Re: bug? with Choir Staff
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:45 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes: just FYI, the barline problem was fixed in 2.15.10 (commit b92ea16ef75d8aaa7bdb9f492b58d7af906e7945). While it will likely catch most uses, bar_line_color == staff_color is mixing C operators and only compares for strict eq-equivalence. It might make more sense to write ly_is_equal (bar_line_color, staff_color) here instead. I understand that you refer to how it should be done in c++ code? I mean, this has been ported to Scheme entirely (deafba084c8ecf6af02f64455856147821b598c7), and the logic is now in scm/bar-line.scm, line 356. I don't see your comment being applicable to this new scheme code - am i missing something? (if (eq? bar-line-color staff-color) ... should likely be (if (equal? bar-line-color staff-color) ... since you otherwise get guile (eq? (rgb-color 0 0 0) (rgb-color 0 0 0)) #f guile (equal? (rgb-color 0 0 0) (rgb-color 0 0 0)) #t guile Annoyingly, (rgb-color 0 0 0) is still different from (rgb-color 0. 0. 0.). But at least if you use the same invocation, the colors should arguably be considered equal. -- David Kastrup ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: vertical skylines problems
On 30 août 2012, at 14:10, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote: I really like the new vertical skylines patch, as it now moves dynamics and hairpins much closer to the notes they belong to (so far, they often left some ugly space). This allows much better (and tighter) vertical spacing, without looking too crammed. However, there are some situations, where things go overboard. I haven't had time to create minimal examples, I'm just attaching some screenshots from a huge score I'm working on... Cheers, Reinhold -- -- Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://www.kainhofer.com * Financial Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * Edition Kainhofer, Music Publisher, http://www.edition-kainhofer.com skyline1.pngskyline2.pngskyline3.pngskyline4.pngskyline5.pngskyline6.pngskyline7.png___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond A couple quick responses. 1) Get the LedgerLineSpanner to produce vertical skylines and that solves half of the problems. 2) Create an override for DynamicText (or whatever cresc. is) vertical-skylines that takes the skyline produced and adds padding to it. That'll avoid stemular interpenetration. 3) Add Ties to Script side-support elements. And there you have it. I'll propose patches. Cheers, MS ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: vertical skylines problems
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 02:50:18PM +0200, Mike Solomon wrote: On 30 ao?t 2012, at 14:10, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote: I really like the new vertical skylines patch, as it now moves dynamics and hairpins much closer to the notes they belong to (so far, they often left some ugly space). This allows much better (and tighter) vertical spacing, without looking too crammed. However, there are some situations, where things go overboard. I haven't had time to create minimal examples, I'm just attaching some screenshots from a huge score I'm working on... Thanks for the bug report, Reinhold. I've created an issue tracker here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2795 Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Length of a footnote note
Hi all,
There seems to be no limitation to the length of the annotation string
of a footnote.
It would be nice to be able to spread it over several lines, even
without taking the mark part into account.
Could anyone help me to construct a function to deal with that?
Cheers,
Jean-Charles
\version 2.16.0
\paper {
footnote-auto-number = ##f
}
lorem = \wordwrap-lines { Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. }
\book {
\score {
\markup { Lorem ipsum \footnote * * Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. dolor... }
\relative c' {
a'1
}
}
\pageBreak
\score {\markup { Lorem ipsum \footnote * * \lorem dolor... }
\relative c' {
a'1
}
}
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Length of a footnote note
Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr writes: Hi all, There seems to be no limitation to the length of the annotation string of a footnote. It would be nice to be able to spread it over several lines, even without taking the mark part into account. Could anyone help me to construct a function to deal with that? Could you try testing the code examples you submit? -- David Kastrup ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Length of a footnote note
Sorry, I tried something else in the middle.
Here it is.
\version 2.16.0
\paper {
footnote-auto-number = ##f
}
lorem = \markup { \justify { Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. } }
\book {
\lorem
\markup { Lorem ipsum \footnote * * Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. dolor... }
\score {
\relative c' {
a'1
}
}
\pageBreak
\markup { Lorem ipsum \footnote * * \lorem dolor... }
\score {
\relative c' {
a'1
}
}
}
footnote-long.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Length of a footnote note
David Kastrup writes:
Does something like
\version 2.16.0
\paper {
footnote-auto-number = ##f
}
lorem = \markup { \justify { Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur
adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna
aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. } }
\book {
\lorem
\markup { Lorem ipsum \footnote * \justify { * Lorem ipsum dolor sit
amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore
et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation
ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. } dolor... }
\score {
\relative c' {
a'1
}
}
\pageBreak
\markup { Lorem ipsum \footnote * \put-adjacent #X #LEFT \lorem *
dolor... }
\score {
\relative c' {
a'1
}
}
}
give you ideas?
Many thanks! It works like a charm.
I was really upset by the quoted string as being the way to introduce
the annotation and did not come to such a simple workaround. And I
wanted to avoid the use of another variable in my project just for this
particular case.
Thanks also for teaching me how to use \put-adjacent:
I can even type
Lorem ipsum \footnote * \put-adjacent #X #LEFT \justify {the long
text} *
Nice way to put whatever plus text in the annotation.
Cheers,
Jean-Charles
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
