Re: removing old stuff
Federico Bruni writes: > Don't know if one of these should be kept (not updated since 2009): > http://lilypond.org/blog/janneke/ > http://lilypond.org/blog/jan/ Wow, that's old. And all links are dead. OK to remove. Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version
David Kastrup writes: > Ah, this was a pure host compiler problem. Maybe because GCC is written > in C++ these days. Add a system:g++ dependency somewhere, instead of system:gcc IIRC Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?
Martin Tarenskeen writes: > As far as I know there is not a commonly accepted MIDI file event for > Clefs, like there is for Time Signature (FF 58 04) and Key Signature > (FF 59 02). But I guess it is possible for a Sequencer like Rosegarden > to put a special message in a "Sequencer Specific Meta-Event" (FF > 7F). Or in a text event (FF 01) which, according to the Standard > MIDI-File Format Spec 1.1 that I'm looking into now, can contain "Any > type of text containing anything". Yes, that's an interesting perspective. Why not talk to the Rosegarder guys and gals? Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?
Francisco Vila writes: > Maybe the clef event was generated by Rosegarden on import? That would not surprise me. There is a lot of smart heuristics you can think of to amend midi2ly. Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?
Francisco Vila writes: >> If MIDI has a way to encode >> clef information, then it's a bug. >> > > Yes it has. That's nice. If you have documentation you can point at, that would help. Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?
James writes: > Does it also matter that the clef is different when you run it back > through midi2ly (at least it was for me running 2.19.8) Yes, for 2.16.2 also. > I assume so in which case that is a second bug report right? If so, indeed a second report. For this one, the qualification of bug is even more disputable. If MIDI has a way to encode clef information, then it's a bug. Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?
Hi,
Running
lilypond bug.ly
midi2ly bug.midi
grep fis bug-midi.ly
produces
fis1
fis'4. d8*5
While technically correct, duration-wise, in printed output it
will look as if the d2 has been omitted. In other words
fis'4. d8 ~ d2
looks so much nicer! Tested with 2.16.2 and 2.19.11.
Greetings, Jan
\score {
\relative f
{
\tempo 4 = 130
\key d \major
\clef bass
fis1 fis'4. d8 ~ d2
d1
}
\layout{}
\midi{ }
}
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Lilypond Website Work
Federico Bruni writes: > 2013/12/6 Phil Burfitt > > Carl, you might also like to keep in mind Lilypond's search rankings while > you redesign. > This is really bad, I never checked it. > 1. improve SEO I guess I'm glad someone notices and seems to care http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-11/msg00258.html at last... Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Changing fingering numerals
Janek Warchoł writes: > More explanation: \finger doesn't mean "insert a fingering here". Rather, it means "use that funny time-signature-like font-MODELED-AFTER-ORATOR-WHICH-TRADITIONALLY-IS-ALSO-USED-IN-SMALL-SIZE-FOR-FINGERING for these glyphs". There, FTFY. Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Octaviation comma, apostrophe missing on easy text-input intro
Federico Bruni writes: > I don't think this is unreasonable. I think it is. Articulations, chords, chord names, lyrics, using variables, multiple staves are covered. > I agree, especially because updating all the .png images would be a pain... > until we decide to switch to SVG. I sent a proposal last year: These images with language strings are all generated from SVG, at least, they once were. We only use PNG on the website, which is okay. I'll see if I can whip up a patch. > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ > text-input-page-what-about-using-SVG-and-switch-element-td91310.html -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Octaviation comma, apostrophe missing on easy text-input intro
Hi, I just introduced a friend to LilyPond (using Frescobaldi). She asked how to change octaves, so I checked http://lilypond.org/text-input.en and found that, much to my surprise, octave steps are missing from that intro; which is otherwise very clear and covers both other basics and far more advanced concepts. Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hampered installation on Windows 7 pro
Hi, I experienced an unfriendly installation on Windows 7 pro, similar to what was mentioned in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-11/msg00226.html * You need to run lilypond-setup.exe as admininstator (even if you already have administrator rights * LilyPad with Welcome_to_LilyPond.ly does not pop up when you click on the lilypond icon, until after you explicitly run lilypond as admininstrator once After that, it works fine. It would be nice if these setup hurdles were fixed, or at least they should be documented for now. Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
segfault with 2.17.12
Hi,
I made this typo
\layout {
music = { }
{ \music }
and Lily segfaults on me.
Greetings,
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
3 or 4 pages?
Hi,
Why is this on four pages, it seems to fit on three.
