Re: 2.17.16 vs 2.17.17 Page Breaking

2013-05-12 Thread Keith OHara

On Sat, 04 May 2013 22:14:52 -0700, Jay Anderson  wrote:


I figured out where this was coming from. I was using something like

\score << { label #'a } { ... music ...} >>



Quite likely your original example will go back to fitting on one page with 
version 2.17.18.
The fix to issue 3338, which corrects how empty staves are skipped for 
page-layout-planning, made it into that release.
I still plan to remove the recently-added space-allowance for tempo marks, but 
haven't uploaded that change yet.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: bookparts with paper blocks

2013-05-12 Thread Federico Bruni
Hi Francisco

sorry for the late reply
I want to add it to the tracker but I'd like to have some more information

2013/5/1 Francisco Vila 

> 2013/5/1 Federico Bruni :
> > 2013/4/30 Francisco Vila 
> >>
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> In "File structure" we are saying that bookparts can help on having
> >> different paper settings for each part, but in fact this conflicts
> >> with the statement we state (in the same page) that paper settings act
> >> on the whole book.
> >>
> >> This is confusing, do you agree?
> >>
> >
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/file-structure
> >
> > I don't think it's really confusing, but it may be better explained with
> > examples.
> > I think that we may add a paper block and an explanation in the last
> snippet
> > of this page:
> >
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/multiple-scores-in-a-book
> >
> > BTW, Trevor recently pushed this:
> > https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2902
> >
> > see NR 4.1.1:
> >
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/the-_005cpaper-block
>
> What I read all around is that settings are merged. The interesting
> bit is a hierarchical prevalence. But a simple experiment which I'm
> sure many users have tried, is to set a variable in a paper block in a
> bookpart, and see how this variable affects the whole book. Any
> example from us should show that you can not expect this setting
> affects only to that bookpart unless you have a setting in a higher
> hierarchy that acts as a default for the rest of the book.
>
>
I don't understand the last sentence. Do you have an example?
In the simple example attached, the hierarchical prevalence works fine.



> >> I've also seen many unanswered questions in the list archives about
> >> using bookparts to join scores. IMO it is confusing that we don't
> >> offer a template or something warning that you can not simply include
> >> a working score in a bookpart, and instead you have to handle a
> >> bookpart as if it were a score block.
> >
> >
> > I can't understand your last sentence.
>
> Handle a bookpart as if it were a score block, in the sense of you can
> not put assignments on it. What one expects is to have a working file
> with both variable assignments and a \score{}, and simply put it
> inside of a bookpart{}, which can not be done just as you can not put
> assignments into the \score{}. I think it is common that users want to
> join scores in a book and first thing they try involves leaving their
> original files untouched. This is not possible: you have to split
> every file in two, and include them in different places of the master
> file, namely assignments outside of the bookpart and scores inside of.
>
>
minimal example please
these things are tricky...


book.ly
Description: Binary data


song1.ly
Description: Binary data


song2.ly
Description: Binary data
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Misplaced staccato dot

2013-05-12 Thread Keith OHara
Timothy Lanfear  costamagna.demon.co.uk> writes:

> f'8 \change Staff="R" f'( \change Staff="L" f'_. f')

Thanks.  I added issue 3363.  A similar bug was recently fixed, 
but that fix does not solve this case.

Workaround: \override Script #'avoid-slur = #'around



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Misplaced staccato dot

2013-05-12 Thread Timothy Lanfear
> I'm not top posting.

Why is the staccato dot far below the note? Strangely, the slur is
important: if you remove the slur, the dot moves to the correct place. Bug
first appears in 2.17.10

\version "2.17.10"

{
  <<
\new Staff = "R" { s2 }
\new Staff = "L" {
  \new Voice {
\voiceTwo
f'8 \change Staff="R" f'( \change Staff="L" f'_. f')
  }
}
  >>
}



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond