Re: fingering overlap - bug?

2013-11-30 Thread Keith OHara 
karol  wp.pl> writes:

> My question is: how can I improve the code
> to have this TextScript closer to the staff?

Ask on the lilypond-user mailing list.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: fingering overlap - bug?

2013-11-30 Thread karol 
Because LilyPond does not handle fingaring notation well, I wrote markup
command:

\version "2.17.96"

#(define-markup-command
  (fingerMod layout props arg)
  (markup-list?)
  (interpret-markup layout props
(markup
  (#:left-align
(#:override
  '(baseline-skip . 1.5)
  (#:finger
(make-center-column-markup arg)))

{
  4 ^\markup \fingerMod { 1 3 5 } c'2.
}

The drawback is that the numerals are not centered on notehead.

Now, take a look at the example. My question is: how can I improve the code
to have this TextScript closer to the staff?

Karol  



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/fingering-overlap-bug-tp154572p154723.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Percent repeat

2013-11-30 Thread Janek Warchoł 
Hi,


2013/11/30 Noeck :
> Hi,
>
> is this a bug or is there some reason why this should be correct:
>
> If I use a percent repeat in a customly timed measure (5/4 instead of
> 4/4), the repeat symbol lacks the dots and is placed to the left of the
> bar. If I write something before the repeat (a time signature or only
> <>), then the dots reappear and they are placed properly.

looks like a bug to me.  Forwarding to bug-lilypond.


\version "2.16.2" % also tested with 2.17.26

<<
  \new Staff {
\tempo "wrong?"
\time 5/4
\repeat unfold 10 a'4
  }
  \new RhythmicStaff {
\repeat percent 2 { c4 c c c c }
  }
>>

<<
  \new Staff {
\tempo "what I expect"
\time 5/4
\repeat unfold 10 a'4
  }
  \new RhythmicStaff {
<>  % (*) this is the only difference
\repeat percent 2 { c4 c c c c }
  }
>>

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: fingering overlap - bug?

2013-11-30 Thread Colin Campbell 

On 11/29/2013 11:30 PM, Keith OHara wrote:

Colin Campbell  shaw.ca> writes:


So, you can do the same as we did when using version 2.12: rearrange
the order of pitches in the chord so a main-column note comes first.

Would it be worth making a note of a Known Issue, in NR 1.7.1?

Yes. Either bug-report or known issue would be lovely.




Reported as Issue 3692 
: Fingering 
collision with accidentals


Cheers,
Colin
--
Sometimes the thoughts in my head get so bored they go out for a stroll 
through my mouth. This is rarely a good thing.

- Scott Westerfield
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: RehearsalMark breaks system's ref-point? (was: The ultimate slur shaping function)

2013-11-30 Thread Janek Warchoł 
Hi Ralph,

2013/11/26 Ralph Palmer :
>
> Hi, Janek - I went ahead and submitted this as Issue 3677 :
> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3677
>
> Hope I wasn't out of line!

Turns out this wasn't a bug, but thanks for help anyway!  It doesn't
hurt to have additinal issues in the tracker, as long as they are
labeled corectly :)

best,
Jaenk

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: fingering overlap - bug?

2013-11-30 Thread Janek Warchoł 
Hi,

2013/11/30 Keith OHara :
> karol  wp.pl> writes:
>
>> {
>>   1 ^1^2^5
>> }
>>
>
> Unfortunately this is a different bug -- or two -- so it will
> not be fixed at the same time as collisions between Fingerings.
>
> (1) LilyPond has never looked at Accidentals when placing Fingering;
> until recently that caused only small overlaps with sharps because
> the Fingering did not previously fit so close to the chord.
>
> (2) Fingering on a chord as a whole should center over the main column
> of note-heads; instead it centers over the first-input note.
>
> So, you can do the same as we did when using version 2.12: rearrange
> the order of pitches in the chord so a main-column note comes first.
>
> { 1 ^1^2^5 }

This is similar to issues
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2245
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2451
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2452

and i believe to solve it in a general way we would have to teach
lilypond about different kinds of extents - see:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-06/msg00230.html
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3239 (sorry, that
issue got pretty messy).

Currently the work i started on this is waiting until 2.18.0 is out...
 What about leaving it for now and attacking this together after 2.18?

Janek

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond