Re: some tiny care for the Sponsoring page
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 09:00:48AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > There has been an offer by the FSF to collect and disburse donations for > LilyPond. They are taking a 10% cut if I remember correctly, but it > would allow credit card processing, donation buttons and some other > fairly standard stuff. I declined last time this was brought up since > I barely made ends meet and am less than convinced that microdonations > will make up for dedicated people putting up a regular plan (of course, > they still could). Before I comment, I will say that this is none of my business and I really don't deserve a voice in this except being a potential supporter David, you seem to think that FSF/credit card payments will only result in increased "microdonations" that I would agree may not come near the 10% cost. I do think, however, that you may be overlooking the chance of increased 'larger-than-micro' donations. Do not underestimate the power of convenience. There has been more than a few occasions where I have gotten it in my head to go to the support page and donate, got there and got pissed off at lack of information/options and just gave up/forgot to follow up my 2c Eugene -- Eugene Cormier --- Full-time Instructor Acadia University www.eugenecormier.com eugenecorm...@gmail.com Office: Denton Hall Rm.235 Office Hours: Monday & Wednesday 10:30-11:30 (or by appointment) Phone: (902) 585-1329 --- Statement of Confidentiality This message (including attachments) may contain confidential or privileged information intended for a specific individual or organization. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should promptly delete this email from your entire computer system. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
\finger \markup \tied-lyric option for tie to appear above numbers
> I'm not top posting.
Hi folks, I'm working on a back score that requires the following:
{ d''2\finger \markup \tied-lyric #"1~4" }
but I can't seem to find a way to make the tie placement above the
numbers. Is there a way to override? Should an easier method be added.
I have tried the following with no luck:
\override Tie.direction = #UP
\tieUp
\tied-lyric #"1^~4"
etc
Eugene
--
Eugene Cormier
---
Full-time Instructor
Acadia University
www.eugenecormier.com
eugenecorm...@gmail.com
Office: Denton Hall Rm.235
Office Hours: Monday & Wednesday 10:30-11:30 (or by appointment)
Phone: (902) 585-1329
---
Statement of Confidentiality
This message (including attachments) may contain confidential or
privileged information intended for a specific individual or
organization. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify the sender immediately. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely
on this email, and should promptly delete this email from your entire
computer system.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: \hide c4 hides note head only
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 09:35:00PM -0400, Dan Eble wrote: > % Is this supposed to leave a stem showing? > \version "2.19.17" > \hide c''4 > — > Dan you mean \hideNotes right? Eugene -- Eugene Cormier --- Full-time Instructor Acadia University www.eugenecormier.com eugenecorm...@gmail.com Office: Denton Hall Rm.235 Office Hours: Monday & Wednesday 10:30-11:30 (or by appointment) Phone: (902) 585-1329 --- Statement of Confidentiality This message (including attachments) may contain confidential or privileged information intended for a specific individual or organization. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should promptly delete this email from your entire computer system. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Half-note head filled in when using shaped notes
> It appears only to happen on 2.18.2: not 2.18.0 or any 2.19.x variant on > Windows. I think it does not justify a new 2.18 release, so would suggest > either reverting to 2.18.0 if this is important to you, or moving to the > current development version. > > -- > Phil Holmes funny, on lilybin.com, it's not happening on 2.18.2, but does occur on 2.19.17... I'm not sure it's tied to a version, but maybe something to do with dep libs or fonts? Eugene > ___ > bug-lilypond mailing list > bug-lilypond@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond > -- Eugene Cormier --- Full-time Instructor Acadia University www.eugenecormier.com eugenecorm...@gmail.com Office: Denton Hall Rm.235 Office Hours: Monday & Wednesday 10:30-11:30 (or by appointment) Phone: (902) 585-1329 --- Statement of Confidentiality This message (including attachments) may contain confidential or privileged information intended for a specific individual or organization. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should promptly delete this email from your entire computer system. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: grace + multiple staves = multiple time sigs
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 10:23:39PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> Notation manual 1.2.6, Grace notes has a warning under Known issues and
> warnings.
> Any time you have a grace at (I believe just after) a bar line you must
> replicate
> the grace spacing in all staves. In your case \grace s8 will do.
>
> Many of us deal with this with a global that sets up time changes, etc
>
> global = { \time 4/4 s1 \time 3/4 \grace s8 s2. }
>
> \new Staff << \global { c''1 c''2. } >>
> \new Staff << \global { c''1 \grace b'8 c''2. } >>
>
> Usually I include the \global in the top staff ( or top of each group of
> staves).
> You may see how this relates to your solution.
>
> HTH
> Paul Scott
Ahh beautiful Paul, I've been using lilypond for a while so I haven't
actually looked at the docs for graces in a long while
And thanks for your solution... elegant :)
Cheers
Eugene
--
Eugene Cormier
---
Full-time Instructor
Acadia University
www.eugenecormier.com
eugenecorm...@gmail.com
Office: Denton Hall Rm.235
Office Hours: Monday & Wednesday 10:30-11:30 (or by appointment)
Phone: (902) 585-1329
---
Statement of Confidentiality
This message (including attachments) may contain confidential or
privileged information intended for a specific individual or
organization. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify the sender immediately. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely
on this email, and should promptly delete this email from your entire
computer system.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
grace + multiple staves = multiple time sigs
> I'm not top posting.
I'm pretty sure you guys already know about this, but I can't seem to find it
on the bug tracker.
If you have multiple staves with a time sig change and grace at the same time
we get duplicated time sigs:
<<
\new Staff { \time 4/4 c''1 \time 3/4 c''2. }
\new Staff { \time 4/4 c''1 \time 3/4 \grace b'8 c''2. }
>>
For now I've been getting around the problem by putting the time sig change
in only the staff with the grace
<<
\new Staff { \time 4/4 c''1 c''2. }
\new Staff { \time 4/4 c''1 \time 3/4 \grace b'8 c''2. }
>>
But obviously this will cause problems in a larger work with score and parts
Eugene
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: footnotes should work on markup attached to a note
Eugene Cormier gmail.com> writes:
> Hey guys,
>
> this works:
> { \markup { "rit" \footnote "*" "* text" }
Sorry for the mistake, but the first example should have been:
\markup { "rit" \footnote "*" "* text" }
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
footnotes should work on markup attached to a note
Hey guys,
this works:
{ \markup { "rit" \footnote "*" "* text" }
this does not:
{ c4_\markup { "rit" \footnote "*" "* text" } }
should it? I think so...
(tested on lilypond v2.18)
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: empty markup causes text overlapping in lilypond >2.17
David Nalesnik gmail.com> writes:
> Yes, this is something we can easily work with. It happened with \version
> 2.18 when you upgraded from 2.16?
yes, it never happened with lilypond <=2.16. When I made the upgrade to 2.18,
many of my previous theory worksheets became jumbled...
And I'd also like to mention the it doesn't only happen near the top headers.
I have another sheet where it happens between two lines of markup:
\markup { This text }
\markup { }
\markup { gets overlapped by this text }
Eugene
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: empty markup causes text overlapping in lilypond >2.17
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
> Without anything suitable for reproducing the problem, this is sort of
> anecdotal knowledge which severely reduces the chances of somebody
> actually working on it.
'suitable' is subjective and vague. I've never done this before, and I am
trying to help.
Is this better?
\header { title = TITLE subtitle = SUBTITLE }
\markup { }
\score { \repeat unfold 200 c'1 }
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: empty markup causes text overlapping in lilypond >2.17
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes: > > Anyway, for the purposes of the bug list, you should formulate your > > demonstration as a very short inline code snippet. > > That would be very much preferable from having to scrape some large > piece of code off an HTML page where it is embedded as some JavaScript > string inside of JavaScript code or whatever. agreed, but the problem is that to have the overlap happen we need enough 'other material on the page that forces the 'squeeze' Anyways, \markup \null does work perfectly, I just wanted to let people know that this behavior is happening ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
empty markup causes text overlapping in lilypond >2.17
So for years I've been making up theory worksheets with lilypond, and in
order to get extra vertical spacing between questions, I've used an empty
markup block like: \markup { }
since my upgrade to lilypond 2.18 I've noticed that when the empty markup
block is added, instead of putting an empty, invisible, line of text, it now
in fact freaks out and looses vertical space (like less than default, and
overlaps with previous elements)
Bug? regression? should it not work that way?
here's a small example
http://lilybin.com/0ntmpy/1
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
