Re: Issue 2200 in lilypond: Dots shouldn't always be placed in one column

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #15 on issue 2200 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Dots shouldn't always be  
placed in one column

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2200

Partially unfixed, in that the default behavior returns to having dots  
aligned across all voices in a staff.


The improvements to allow setting dots individually for each voice remain,  
however, and there is now a regression test 'dot-column-engraver.ly' to  
check that these improvements remain.


To set dots (like those in the original example) closer to their notes, use
\layout {
  \context {\Staff \remove Dot_column_engraver}
  \context {\Voice \consists Dot_column_engraver}
}}


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2389 in lilypond: Patch: Fix make error in regression tests coming from midi2ly

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #13 on issue 2389 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: Fix make error in  
regression tests coming from midi2ly

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2389

Carl, what's up with the following?
git grep echo -n
mf/GNUmakefile: echo -n 'emmentaler-brace'  $@
scripts/build/install-info-html.sh:echo -n $name: Writing index:  
$index_file...

smart-autogen.sh:echo -n $AUTOGEN_INPUT_CHECKSUM  $CHECKSUM_FILE
smart-configure.sh:echo -n $CONFIGURE_CHECKSUM  $CONFIGURE_CHECKSUM_FILE
stepmake/bin/stepmakeise.sh:echo -n Checking version...
stepmake/bin/stepmakeise.sh:echo -n Checking latest...
stepmake/bin/stepmakeise.sh:echo -n Updating StepMake...
stepmake/bin/stepmakeise.sh:echo -n Stepmakeising...

Some of them are progress messages (where the output may be just annoying),  
but others seem more serious.  Can you check whether operation on your  
system is affected for those?



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 2426 in lilypond: test-baseline does not include fonts

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Status: Accepted
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Scripts

New issue 2426 by d...@gnu.org: test-baseline does not include fonts
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2426

Using an archive of premade test-baselines, I just encountered the  
following error with make check:
input/regression/out-test/test-output-distance.ly -  
/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/out/test-results/input/regression/out-test/test-output-distance.ly
invoking gs -sDEVICE=png16m -dGraphicsAlphaBits=4 -dTextAlphaBits=4 
-r101   
-sOutputFile=/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/out/test-results/input/regression/out-test-baseline/test-output-distance.png  
-dNOSAFER -dEPSCrop -q -dNOPAUSE   
input/regression/out-test-baseline/test-output-distance.eps  -c quit

Error: /undefinedfilename in --file--
Operand stack:

(/tmp/lilypond-autobuild/build/out/share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf/emmentaler-20.otf)
(r)

Execution stack:
   %interp_exit   .runexec2   --nostringval--   --nostringval--
--nostringval--   2   %stopped_push   --nostringval--   --nostringval--
--nostringval--   false   1   %stopped_push   1910   1   3   %oparray_pop
1909   1   3   %oparray_pop   --nostringval--   1893   1
3   %oparray_pop   1787   1   3   %oparray_pop
--nostringval--   %errorexec_pop   .runexec2   --nostringval--
--nostringval--   --nostringval--   2   %stopped_push   --nostringval--

Dictionary stack:
   --dict:1165/1684(ro)(G)--   --dict:0/20(G)--   --dict:82/200(L)--
Current allocation mode is local
Last OS error: 2
Current file position is 408
GPL Ghostscript 9.04: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/scripts/build/out/output-distance, line  
1339, in module

main ()
  File /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/scripts/build/out/output-distance, line  
1336, in main
compare_tree_pairs (zip (args[0::2], args[1::2]), out,  
options.threshold)
  File /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/scripts/build/out/output-distance, line  
1057, in compare_tree_pairs

data.create_html_result_page (dest_dir, threshold)
  File /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/scripts/build/out/output-distance, line  
1039, in create_html_result_page

link.link_files_for_html (dest_dir)
  File /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/scripts/build/out/output-distance, line  
659, in link_files_for_html

to_compare = self.create_images (dest_dir)
  File /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/scripts/build/out/output-distance, line  
649, in create_images

system (cmd)
  File /usr/local/tmp/lilypond/scripts/build/out/output-distance, line  
1087, in system

assert stat == 0
AssertionError
make: *** [local-check] Error 1

It would appear that something is trying to load a font from an absolute  
path corresponding to the tree where the test-baseline was created in.


But the fonts at the time of baseline creation obviously are not identical  
with the fonts at the time of regtest comparison.  Any fonts used in the  
test-baseline should either be embedded into the test-baseline files  
themselves, or put in the test-baseline tree in a manner where the regtest  
comparator can preload them when generating the test-baseline images but  
not when generating the current test images.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2425 in lilypond: Patch: Don't reload initialization files when processing multiple files

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #3 on issue 2425 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: Don't reload  
initialization files when processing multiple files

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2425#c3

Don't reload initialization files when processing multiple files

There should probably be something approaching an option for that.  It
should mostly speed up the regtests.  It helps make doc less than
expected, but probably still some.

http://codereview.appspot.com/5874044


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2425 in lilypond: Patch: Don't reload initialization files when processing multiple files

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: Patch-review

Comment #4 on issue 2425 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: Don't reload  
initialization files when processing multiple files

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2425#c4

Patchy the autobot says: LGTM.  But graphviz.log contains:
+programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct*  
Grob::mark_smob(SCM)

+continuing, cross fingers


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


using multiple \layout for different editions - how to reset pagenumber?

2012-03-22 Thread -Eluze

if I use multiple \layout in one \score I can produce different editions of
the same music, e.g. with Fingerings removed in one.

this works beautifully but there is an inconvenience as the page numbering
simply continues.

is there any way to reset it to 1 or 0?

thanks
Eluze
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/using-multiple-%5Clayout-for-different-editions---how-to-reset-pagenumber--tp33544626p33544626.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2406 in lilypond: Patch: Fix mordents and pralltriller in articulate.ly

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: pkx1...@gmail.com

Comment #9 on issue 2406 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Patch: Fix mordents and  
pralltriller in articulate.ly

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2406

I'll take ownership of this and push it this evening.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: using multiple \layout for different editions - how to reset pagenumber?

2012-03-22 Thread Colin Hall
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 07:55:44AM -0700, Eluze wrote:
 
 if I use multiple \layout in one \score I can produce different editions of
 the same music, e.g. with Fingerings removed in one.
 
 this works beautifully but there is an inconvenience as the page numbering
 simply continues.
 
 is there any way to reset it to 1 or 0?

I don't think that is a feature of Lilypond. Certainly I can't find it 
documented anywhere.

Would you like to request an enhancement to have this feature added?

Or how about asking on lilypond-user?

Sorry that I can't be more helpful.

Cheers,
Colin.

-- 

Colin Hall

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2406 in lilypond: Patch: Fix mordents and pralltriller in articulate.ly

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #10 on issue 2406 by gra...@percival-music.ca: Patch: Fix mordents  
and pralltriller in articulate.ly

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2406

Do you have the git patch?  It would be a shame to lose the meta-data that  
Peter has added.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1964 in lilypond: lilydev 2.5

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #37 on issue 1964 by philehol...@gmail.com: lilydev 2.5
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1964

If you look in the mail archive for How to run GUB you'll see something  
from me about installing and running it on a VM with lilydev, and a  
response from GP.  Might be worth using your new lilydev and seeing if you  
can run GUB on it?



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: using multiple \layout for different editions - how to reset pagenumber?

2012-03-22 Thread Eluze

hi Colin


Am 22.03.2012 17:02, schrieb Colin Hall:

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 07:55:44AM -0700, Eluze wrote:

if I use multiple \layout in one \score I can produce different editions of
the same music, e.g. with Fingerings removed in one.

this works beautifully but there is an inconvenience as the page numbering
simply continues.

is there any way to reset it to 1 or 0?

I don't think that is a feature of Lilypond. Certainly I can't find it 
documented anywhere.
you're right, it's not documented but so far it works and it also works 
with midi {} so that you can
create different midi files at once with different tempo (just as 
example) - very useful for practicing!


btw, every midi {} creates an own midi file!



Would you like to request an enhancement to have this feature added?

Or how about asking on lilypond-user?

yes, sorry - I was on the wrong list!

let's discuss it before making an enhancement request.

thanks
Eluze


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2425 in lilypond: Patch: Don't reload initialization files when processing multiple files

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #5 on issue 2425 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Patch: Don't reload  
initialization files when processing multiple files

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2425

There are problems with this regtest already, see issue 2078---exposed in  
greater light, maybe we'll see a fix for those problems.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2425 in lilypond: Patch: Don't reload initialization files when processing multiple files

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #6 on issue 2425 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: Don't reload  
initialization files when processing multiple files

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2425

Well, it is obvious that last-grob-action will keep dead objects around.   
But it makes little enough sense that the error message did not occur  
previously.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2078 in lilypond: always-changing regtest: graphviz.log

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: Patch-new

Comment #1 on issue 2078 by d...@gnu.org: always-changing regtest:  
graphviz.log

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2078#c1

Issue 2078: always-changing regtest: graphviz.log

This sanitizes some association list usage and protects hooks against
garbage collection.

http://codereview.appspot.com/5885048


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Error in documentation

2012-03-22 Thread Nick Payne
In the snippets documentation, the second of the coda symbols (beginning 
of the third stave of output) in the snippet 
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/snippets/repeats#repeats-positioning-segno-and-coda-_0028with-line-break_0029 
is shifted to the left and only partly visible in the snippet output.


Nick

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2078 in lilypond: always-changing regtest: graphviz.log

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: Patch-review

Comment #2 on issue 2078 by d...@gnu.org: always-changing regtest:  
graphviz.log

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2078#c2

Patchy the autobot says: LGTM.  Well, quite a bit of change in the graphviz  
regtest, mostly no longer duplicate subgraphs.  I am sceptical that the  
caching order is related, though.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2424 in lilypond: Patch: Add for-some-music and fold-some-music

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-review Fixed_2_15_35

Comment #3 on issue 2424 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: Add for-some-music and  
fold-some-music

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2424

Pushed as 92bfc879f666457f9dc51b190f4f605937035179 to staging.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1788 in lilypond: auto numbering footnote checkin doesn't play with \null and \musicglyph

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Owner: d...@gnu.org
Mergedinto: 2376

Comment #6 on issue 1788 by d...@gnu.org: auto numbering footnote checkin  
doesn't play with \null and \musicglyph

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1788

After using convert-ly, the result does not look unexpected to me.  Likely  
fixed with the fix to 2376.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2376 in lilypond: Automatic footnotes on \null markups causes unexpected results

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #22 on issue 2376 by d...@gnu.org: Automatic footnotes on \null  
markups causes unexpected results

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2376

Issue 1788 has been merged into this issue.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue with AikenHeads with overlapping parts

2012-03-22 Thread Darren
 I'm not top posting.

I'm trying to create a score for four voices SATB that uses AikenHeads (shaped 
notes).  When two parts on the same staff overlap on the same notes (for 
example soprano and alto), it is customary to show the stems for the two parts 
going different directions so each part realizes that it is to sing the 
overlapping notes.

When I try to do this with LilyPond 2.14.2, 

1. The heads face in opposite directions, which obscures the shape of the head.

2. I tried suppressing the Note Head for one of the parts (made it 
transparent), however the stem does not meet the note head of the opposite part.

Example .ly code follows.  It requires a bit of detail to demonstrate the 
problem.  I have a screen shot I can provide if that would help (but this 
interface doesn't accept attachments).

The bass staff demonstrates #1, the treble staff demonstrates #2.

Thanks for any assistance


\version 2.14.2

global = {
  \key a \major
  \time 4/4
  \partial 4
  \aikenHeads
}

ignoreCollide = \override NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##t

sopranoNotesVerseOne =  \relative c' {
  \global \stemUp
  cis8 d e e e e e4. fis8 fis e8 ~ e2
}

altoNotesVerseOne = \relative c' {
  \global
  \new Voice {
\override NoteHead #'transparent = ##t
\ignoreCollide \aikenHeads \stemDown
cis8 d
  }
  cis cis cis cis cis4. d8 d cis8 ~ cis2
}

bassNotesVerseOne = \relative c {
  \global \stemDown
  cis8 d a a a a a4. a8 a a ~ a2
}

tenorNotesVerseOne = \relative c' {
  \global
  \new Voice {
\ignoreCollide \aikenHeads \stemUp
cis,8 d
  }
  a'8 a a a a4. a8 a a ~ a2
}

trebleClef = \new Staff  
  \context Voice 
\sopranoNotesVerseOne
\altoNotesVerseOne
  


bassClef = \new Staff 
  \clef bass
  \context Voice 
\bassNotesVerseOne
\tenorNotesVerseOne
  


\score {
   \trebleClef  \bassClef   
  \layout { }
}













___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1559 in lilypond: Footnotes: empty fill-lines in header footer

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Owner: d...@gnu.org
Mergedinto: 2376

Comment #2 on issue 1559 by d...@gnu.org: Footnotes: empty fill-lines in  
header  footer

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1559

After convert-ly, does not exhibit the described symptoms which are quite  
similar to the ones in issue 2376.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2376 in lilypond: Automatic footnotes on \null markups causes unexpected results

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #23 on issue 2376 by d...@gnu.org: Automatic footnotes on \null  
markups causes unexpected results

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2376

Issue 1559 has been merged into this issue.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: using multiple \layout for different editions - how to reset pagenumber?

2012-03-22 Thread Janek Warchoł
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote:

 Am 22.03.2012 17:02, schrieb Colin Hall:

 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 07:55:44AM -0700, Eluze wrote:
 is there any way to reset it to 1 or 0?

 I don't think that is a feature of Lilypond. Certainly I can't find it
 documented anywhere.

 let's discuss it before making an enhancement request.

My opinion is that the current behavior is wrong.

thanks,
Janek

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: Patch-new

Comment #12 on issue 2216 by pkx1...@gmail.com: AU: Document all options  
for lilypond -dhelp

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216#c12

Doc: AU - document -dhelp CLI options

Issue 2216

Add new @node for the -d[Scheme_val] option.
Renamed old node so that it is distinguishable from the
cli using sceheme variables.

Moved all the original -d[symbol] information over and added
some @ref{} for different options.

Other minor syntax changes and spacing edits on surrounding text.

http://codereview.appspot.com/5843060


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 2427 in lilypond: Patch: Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Status: New
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Enhancement Patch-new

New issue 2427 by plros...@gmail.com: Patch: Add an example implementation  
of cross-staff stems

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2427

Add an example implementation of cross-staff stems

http://codereview.appspot.com/5882053


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Error in documentation

2012-03-22 Thread James
Hello,

On 22 March 2012 19:09, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
 In the snippets documentation, the second of the coda symbols (beginning of
 the third stave of output) in the snippet
 http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/snippets/repeats#repeats-positioning-segno-and-coda-_0028with-line-break_0029
 is shifted to the left and only partly visible in the snippet output.

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2428

james

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 2428 in lilypond: symbol is shifted to the left and only partly visible in the snippet output

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Status: Accepted
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Documentation

New issue 2428 by pkx1...@gmail.com: symbol is shifted to the left and only  
partly visible in the snippet output

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2428

Nick Payne via gnu.org

In the snippets documentation, the second of the coda symbols (beginning of  
the third stave of output) in the snippet  
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/snippets/repeats#repeats-positioning-segno-and-coda-_0028with-line-break_0029  
is shifted to the left and only partly visible in the snippet output.


Nick


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 2429 in lilypond: using multiple \layout for different editions - how to reset pagenumber?

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Status: Accepted
Owner: 

New issue 2429 by elu...@gmail.com: using multiple \layout for different  
editions - how to reset pagenumber?

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2429

using multiple \layout blocks in a \score you can produce different  
editions of the same music, e.g. with Fingerings removed in one.


this works beautifully but there is an inconvenience as the page numbering  
simply continues.


is there any way to reset it to 1 or 0?

here is an example:

\version 2.15.34
theMusic = \context Staff {
  \repeat unfold 12 { \relative { c -2 \54 q q q }
\pageBreak
}
}
\score {
  \theMusic
  \layout {}
  \layout {
\context {
  \Voice
  \override NoteHead #'color = #red
  }
  }
  \layout {
\context {
  \Voice
  \remove New_fingering_engraver
  }
  }
  \midi {\tempo 4 = 200 }
  \midi {\tempo 4 = 72 }
}



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: using multiple \layout for different editions - how to reset pagenumber?

2012-03-22 Thread Eluze



Am 22.03.2012 23:10, schrieb Janek Warchoł:

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Eluzeelu...@gmail.com  wrote:

Am 22.03.2012 17:02, schrieb Colin Hall:


On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 07:55:44AM -0700, Eluze wrote:

is there any way to reset it to 1 or 0?

I don't think that is a feature of Lilypond. Certainly I can't find it
documented anywhere.

let's discuss it before making an enhancement request.

My opinion is that the current behavior is wrong.

thanks,
Janek

thanks for your opinions!
I also feel that if it's possible to use it it should be clear what 
results from it.


I've added it as  https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2429

cheers
Eluze

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2406 in lilypond: Patch: Fix mordents and pralltriller in articulate.ly

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-push fixed_2_15_35

Comment #11 on issue 2406 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Patch: Fix mordents and  
pralltriller in articulate.ly

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2406


author  Peter Chubb peter.ch...@nicta.com.au
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:45:54 + (22:45 +)
committer   James Lowe pkx1...@gmail.com
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:49:55 + (22:49 +)
commit  fe9136b9090bd320d321cfa347effa076b375066

Included all the meta-data from Rietveld.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue with AikenHeads with overlapping parts

2012-03-22 Thread Colin Hall

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:39:00PM +, Darren wrote:
  I'm not top posting.
 
 I'm trying to create a score for four voices SATB that uses AikenHeads 
 (shaped 
 notes).  When two parts on the same staff overlap on the same notes (for 
 example soprano and alto), it is customary to show the stems for the two 
 parts 
 going different directions so each part realizes that it is to sing the 
 overlapping notes.
 
 When I try to do this with LilyPond 2.14.2, 
 
 1. The heads face in opposite directions, which obscures the shape of the 
 head.
 
 2. I tried suppressing the Note Head for one of the parts (made it 
 transparent), however the stem does not meet the note head of the opposite 
 part.
 
 Example .ly code follows.  It requires a bit of detail to demonstrate the 
 problem.  I have a screen shot I can provide if that would help (but this 
 interface doesn't accept attachments).

Thanks for putting the bug report together, Darren. I was able to reproduce the 
behaviour you reported.

I also tried removing the \ignoreCollide from your source just to see what 
happens, and I have to say that the output looks correct to me. See attached. 
The notes are both supertonics and the note shape seems correct.

But I've never used Aikenhead notation so I may not be the best judge. I will 
create a tracker so we don't lose your input. In the meantime, could you send 
an example of good practice for colliding Aikenhead notes, or an image of what 
you think Lilypond should do in this situation?

Cheers,
Colin.

-- 

Colin Hall
%  I'm not top posting.

% I'm trying to create a score for four voices SATB that uses AikenHeads 
(shaped 
% notes).  When two parts on the same staff overlap on the same notes (for 
% example soprano and alto), it is customary to show the stems for the two 
parts 
% going different directions so each part realizes that it is to sing the 
% overlapping notes.

% When I try to do this with LilyPond 2.14.2, 

% 1. The heads face in opposite directions, which obscures the shape of the 
head.

% 2. I tried suppressing the Note Head for one of the parts (made it 
% transparent), however the stem does not meet the note head of the opposite 
part.

% Example .ly code follows.  It requires a bit of detail to demonstrate the 
% problem.  I have a screen shot I can provide if that would help (but this 
% interface doesn't accept attachments).

% The bass staff demonstrates #1, the treble staff demonstrates #2.

% Thanks for any assistance


\version 2.14.2

global = {
  \key a \major
  \time 4/4
  \partial 4
  \aikenHeads
}

ignoreCollide = \override NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##t

sopranoNotesVerseOne =  \relative c' {
  \global \stemUp
  cis8 d e e e e e4. fis8 fis e8 ~ e2
}

altoNotesVerseOne = \relative c' {
  \global
  \new Voice {
%\override NoteHead #'transparent = ##t
\aikenHeads \stemDown
cis8 d
  }
  cis cis cis cis cis4. d8 d cis8 ~ cis2
}

bassNotesVerseOne = \relative c {
  \global \stemDown
  cis8 d a a a a a4. a8 a a ~ a2
}

tenorNotesVerseOne = \relative c' {
  \global
  \new Voice {
%\ignoreCollide \aikenHeads \stemUp
\aikenHeads \stemUp
cis,8 d
  }
  a'8 a a a a4. a8 a a ~ a2
}

trebleClef = \new Staff  
  \context Voice 
\sopranoNotesVerseOne
\altoNotesVerseOne
  


bassClef = \new Staff 
  \clef bass
  \context Voice 
\bassNotesVerseOne
\tenorNotesVerseOne
  


\score {
   \trebleClef  \bassClef   
  \layout { }
}


% ___
% bug-lilypond mailing list
% bug-lilypond@gnu.org
% https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
attachment: bug.preview.png___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 2430 in lilypond: Issue with AikenHeads with overlapping parts

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Status: Accepted
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Ugly

New issue 2430 by colingh...@gmail.com: Issue with AikenHeads with  
overlapping parts

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2430

Reported by Darren:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2012-03/msg00941.html


I'm trying to create a score for four voices SATB that uses AikenHeads  
(shaped

notes).  When two parts on the same staff overlap on the same notes (for
example soprano and alto), it is customary to show the stems for the two  
parts

going different directions so each part realizes that it is to sing the
overlapping notes.

When I try to do this with LilyPond 2.14.2,

1. The heads face in opposite directions, which obscures the shape of the  
head.


2. I tried suppressing the Note Head for one of the parts (made it
transparent), however the stem does not meet the note head of the opposite  
part.


Example .ly code follows.  It requires a bit of detail to demonstrate the
problem.  I have a screen shot I can provide if that would help (but this
interface doesn't accept attachments).

The bass staff demonstrates #1, the treble staff demonstrates #2.

Thanks for any assistance


\version 2.14.2

global = {
  \key a \major
  \time 4/4
  \partial 4
  \aikenHeads
}

ignoreCollide = \override NoteColumn #'ignore-collision = ##t

sopranoNotesVerseOne =  \relative c' {
  \global \stemUp
  cis8 d e e e e e4. fis8 fis e8 ~ e2
}

altoNotesVerseOne = \relative c' {
  \global
  \new Voice {
\override NoteHead #'transparent = ##t
\ignoreCollide \aikenHeads \stemDown
cis8 d
  }
  cis cis cis cis cis4. d8 d cis8 ~ cis2
}

bassNotesVerseOne = \relative c {
  \global \stemDown
  cis8 d a a a a a4. a8 a a ~ a2
}

tenorNotesVerseOne = \relative c' {
  \global
  \new Voice {
\ignoreCollide \aikenHeads \stemUp
cis,8 d
  }
  a'8 a a a a4. a8 a a ~ a2
}

trebleClef = \new Staff  
  \context Voice 
\sopranoNotesVerseOne
\altoNotesVerseOne
  


bassClef = \new Staff 
  \clef bass
  \context Voice 
\bassNotesVerseOne
\tenorNotesVerseOne
  


\score {
   \trebleClef  \bassClef   
  \layout { }
}



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2430 in lilypond: Issue with AikenHeads with overlapping parts

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #1 on issue 2430 by colingh...@gmail.com: Issue with AikenHeads  
with overlapping parts

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2430

I reproduced the bug. Also tried the same music but without using  
ignoreCollide and transparent and it looks ok to me.


Emailed Darren asking for an example of good practice or desired typeset  
output from Lilypond.


Attachments:
bug.ly  2.0 KB
bug.preview.png  6.9 KB


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue with AikenHeads with overlapping parts

2012-03-22 Thread Colin Hall
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:19:42PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
 
 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:39:00PM +, Darren wrote:
   I'm not top posting.
  
  I'm trying to create a score for four voices SATB that uses AikenHeads 
  (shaped 
  notes).  When two parts on the same staff overlap on the same notes (for 
  example soprano and alto), it is customary to show the stems for the two 
  parts 
  going different directions so each part realizes that it is to sing the 
  overlapping notes.
  
  When I try to do this with LilyPond 2.14.2, 
  
  1. The heads face in opposite directions, which obscures the shape of the 
  head.
  
  2. I tried suppressing the Note Head for one of the parts (made it 
  transparent), however the stem does not meet the note head of the opposite 
  part.
  
  Example .ly code follows.  It requires a bit of detail to demonstrate the 
  problem.  I have a screen shot I can provide if that would help (but this 
  interface doesn't accept attachments).
 

 Thanks for putting the bug report together, Darren. I was able to
 reproduce the behaviour you reported.

 I also tried removing the \ignoreCollide from your source just to
 see what happens, and I have to say that the output looks correct to
 me. See attached. The notes are both supertonics and the note shape
 seems correct.

Ooops! Not supertonics, they are subdominants. But you take my point.

 But I've never used Aikenhead notation so I may not be the best judge. I will 
 create a tracker so we don't lose your input. In the meantime, could you send 
 an example of good practice for colliding Aikenhead notes, or an image of 
 what you think Lilypond should do in this situation?

New issue tracker is 2430, see link:

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2430

Cheers,
Colin.

-- 

Colin Hall

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2408 in lilypond: Inconsistent automatic beaming when using multiple tuplets next to each other

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push

Comment #5 on issue 2408 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Inconsistent automatic  
beaming when using multiple tuplets next to each other

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2408

Mike and David have comments on Rietveld, but can they be addressed in a  
separate patch, for the sake of getting a Critical issue fixed?  If so,  
tyhis has had a countdown and can be pushed.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2397 in lilypond: Tuplet number incorrectly placed when using additonal articulations and/or abreak

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push

Comment #11 on issue 2397 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Tuplet number  
incorrectly placed when using additonal articulations and/or abreak

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2397

Counted down to 20120321, please push.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2391 in lilypond: Add Appendix entry for Predefined Paper Sizes

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push

Comment #10 on issue 2391 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Add Appendix entry for  
Predefined Paper Sizes

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2391

Counted down to 20120321, please push.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2408 in lilypond: Inconsistent automatic beaming when using multiple tuplets next to each other

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-push Patch-needs_work

Comment #6 on issue 2408 by gra...@percival-music.ca: Inconsistent  
automatic beaming when using multiple tuplets next to each other

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2408

I think that David's suggestion is important require a revised patch, but  
that revised patch can be pushed directly to staging.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2423 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails to include a file from a parent directory

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #9 on issue 2423 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: lilypond-book fails to  
include a file from a parent directory

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2423

Counted down, repaired, retested, then put back on countdown by the  
developer.  I don't know if you intended it to go on today's countdown list  
(it would have, based on the test from Patchy yesterday) or if you intended  
the countdown from Tuesday to continue and end today, so I'm making the  
assumption that the system works as intended: patches get -new from the  
developer, -review from Patchy, and then go on -countdown for 2 days (3 on  
weekends), and if no developer has questions, get put on -push.


I'm being picky, but I know Graham and others want to automate the patch  
system end to end, and if it behaves unpredictably, their task is an  
unlovely one indeed.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2412 in lilypond: Online website uses old /web/about/browser-language location

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-countdown

Comment #9 on issue 2412 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Online website uses old  
/web/about/browser-language location

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2412

(No comment was entered for this change.)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 2310 in lilypond: Patch: some comments and complaints on the code

2012-03-22 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-needs_work

Comment #12 on issue 2310 by gra...@percival-music.ca: Patch: some comments  
and complaints on the code

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2310

We have some concerns about the .gitignore; the patch as it stands is not  
ready for pushing.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond