fall/doit that happens before a note)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=529

Comment #1 by v.villenave:
This reminds me of a thread on -user this summer, for which I had 
written a couple of

functions:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-07/msg00379.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-07/msg00385.html



--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: ChoirStaff mungs lyrics when the syllables have durations - workaround

2007-12-09 Thread Valentin Villenave
2007/12/9, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok.  I think this isn't a real bug, then.  (at least, I'd like to get
> the opinion of a developer with a clue about vocal stuff before I add it)

Anyway, it's a nice workaround.

Steven, could you add it to the LSR, and tag it as "Vocal music" and
"workaround"?

Thanks
Valentin


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 530 in lilypond: collision ambitus accidentals in small range

2007-12-09 Thread codesite-noreply

Issue 530: collision ambitus accidentals in small range
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=530

Comment #1 by rzedeler:
(No comment was entered for this change.)


Issue attribute updates:
Status: Fixed

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 530 in lilypond: collision ambitus accidentals in small range

2007-12-09 Thread codesite-noreply

Issue 530: collision ambitus accidentals in small range
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=530

Comment #2 by rzedeler:
(No comment was entered for this change.)


Issue attribute updates:
Labels: Fixed_2_11_36

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: ChoirStaff mungs lyrics

2007-12-09 Thread Wilbert Berendsen
Op zaterdag 8 december 2007, schreef Steven McDougall:
> % You can avoid this problem with \lyricsto, but I can't use \lyricsto,
> % because I have notes that are melismas in some verses and not others.

Just a hint: in the Lyrics you could \set associatedVoice to another voice 
temporarily, or use \set ignoreMelismata = ##t to ignore a melisma.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Wilbert Berendsen

-- 
http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/
"You must be the change you wish to see in the world."
-- Mahatma Gandi


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond