Re: Spacing/Positioning of Arpeggios when fingerings are present
Isn't this the same bug as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=556q=arpeggio /Mats Jonathan Kulp wrote: While I was working on the arpeggio issue in a thread on the user list, I discovered that arpeggio positioning suffers terribly if fingerings are present and their orientation is set to either left or right. In the attached example you can see the fingerings in the first two chords are set to left and right respectively, and the arpeggios are placed way too far to the left in both cases. The arpeggio belonging to the second chord is placed right on top of the previous chord. When fingering-orientation is set to up and down, the arpeggio is placed correctly (see 3rd chord). Jon ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing School of Electrical Engineering Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Windows Vista
In addition to the previous answer, note that, as usual with Vista, you will need an account with administrator privileges to install LilyPond. Please send future usage questions to the lilypond-user mailing list and reserve the bug-lilypond list for bug reports. /Mats Deborah Luke wrote: Hello Team, I have had to replace my laptop and the new one has Windows Vista instead of XP. I would be grateful if you could comfirm whether or not Lilypond is compatible with Vista as I do not see it listed on your website. Thank you. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing School of Electrical Engineering Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Spacing/Positioning of Arpeggios when fingerings are present
It looks the same, though it only mentions the problem with respect to fingering orientations set to right The problem persists with both right and left orientations. Jon Mats Bengtsson wrote: Isn't this the same bug as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=556q=arpeggio /Mats Jonathan Kulp wrote: While I was working on the arpeggio issue in a thread on the user list, I discovered that arpeggio positioning suffers terribly if fingerings are present and their orientation is set to either left or right. In the attached example you can see the fingerings in the first two chords are set to left and right respectively, and the arpeggios are placed way too far to the left in both cases. The arpeggio belonging to the second chord is placed right on top of the previous chord. When fingering-orientation is set to up and down, the arpeggio is placed correctly (see 3rd chord). Jon ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 694 in lilypond: Enhancement: better support for microtone accidentals
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:39 PM On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:52:11 +0100 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Graham Percival wrote Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:02:37 -0700 We used to include makam.ly in pitches.itely. I don't know what happened to it. There is a snippet called makam-example.ly which is tagged with the snippets for World music and \includes makam.ly. It shows 1/9th tone microtones. Is this what you meant? Yeah, that's what I was talking about. I guess we took it out of Pitches when World was created, but we probably should have kept it in the Pitches Snippet List, and included in the @snippets of Accidentals. I've added makam-example.ly to the @snippets of Accidentals. It's already tagged for Pitches. Trevor ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: vertical spacing issues v2.11.59
2008/10/15 Didi Kanjahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The vertical spacing of Lilypond works amzingly well when you have only one
set
of scores and use the Title/Subtitle headers.
Greetings,
However, when I moved to using markup text instead of using the header,
Lilypond
often does not succeed to use the vertical space vcery well. Even if the
markup
text is less high than the headers were, it does not fit all the score onto
the
same piece of paper any more and often leaves large spaces between the text
and
the next staff. Using between-system-padding and between-system-space helps
some, but does not distribute space evenly and proportionally with the values
entered there. A between-system-padding = 1.7 may still leave 4cm of space
below
the staves and may not give a decent space between staves and lyrics, a
setting
of 1.8 brings one staff on the next page. Between-system-space increases the
space where there is only one line of lyrics (chorus), but not where there are
multiple, thus not distributing it evenly and again, small increases may
cause a
staff to jump to the next page.
Personnally, I'd recommend *not* to set between-system-space and
between-system-padding.
When using markup text for titles etc to combine several pieces of music in
one
file the last one gets split up onto two pages almost regardless of its size.
If
in this situation there was still 5cm of room on the bottom of the page (not
the
last page) and I add a bottom-margin of 1.5cm Lilypond decides that there is
not
enough room on the page anymore and moves all the staves onto the next page.
This is because LilyPond does not have enough place to:
-print a new system and the lyrics
-*and* respect your bottom-margin
-*and* respect your between-system-space.
Setting bottom-margin can dramatically influence the number of pages:
in the example below, a value of 4\cm prints three pages instead of
two.
%%
\paper {
bottom-margin = 5\cm % try with 4\cm
annotate-spacing = ##t
}
notes = { f1 }
\addlyrics { blah }
\addlyrics { blah }
music =
\new Staff \notes
\new Staff \notes
\new Staff \notes
\new Staff \notes
\book {
\score { %1
\music
}
\score { %2
\music
}
\score { %3
\music
}
}
%%
With the Cambodian script fonts that I use, Title and Subtitle of the headers
often have zero vertical spacing (line gap) and can touch, but I have not
found
how I can increase this spacing by a little. All spacing commands and tweaks
seem to apply only to staves and text within a score.
I think this is a bug, I'll file a report. It's the same no matter
what font is used.
See a possible solution below.
How can I generally increase the linespacing between two lines of markup
outside
the staves without adding a new line?
You can include an empty element in your markup:
\markup {
\column {
\null %% This adds an empty element above the text.
\fontsize #7 {Your text}
}
}
Cheers,
Valentin
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: vertical spacing issues v2.11.59
2008/10/16 Valentin Villenave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think this is a bug, I'll file a report. It's the same no matter
what font is used.
Actually, there is no collision when using the default font, even
though there could be more space:
\markup \column {\fontsize #0.1 ppp \fontsize #10 XX}
\header {
title = \markup \medium \fontsize #0.1 ppp
subtitle = \markup \medium \fontsize #10 XX
}
So, I think this is because your characters go below the line.
Again, this can easily be fixed by adding some space inside your
subtitle markup.
Cheers,
Valentin
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Spacing/Positioning of Arpeggios when fingerings are present
2008/10/16 Jonathan Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It looks the same, though it only mentions the problem with respect to fingering orientations set to right The problem persists with both right and left orientations. I have updated the issue with your example. Cheers, Valentin ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
