Lilypond
Dear Sir, Lilypond several times downloaded. I have Windows Vista. Cannot open it, in spite of using the instructions. And is there a Dutcg version? With thanks in advance, Joop Versteegen ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Lilypond
I suspect that http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Where_is_the_app%3F will answer some of your questions. /Mats J.Versteegen wrote: Dear Sir, Lilypond several times downloaded. I have Windows Vista. Cannot open it, in spite of using the instructions. And is there a Dutcg version? With thanks in advance, Joop Versteegen ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing School of Electrical Engineering Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Issue 600 in lilypond: Regression: 'packed-spacing definition may put notes outside the staff
Issue 600: Regression: 'packed-spacing definition may put notes outside the staff http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=600 Comment #4 by n.puttock: Hi Joe, You might have missed the discussion here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-07/msg00671.html Is there a way to keep this fix, while also having tight spacing for ligatures in gregorian chant? I realize that support for ancient music is pretty low on the priority scale, but it would be a shame to release 2.12 with worse ancient spacing than 2.10 (assuming it's easy to fix). Cheers, Neil -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 600 in lilypond: Regression: 'packed-spacing definition may put notes outside the staff
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 09:56 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Issue 600: Regression: 'packed-spacing definition may put notes outside the > staff > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=600 > > Comment #4 by n.puttock: > Hi Joe, > > You might have missed the discussion here: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-07/msg00671.html > > Is there a way to keep this fix, while also having tight spacing for > ligatures in > gregorian chant? Thanks, indeed I had missed that conversation. This turned out to be nothing ancient-specific, it was just a corner case with ragged-bottom=##t and ragged-bottom-last=##f. It's fixed in git. Joe ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 600 in lilypond: Regression: 'packed-spacing definition may put notes outside the staff
2008/11/14 Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 09:56 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Issue 600: Regression: 'packed-spacing definition may put notes outside the >> staff >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=600 >> >> Comment #4 by n.puttock: >> Hi Joe, >> >> You might have missed the discussion here: >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-07/msg00671.html >> >> Is there a way to keep this fix, while also having tight spacing for >> ligatures in >> gregorian chant? > > Thanks, indeed I had missed that conversation. This turned out to be > nothing ancient-specific, it was just a corner case with > ragged-bottom=##t and ragged-bottom-last=##f. It's fixed in git. Cheers for fixing that. How does it relate to Issue 347? Unfortunately, I linked to the wrong part of that thread; it's around here, http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-08/msg00444.html, where it's pointed out that the ancient headword occupies more systems after your fix for #600: the spacing is too loose for the ligatures. Regards, Neil ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
programming error: when \break used before \grace or after \afterGrace in combination with proportional notation
Hello All,
After trying for hours to figure out why my LilyPond score was generating
programming error messages on compilation, I finally found the culprit and
was able to come up with a pair of minimal examples generating the errors. I
searched the mailing lists for solutions to this, but I found no posts of
this specific problem, so I guess this is new.
The problem seems to be occur when combining three things:
1. proportional notation:
proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 34)
\override SpacingSpanner #'strict-note-spacing =##t
2. \grace or \afterGrace notes
3. \break or \pageBreak immediately before \grace or immediately after
\afterGrace notes.
The two errors I get are:
"programming error: bounds of spanner are invalid"
and
"programming error: No spring between column 1 and next one
continuing, cross fingers"
If I remove the strict-note-spacing = ##t assignment, everything works fine.
Minimal code examples are included here, together with the LilyPond output.
Any ideas how this can be fixed or how to go around it? Is this a bug?
Many thanks,
V!ctor Adan.
PS Since this seems like a bug, I'm sending to the bug-lilypond mailing list
too, just in case.
%% CODE BEGINS %
\version "2.11.64"
\include "english.ly"
\layout{
\context{ \Score
proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 34)
\override SpacingSpanner #'strict-note-spacing =##t
%\override SpacingSpanner #'strict-grace-spacing = ##t
%\override SpacingSpanner #'uniform-stretching = ##t
}
}
%% EXAMPLE 1 (afterGrace)
{
\new Voice{
\time 1/4
c'4
\break
\afterGrace c'4 {g'64}
\break
c'4
\break
c'4
}
}
% %% LILYPOND OUTOUT:
% GNU LilyPond 2.11.64
% Processing `test.ly'
% Parsing...
% Interpreting music...
% Preprocessing graphical objects...
% Finding the ideal number of pages...
% Fitting music on 1 page...
% Drawing systems...
% programming error: bounds of spanner are invalid
% programming error: bounds of spanner are invalid
% programming error: bounds of spanner are invalid
% programming error: bounds of spanner are invalid
% programming error: bounds of spanner are invalid
% programming error: bounds of spanner are invalid
% Layout output to `test.ps'...
% Converting to `./test.pdf'...
% EXAMPLE 2 (grace) %%%
{
\new Voice{
\time 1/4
c'4
\break
\grace{ g'64 }
c'4
\break
c'4
\break
c'4
}
}
% %% LILYPOND OUTOUT:
% GNU LilyPond 2.11.64
% Processing `test.ly'
% Parsing...
% Interpreting music...
% Preprocessing graphical objects...
% programming error: No spring between column 1 and next one
% continuing, cross fingers
% programming error: No spring between column 2 and next one
% continuing, cross fingers
% programming error: No spring between column 2 and next one
% continuing, cross fingers
% programming error: No spring between column 2 and next one
% continuing, cross fingers
% programming error: No spring between column 1 and next one
% continuing, cross fingers
% Finding the ideal number of pages...
% Fitting music on 1 page...
% Drawing systems...
% programming error: No spring between column 2 and next one
% continuing, cross fingers
% programming error: No spring between column 1 and next one
% continuing, cross fingers
% Layout output to `test.ps'...
% Converting to `./test.pdf'...
CODE ENDS %%
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Font-cache broken again in 2.11.63 On Windows XP
I've noticed this bug has been reported for various other versions, but haven't seen it for 2.11 yet. Every time I run lilypond, it has to rebuild the font-cache, and ends up touching ~/.lilypond-fonts.cache-2/ef9c9ad8cc5857eb63cb3660bc8bd202-i686-mingw32.cache-2, which takes a terribly unpleasant amount of time. It worked fine in 2.10. I've tried running fc-cache.exe in C:\Windows\fonts and it claims it worked, but I can't find a font.cache-1 file. I have turned off the -R and -S attributes, and yes, I am an administrator. I tried it in lilypond's font dir, as well, and got the same thing, reported success, but no cache file seems to be created. fc-cache does, however, mention something about my MikTex font-cache, here's the verbose output of running fc-cache in the lilypond font dir: == C:/Program Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/current/fonts: skipping, 0 fonts, 3 dirs C:/Program Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf: skipping, 13 fonts, 0 dirs C:/Program Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/current/fonts/svg: skipping, 0 fonts, 0 dirs C:/Program Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/current/fonts/type1: skipping, 33 fonts, 0 dirs C:/Documents and Settings/bmearns/Local Settings/Application Data/MiKTeX/2.6/fontconfig/cache: cleaning c ache directory C:/Documents and Settings/bmearns/Local Settings/Application Data/MiKTeX/2.6/fontconfig/cache: f85d2180d83b90ef64a6269803c711c6-x86.cache-2: cache outdated: C:/Program Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/current/fonts fc-cache.exe: succeeded == Thanks, -Brian ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