This is with v2.17.12
#(set-default-paper-size "a8")
\paper
{
indent = 2\mm
tagline = #f
}
\relative c'
{
f2 f f4 f f f
f f f f f f f f
f f f f f f f f
f f f f f f f f
f f f f f f f f
f f f f f f f f
f f f f f f f f
f f f f f f f f
f f f f f f f f
f f f f f f f f
f f f f f f f f
f f f f f f f f
}
a8.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Fingering not aligned in 2.17, ok in 2.16
Nick Payne writes: >> Do you consider this a bug? Actually, I like the new behaviour >> better. What does the literature say? > > The great majority of commercial guitar scores I possess align the > fingering vertically on chords, as 2.16 does. Which means that there is no strict agreement? The great majority have been wrong before. What about the most beautiful scores amongst your collection, what do they do? Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
outdated German download page says MacOS X < 10.7
Hi, Have a look at this discussion https://twitter.com/IngoBartling/status/305981558257512448 Can we get an update for http://www.lilypond.org/macos-x.de.html asap? Thanks, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: "à" in title makes damaged pdf
Frédéric Bron writes: > It is due to a bug in ghostscript. I submitted a bug report 29th of > Nov (2012) and it is now corrected. But it will take time until the > new version of ghostscript comes to everybody's distribution. Do you have a patch to go with this? We could put the patch into GUB right away. Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi2ly failure
m...@mikesolomon.org writes: > On 17 déc. 2012, at 18:13, Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:07 PM, m...@mikesolomon.org >> Incidentally, why is the midi parser written in C? It seems unlikely >> to be a time bottleneck since midi files are normally pretty small, > > Go for it - the code was written in 2001, maybe at a time when > Python/computers were slower than they are now. It's 500-ish lines, > so good luck! There was at least one previous version of midi2ly. I'm not sure if that version was fully in Python or in C++. I seem to remember we tried doing everything in Python and it being about 20 to 100 times slower. For small midi files that does not matter much; so be sure to test with large midi files, ouverture coriolanus comes to mind. Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Fwd: [Feature request] attach lilypond code in pdf.
Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > If you open it in No need for that, evince shows the attachment fine. It would be nice if we could do this directly through GhostScript or a PostScript command. Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Lilypond fails to compile music on mac, segfaults on Linux
Graham Percival writes: > The whole report looks like a non-Tiny example, so politely reject > it I would say that if a file causes a segfault, the need for a Tiny-example can possibly be relaxed a bit. When Lily crashes, often the error location or fix is easy enough and more tinyness does not help. If that's not the case, the developer looking at the bug can always request a Tiny example to be made. Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1827 in lilypond: GUB failure for darwin-x86::cross/gcc target
> Jan, is it deliberate that we rely on the system having mfpr > installed? If so, we should add that to the README. Yes, sort of. We don't want it, of course, however adding it too tools gives nontrivial problems. Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Can’t compile LilyPond, libz.so error
Ejis writes: > I am trying to compile the version 2.14.1 but the build stops because > it seems that it can’t find libz.so, which is in my /usr/lib/. It is a fontforge [installation] problem: cd ./out && /usr/bin/fontforge -script emmentaler-11.pe Copyright (c) 2000-2011 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 13:48 GMT 22-Feb-2011. Library based on sources from 13:48 GMT 22-Feb-2011. libz.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Could not find the zlib library which is needed to understand WOFF Save Failed Generate: Save failed Called from... emmentaler-11.pe: line 52 make[1]: *** [out/emmentaler-11.otf] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs so you may need to talk to your fontforge maintainer. You can try running the fontforge command above and see what you need to do to get it to succeed. Good luck, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
[Jan Nieuwenhuizen] Cron 404 report
FYI - it seems [images on] big pages have been broken for quite a while now. Anyone reading/action on these reports? Jan --- Begin Message --- popularity page [referrer]... 180 /doc/v2.15/pictures/squiggle.jpg http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.es.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/lilypond-website.css http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.ja.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.nl.html 180 /doc/v2.15/pictures/lilypond-book.png http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.ja.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.nl.html 180 /doc/v2.15/pictures/frescobaldi-lilypond-editor-small.png http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.ja.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.nl.html 180 /doc/v2.15/pictures/flat-design.png http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.ja.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.nl.html 180 /doc/v2.15/pictures/double-lily-modified3.png http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.ja.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.nl.html 180 /doc/v2.15/pictures/color3-bg.png http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.es.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/lilypond-website.css http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.ja.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.nl.html 165 /doc/v2.15/pictures/text-input-pop-output.png http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.ja.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.nl.html 165 /doc/v2.15/pictures/text-input-2-output.png http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page.html http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/web-big-page [..] ___ Lilypond-cvs mailing list lilypond-...@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-cvs --- End Message --- -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
lyrics with musical intro?
Ben Engbers asked me for an example on how to set lyrics with a musical intro. Do we have something like this in the documentation? I only found a reply on lilypond-user by Mats that I reworked into two smaller snippets (see below). It may be worth having? Greetings, Jan intro.ly Description: Binary data intro-lyricsto.ly Description: Binary data -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
v2.13.48 docball adds offline-root/ directory...
...and thus breaks documentation links, notably info pages. This will probably happen in all binary builds, it happens in GUB. 12:54:19 janneke@abc:/var/www/lilypond/download/binaries/documentation $ tar taf lilypond-2.13.47-1.documentation.tar.bz2 | grep /examples.html ./share/doc/lilypond/html/examples.html ./share/doc/lilypond/html/Documentation/web/examples.html 12:56:23 janneke@abc:/var/www/lilypond/download/binaries/documentation $ tar taf lilypond-2.13.48-1.documentation.tar.bz2 | grep /examples.html ./share/doc/lilypond/html/offline-root/examples.html ./share/doc/lilypond/html/offline-root/Documentation/web/examples.html 12:58:58 janneke@abc:/var/www/lilypond/download/binaries/documentation With this change, quite possibly we need all distribution maintainers to update/change their build scripts. Is this intentional? Can this be reverted? Do we need to warn package maintainers (how?). Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi bug remains in 2.13.58
- Hu Haipeng writes:
The patch below may fix this, when using
\set Score.midiChannelMapping = #'staff
> Ok, Here's my example, just 4 bars.
It is indeed just 4 bars. Although I can look at the warning,
this example is not usable as a regtest or tiny example. It
is still quite difficult [for me] to verify that what is meant
in this .ly, actually arrives into the .midi.
Possibly with something like
violin = { \set Staff.midiInstrument = "violin" a4 a }
changer = {
\set Staff.midiInstrument = "midi-instr 1"
c128
\set Staff.midiInstrument = "midi-instr 2"
c128
..
\set Staff.midiInstrument = "midi-instr 17"
c128
\set Staff.midiInstrument = "celesta"
c4
}
it would be feasible to verify that, in the end, we hear a
violin and a celesta. Not sure how to make a better test
for this that could serve as a regtest.
Jan.
>From e0524f8ebdd4bcf908b8e3bce66e09670b8c30ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:08:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] MIDI: in midiChannelMapping = #'staff mode, keep to one channel. Fixes #.
---
lily/staff-performer.cc |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lily/staff-performer.cc b/lily/staff-performer.cc
index 5aafabe..90fe5d7 100644
--- a/lily/staff-performer.cc
+++ b/lily/staff-performer.cc
@@ -216,6 +216,9 @@ Staff_performer::get_channel (string instrument)
? channel_map_
: static_channel_map_;
+ if (channel_ && channel_mapping == ly_symbol2scm ("staff"))
+return channel_;
+
map::const_iterator i = channel_map.find (instrument);
if (i != channel_map.end ())
return i->second;
--
1.7.1
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Deprecate /cygwin/foo/bar/ online doc links?
Valentin Villenave writes: > A French user has just posted this link to the documentation: > http://lilypond.org/cygwin/release/lilypond/lilypond-doc/x/usr/share/doc/lilypond/html/Documentation/index.html *cough* > It does work, but seems awfully complicated. Do we really want to > maintain these URLs? How about a 301 "moved permanently" redirection, > that would override the browsers url? This was a stupid oversight, it's gone now. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi bug remains in 2.13.58
- Hu Haipeng writes: > Lilypond 2.13.58 still has bug on mid output. > For example, I have a full orch score with 14 sounds plus > perc. Then I change strings to pizz, and then violin I as solo violin, > then trumpet muted. Can you try if setting \set Score.midiChannelMapping = #'staff (the default being 'instrument) works for you? The default 'instrument mapping does not anticipate changing the midi instrument on a staff. If 'staff works for you, we should consider using that as a default, or try to allow for instrument changes mid staff. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Critical bug of midi output in 2.13.57
Werner LEMBERG writes: >> I can't make a much smaller example, but this correctly produces >> portion of the midi problem in 2.13.57. In a large orchestral piece, >> the situation becomes even worse, all instruments sounds at once like >> a pan of boiling water. > > Here is a minimal example which exhibits the problem with skipped > rests. It is related to the \f: If you remove it, everything works > fine. Thanks! Accepted as bug #1593 and fixed in HEAD. Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi2ly crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in convert_midi()
Francisco Vila schreef op vr 18-03-2011 om 23:50 [+0100]: > 2011/3/18 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : > > Francisco Vila schreef op vr 18-03-2011 om 18:57 [+0100]: > >> 2011/3/18 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : > > Eek, why not PATH=$(pwd)/out/bin:$PATH midi2ly ? > > This way both commands work perfectly. Does this imply that make > install is not doing its work? No, it just means that you're most probably not running the midi2ly (or importing the lilylib.py) that you think you're running (or importing). > The good news is that reverting the patch both commands become broken again. Good, I think we should apply it, then. > in my case it's /usr/local/share/lilypond/... Sure > No, I've put that mark but it is not shown. We are not using that > very function. Why on Earth? We are using it, but you're running a different file. def display_encode (s): print 'Yes we are here' return s.encode (sys.stderr.encoding or 'utf-8', 'replace') 23:57:19 janneke@vuurvlieg:~/vc/lilypond $ LANG=C PATH=~/vc/lilypond/out/bin:$PATH midi2ly minué Yes we are here LY output to `minu?-midi.ly'... Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi2ly crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in convert_midi()
Francisco Vila schreef op vr 18-03-2011 om 18:57 [+0100]:
> 2011/3/18 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
> i.e. your second patch is applied. Then I do
>
> rm python/*.pyc
> make -C python/
> make
> sudo make install
Eek, why not PATH=$(pwd)/out/bin:$PATH midi2ly ?
> midi2ly minué.midi
> LANG= midi2ly minué.midi
> LANG=C midi2ly minué.midi
> LANG=c midi2ly minué.midi
> convert-ly minué.ly
> LANG= convert-ly minué.ly
> LANG=C convert-ly minué.ly
> LANG=c convert-ly minué.ly
>
> all fail with
Weird. It says: replace and that's what happens over
here. Can you please double-check that the function with
'replace' is being used? Eg, edit
/usr/share/lilypond/2.13.55/python/lilylib.py
to read
def display_encode (s):
print 'Yes we are here'
return s.encode (sys.stderr.encoding or 'utf-8', 'replace')
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
RE: midi2ly crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in convert_midi()
Christian Fillion schreef op vr 18-03-2011 om 12:16 [-0400]: > Here a full report generated by Apport (on Ubuntu 10.10). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilypond/+bug/714213 Yes, I've seen that. This should be fixed by my first patch, even. I need the specifics to produce te crash with my second patch applied. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi2ly crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in convert_midi()
Francisco Vila schreef op vr 18-03-2011 om 17:03 [+0100]: > New patch applied, 'convert-ly minué.ly' and midi2ly minué.midi still > fail, sorry. Well, thanks for testing I guess... However, if there's any chance of me fixing this, I'm going to need a bit more information. For example, what's your locale. Does LANG=c ... midi2ly also fail? What's the exact command you use? What's the error message. Things like that. ;-) Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi2ly crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in convert_midi()
Francisco Vila schreef op vr 18-03-2011 om 12:46 [+0100]:
> 2011/3/14 Graham Percival :
> File "/usr/local/bin/midi2ly", line 1047, in convert_midi
> progress (_ ("%s output to `%s'...") % ('LY', out_file))
> UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position
> 4: ordinal not in range(128)
>
> patch in
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-03/msg00420.html
> from Jan is applied.
Interesting. For me it works (see below). I assume you did
make -C python?
Waitaminute. Ah, I have a utf-8 locale. You must set LANG=C
for it to break. see below below. With new patch.
Jan.
16:11:00 janneke@vuurvlieg:~/vc/lilypond
$ PATH=~/vc/lilypond/out/bin:$PATH lilypond minué
GNU LilyPond 2.13.55
Verwerken van `minué.ly'
Ontleden...
minué.ly:0: waarschuwing: geen \version uitdrukking gevonden, voeg
\version "2.13.55"
toe voor toekomstige compatibiliteit
Vertolken van muziek...
MIDI uitvoer naar minué.midi...
succes: Samenstellen met succes voltooid
16:11:18 janneke@vuurvlieg:~/vc/lilypond
$ PATH=~/vc/lilypond/out/bin:$PATH midi2ly minué
LY uitvoer naar `minué-midi.ly'...
=
$ PATH=~/vc/lilypond/out/bin:$PATH LANG=c midi2ly minué
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/janneke/vc/lilypond/out/bin/midi2ly", line 1207, in
main ()
File "/home/janneke/vc/lilypond/out/bin/midi2ly", line 1204, in main
convert_midi (f, o)
File "/home/janneke/vc/lilypond/out/bin/midi2ly", line 1047, in
convert_midi
progress (_ ("%s output to `%s'...") % ('LY', out_file))
File "/home/janneke/vc/lilypond/out/bin/midi2ly", line 106, in
progress
ly.encoded_write (errorport, s + '\n')
File
"/home/janneke/vc/lilypond/out/lib/lilypond/current/python/lilylib.py",
line 57, in encoded_write
f.write (s.encode (f.encoding or 'utf-8'))
UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xe9' in
position 18: ordinal not in range(128)
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
>From e72b10e90e8fec6f19866f2165bc1f16179426f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:44:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] lilylib: handle encodings. Fixes #1073 and u#714213.
---
python/lilylib.py | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/python/lilylib.py b/python/lilylib.py
index 3bf77f6..6fb96bb 100644
--- a/python/lilylib.py
+++ b/python/lilylib.py
@@ -47,13 +47,19 @@ underscore = _
# Urg, Python 2.4 does not define stderr/stdout encoding
# Maybe guess encoding from LANG/LC_ALL/LC_CTYPE?
+reload (sys)
+sys.setdefaultencoding ('utf-8')
+import codecs
+sys.stdout = codecs.getwriter ('utf8') (sys.stdout)
+sys.stderr = codecs.getwriter ('utf8') (sys.stderr)
+
def encoded_write(f, s):
-f.write (s.encode (f.encoding or 'utf_8'))
+f.write (s.encode (f.encoding or 'utf-8', 'replace'))
# ugh, Python 2.5 optparse requires Unicode strings in some argument
# functions, and refuse them in some other places
def display_encode (s):
-return s.encode (sys.stderr.encoding or 'utf_8')
+return s.encode (sys.stderr.encoding or 'utf-8', 'replace')
# Lilylib globals.
program_version = '@TOPLEVEL_VERSION@'
--
1.7.1
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi2ly crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in convert_midi()
Graham Percival schreef op ma 14-03-2011 om 11:31 [+]: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:26:42AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Dmytro O. Redchuk schreef op ma 14-03-2011 om 11:16 [+0200]: > It's just not > fair to Dmytro if he's always catching up on issues that people on > the weekend ignored. Sorry, I did not mean to imply that Dmytro should take care of this. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi2ly crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in convert_midi()
Dmytro O. Redchuk schreef op ma 14-03-2011 om 11:16 [+0200]: > On Fri 11 Mar 2011, 16:30 Christian Fillion wrote: > > > I'm not top posting. > Hi! > > > Here the full report (Launcgpad) : > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilypond/+bug/714213 > > It is http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1073 , isn't it? > > Can anyone clarify, please? It's easy: * reproduce the crash * apply the patch * see if it's fixed * report success and commit the fix, or report failure Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: MIDI output
Mario Bolognani schreef op ma 14-03-2011 om 08:47 [+]: > > I'm not top posting. > > % When simultaneous voices occur on a staff > % the MIDI instrument switches to grand piano > > \version "2.13.54" Thanks for the report; this is fixed in .55 I would appreciate a complete working example next time: I had to fill-in some notes and you never know if that changes behaviour. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Problem with MIDI volume level
Zoltan Selyem schreef op di 08-03-2011 om 10:34 [+0100]: > %% Changes in volume affect all the staves in the MIDI output > %% instead of affecting only the one they are written in. > %% > %% This went wrong between 2.13.52 and 2.13.53 Thanks. This should now be fixed. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi channel warning is gone
Keith OHara schreef op do 10-03-2011 om 18:48 [-0800]: > The message > warning: MIDI channel wrapped around > warning: remapping modulo 16 > has gone away in 2.12.53 This is now "fixed", the warning (and orchestral sound) is back. Or better yet, you only get the warning if you add \set Score.midiChannelMapping = #'staff or change the duplicate acoustic grand and violin instruments. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: ps to pdf conversion fails
Phil Holmes schreef op za 18-12-2010 om 11:23 [+]: > This normally occurs when it's not possible to delete the previous version > of the PDF - often because it's open in a PDF viewer. Try deleting the old > version and see if that fixes it. Well, the error message could be clearer, esp. as this cause is so well known. This also goes for gs. Any takers? Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 1226 in lilypond: lilypond-book in the MinGW release is currently unusable (2.13.30?)
Op maandag 23-08-2010 om 17:07 uur [tijdzone +], schreef lilyp...@googlecode.com: > Unfortunately, it seems that in GUB, python is not built with that python > module, so of course the subprocess module refuses to laod. I have been working on this and the latest gub does build this. It seems however, that the msvcrt.dll was not being installed *and* wine comes with an msvcrt.dll - so current gub ships a broken subprocess module. I hope to have this fixed rsn. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 834 in lilypond: midi2ly broken on Windows systems
Op woensdag 09-06-2010 om 13:34 uur [tijdzone +], schreef lilyp...@googlecode.com: > It does work as expected on my Virtualbox VM. Yay! > Jan, I assume your gmail address has a PayPal account attached to it? :) Uh, nope that's jann...@gnu.org :-) Fixed now, thanks!! Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
pseudo-filter from stdin is broken
A probably well-meant warning actually crashes
lilypond when processing stdin.
It seems it warns about the fact that
ghostscript - or our ghostscript command -
cannot handle file names that start with "-".
Not sure why we don't rename "-" to "stdin"
and then cat stdin.
14:00:44 jann...@vuurvlieg:~
$ echo '{ a b c }' | LANG= lilypond -
Processing `-'
Parsing...
-:0: warning: no \version statement found, please add
\version "2.12.3"
for future compatibility
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Finding the ideal number of pages...
Fitting music on 1 page...
Drawing systems...
Layout output to
`-.ps'.../usr/share/lilypond/2.12.3/scm/framework-ps.scm:647:9: In procedure
simple-format in expression (ly:warning (_ "cannot convert to ~S"
"PDF")):
/usr/share/lilypond/2.12.3/scm/framework-ps.scm:647:9: FORMAT: Missing argument
for ~S
[1]14:05:20 jann...@vuurvlieg:~
Note that the \version statement is funny, stdin
has no future?
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
Avatar®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl| http://lilypond.org
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Running under Snow Leopard
Op zaterdag 31-10-2009 om 18:42 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Graham Percival: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Graham Percival > wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:46:00PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > >> Maybe we could try bumping Freetype and Fontconfig to the latest >libtool: compile: unable to infer tagged configuration >libtool: compile: specify a tag with `--tag' I presume this has been resolved while I was "studying" to become a snowboard intstructor. However, see freetype.py for a libtool tag=.. fixup. Apropos updating, see bin/gupdate :-) Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter Avatar®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl| http://lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: STEPMAKE_GETTEXT works incorrectly
On wo, 2009-07-22 at 00:15 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > Do you really consider it a good idea that a4local.m4 is part of the > build system (i.e, stepmake) instead of the package itself? Or is > there a different m4 file used for package specific configuration? Yes, the package-specific stuff goes in configure.in. > And finally, is the stepmake project itself still alive, possibly used > by another project? Well, I think it's dead. > I've always wondered about the additional > complexity of the makafiles... The idea was to move any/most complexity from a package's makefiles [eg, flower/GNUmakefile, lily/GNUmakefile] to stepmake/; Stepmake maintainers would love makefile complexity, while package maintainers would appreciate simplicity [and speed, think automake]. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter Avatar®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl| http://lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 793 in lilypond: lilypad editor no longer available in Windows GUB builds
On di, 2009-07-14 at 14:56 +, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote: > New issue 793 by v.villenave: lilypad editor no longer available in Windows > GUB builds > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=793 Fixed in GUB http://github.com/janneke/gub/commit/ed055d901c910ddf210895e34894db8cb83eb0ab Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter Avatar®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl| http://lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: STEPMAKE_GETTEXT works incorrectly
On vr, 2009-06-05 at 09:38 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > After having applied my patch and called autogen.sh, I no longer get > > the warning, but it seems from config.log that gettext test is done > > with gcc and not g++: > > There is an explicit call to AC_LANG_C in the top-level `configure.in' > file, which should be removed IMHO. Ideally, everything should be run > with C++ (we only use g++), and the AC_LANG_PUSH/POP trickery -- `also > in aclocal.m4' -- should be removed, too. Quite possibly that's the best solution. However, note that aclocal.m4 is part of stepmake/, which was once designed to be a lilypond-independent modular simple makefile-build system. Forcing c++ would remove that feature... Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter Avatar®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl| http://lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: ReReRe: Bug report: measure numbering after repeat with alternative endings
Op zaterdag 27-06-2009 om 14:54 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Mats Bengtsson: > I could also imagine the conductors view at a rehearsal. > Still, the > formulation "most common" indicates that both strategies are used. Right, so this could be a choice. From my experience in an orchestra, it often happens that some instrumental parts are written out in full, ie, have no repeat, where other parts do have repeats. If you do not increase all bar numbers with each measure played, you are going to see "interesting" things in fully written-out parts :-) Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter Avatar®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl| http://lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 717 in lilypond: make python scripts work (better) in OSX 10.4
Op woensdag 24-06-2009 om 15:35 uur [tijdzone +], schreef codesite-nore...@google.com: > The actual substitution is done by the lilypond make system according to > the setting > in config.make. You need to change the lilypond configure stage in gub (2 > or 3) to > set TARGET_PYTHON=.. Yeah, but note that you must only do this for OSX, eg Linux builds need TARGET_PYTHON to be pointing at the gub-included python. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter Avatar®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl| http://lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Error running LilyPond through TeXShop on Leopard
Op woensdag 03-06-2009 om 16:00 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Alexander Crawford: > When I'd try to Typeset the code, > I kept getting > "set: Variable name must begin with a letter" > > what did I do wrong? Try emailing ivo bouwmans. It looks as if your tcsh script has some whitespace problems. Try this --- snip #! /bin/tcsh -x set path=($path /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin) lilypond --pdf "$1" # making sure there's a newline at EOF --- snip Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter Avatar®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl| http://lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: make web segfaults with 967b27d
Op vrijdag 16-01-2009 om 09:58 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Joe Neeman: > On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 15:57 +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Sorry about that, fixed now. I've made it spit out warnings, though, > since Rest_collision_engraver expects Rhythmic_column_engraver to > provide it with NoteColumns. Thanks. Yes, I was about to make a similar fix and was pondering on adding a programming error; but then I realised I didn't know what was going wrong at all... Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
make web segfaults with 967b27d
Make web segfaults for me [on linux-64]. .ly and backtrace
attached.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
\layout { \context {
\name ImproVoice
\type "Engraver_group"
\consists "Note_heads_engraver"
\consists "Text_engraver"
\consists Pitch_squash_engraver
squashedPosition = #0
\override NoteHead #'style = #'slash
\override Stem #'transparent = ##t
\alias Voice
}
\context { \Staff
\accepts "ImproVoice"
}}
\relative c'' {
a4 d8 bes8 \new ImproVoice { c4^"ad lib" c
c4 c^"undress" c_"while playing :)" c }
a1
}
(gdb) bt
#0 Grob::get_parent (this=0x1426a50, a=X_AXIS) at grob.cc:491
#1 0x005eaeb6 in Rest_collision_engraver::process_acknowledged (this=0x141a020) at rest-collision-engraver.cc:55
#2 0x006a7174 in Translator_method_binding::invoke (this=0x1418e60) at ./include/translator-group.hh:35
#3 0x006a6289 in Translator_group::precomputed_translator_foreach (this=0x141bdd0, idx=PROCESS_ACKNOWLEDGED) at translator-group.cc:280
#4 0x004b7470 in Engraver_group::do_announces (this=0x141bda0) at engraver-group.cc:157
#5 0x004b7432 in Engraver_group::do_announces (this=0x14b6cc0) at engraver-group.cc:151
#6 0x005f63c1 in Score_engraver::one_time_step (this=0x14b6cc0) at score-engraver.cc:141
#7 0x005f509d in Score_engraver::one_time_step_callback (self=0x14b6cc0, ev=0x7f773d70d590) at score-engraver.cc:134
#8 0x0052c10c in Listener::listen (this=0x13c9b00, ev=0x7f773d70d590) at listener.cc:32
#9 0x004a244c in Dispatcher::dispatch (this=0x13cc720, sev=0x7f773d70d590) at dispatcher.cc:139
#10 0x004a1147 in Dispatcher::broadcast (this=0x13cc720, ev=0x1426a10) at dispatcher.cc:162
#11 0x00497283 in Context::internal_send_stream_event (this=0x13d17e8, type=0x7f773ef6a980, origin=0x0, props=0x7fff4abec260) at context.cc:450
#12 0x004dd32d in Global_context::run_iterator_on_me (this=0x13d1760, iter=0x13ca0d0) at global-context.cc:159
#13 0x004dbb65 in ly_interpret_music_expression (mus=0x7f773d85cb90, ctx=0x7f773d795e00) at global-context-scheme.cc:108
#14 0x004dc506 in ly_run_translator (mus=0x7f773d85cb90, output_def=0x7f773d7f81c0) at global-context-scheme.cc:136
#15 0x005fb256 in Score::book_rendering (this=0x141cff0, layoutbook=0x141b150, default_def=0x14c81b0) at score.cc:146
#16 0x00464d6b in Book::process_score (this=0x141b2e0, s=0x7f773d7f8260, output_paper_book=0x141b330, layout=0x14c81b0) at book.cc:219
#17 0x00465c42 in Book::process (this=0x141b2e0, default_paper=0x14ac740, default_layout=0x14c81b0, parent_part=0x0) at book.cc:283
#18 0x00465c9e in Book::process (this=0x141b2e0, default_paper=0x14ac740, default_layout=0x14c81b0) at book.cc:190
#19 0x004640de in ly_book_process_to_systems (book_smob=0x7f773d83b1e0, default_paper=0x7f773db04f50, default_layout=0x7f773d9485a0, output=0x7f773efe3b20) at book-scheme.cc:92
#20 0x7f7742527da7 in scm_dapply () from /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
#21 0x7f7742528b28 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
#22 0x005b72e0 in internal_ly_parse_scm (ps=0x7fff4abecb40) at parse-scm.cc:65
#23 0x005b7368 in ly_parse_scm (s=0x135ae63 "(let ((book-handler (if (defined? 'default-toplevel-book-handler)\n", ' ' , "default-toplevel-book-handler\n", ' ' , "toplevel-book-handler)))\n (cond ((pair? toplevel-boo"..., n=0x7fff4abecdd8, i={start_ = 0x7fff4abecd30 "c®5\001", end_ = 0x7fff4abecdd8 "", source_file_ = 0x135ae63}, safe=false, parser=0x131c130) at parse-scm.cc:128
#24 0x006ca7cb in Lily_lexer::yylex (this=0x131c2b0) at lexer.ll:340
#25 0x006cd98c in yylex (s=0x7fff4abf0b00, loc=0x7fff4abeffa0, v=0x131c130) at parser.yy:2696
#26 0x006cf130 in yyparse (my_lily_parser=0x131c130) at out/parser.cc:2612
#27 0x006db679 in Lily_parser::do_yyparse (this=0x131c130) at parser.yy:2476
#28 0x005240f0 in Lily_parser::parse_file (this=0x131c130, init={static npos = 18446744073709551615, _M_dataplus = {> = {<__gnu_cxx::new_allocator> = {}, }, _M_p = 0x7fff4abf0eb0 "H.;\001"}}, name={static npos = 18446744073709551615, _M_dataplus = {> = {<__gnu_cxx::new_allocator> = {}, }, _M_p = 0x7fff4abf0ea0 "hR3\001"}}, out_name={static npos = 18446744073709551615, _M_dataplus = {> = {<__gnu_cxx::new_allocator> = {}, }, _M_p = 0x7fff4abf0e90 "¨.;\001"}}) at lily-parser.cc:110
#29 0x005220e5 in ly_parse_file (name=0x7f773edd3d20) at lily-parser-scheme.cc:122
#30 0x7f7742529f04 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
#31 0x7f7742527ff6 in scm_dapply () from /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
#32 0x7f774257fdef in scm_c_catch () from /us
Re: Freebsd-64 = dead link
Jean-Charles Malahieude writes: > I notice it is impossible to download both 2.10 and 2.11 for the > FreeBSD 64bits > > Is it due to the formating of the links in install-2.1x.ihtlm, which > seem identically to others, or something worse? The web scripts need to be updated. The 2.11 version can be downloaded from http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/freebsd-64 Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: make fails on freebsd 6.2 amd64
Nikita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I try to build lilypond on freebsd 6.2 amd64 machine. After installing all > required packages and configuring lilypond I tried gmake all and ended up > with > the following message. So, configure finds that yy_current_buffer does not exist, yet flex generates something that uses it. Can you double check that you are not using two versions of flex, eg one in /usr and one in /usr/local? If not, please send your config.h, config.log and lexer.cc. FWIW, I have added freebsd-64 to GUB and had no such problem building lilypond. Can you please verify if this installer works for you http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/freebsd-64/lilypond-2.11.28-1.freebsd-64.sh Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Kom niet verder met het programma lilypond 2.10.6-1
Schroen John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Na het installeren van lilypond 2.10.6-1 kom ik niet verder.
Wat is precies het probleem? [What is your problem?]
> op het scherm komt de volgende melding:
Heb je onderstaande instructies opgevolgd; wat gebeurde er? [Did you
follow the instructions below; what happened?]
Groetjes,
Jan.
> %{
> Welcome to LilyPond
> ===
>
> Congratulations, LilyPond has been installed successfully.
>
> Now to take it for the first test run.
>
> 1. Save this LilyPond file on your desktop.
> 2. Pick it up from the desktop with your mouse pointer, drag and drop
> it onto the LilyPond icon.
> 3. LilyPond automatically produces a PDF file from the musical scale
> below.
> 4. To print or view the result, click on the newly produced file called
>
> Welcome_to_LilyPond.PDF
>
> That's it. For more information, visit http://lilypond.org .
> %}
>
> \header{
> title = "A scale in LilyPond"
> }
>
> \relative{
> c d e f g a b c
> }
>
>
> \version "2.10.0" % necessary for upgrading to future LilyPond versions.
>
>
>
> Alvast bedankt,
>
>
> John Schroen
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Barline scans
Marnen Laibow-Koser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Then that was the luck of the draw. I basically chose a few books > more or less at random, and added some editions whose aesthetics I > like (such as Henle). I will be trying to enlarge my sample and > seeing if the numbers change. > > Or should I say: Congratulations, you found some heavily printed > editions. :) Thanks :-), but I knew where to look of course. When designing bar lines, we were looking for a practice that was backed by big houses, but also something interesting or exceptional(ly beautiful), rather than something too common and `looking also ok'. > Then this may be current practice. In that case, shouldn't Lilypond > keep up with the times? I'm not sure, can you tell me? We should not close our eyes to new practices, but look why things change rather than blindly following. LilyPond was started because we felt that current practice was going down, quality-wise. > Not at all. I love Henle's engraving, which is quite dark. > Lilypond's dark look is OK with me in general. I object to that one > point of barlines that are so much thicker than the staff lines. > I wonder. However, I'll bet that most people who think that Lilypond > output is ugly just don't bother to use the program or say anything. > I am trying to offer constructive suggestions so that Lilypond can > come closer to its stated goals. Okay, I'm very glad to hear that. Also, I apologise if I was a bit harsh. You put quite some effort in something that I haven't looked at for years, which is a very good thing. > I'm biased because I have a preference? That's ridiculous. I didn't (No offence intended, but it is a quite masterful mind that is not biased when it has made strong judgments.) > even *know* I thought thick barlines were ugly until I saw Lilypond's > use of them. And obviously, that's not the only factor: I don't think > Bärenreiter or Peters are ugly editions. That is interesting. When printed on my printer, LilyPond's staff and bar lines give the same impression as the two samples that I scanned (when scanned and measured, Lily's bar lines are thinner even, but that's why looking is so important). So what you find ugly *cannot* be the bar lines in itself: it must be that you see something else. It could be artifacts of you printer, it could be a font or spacing issue. Can you try to find what that is? >> Compromising into making our bar lines a bit thinner is not going >> to make him happy anyway. > > What makes you say that? That's also ridiculous. Good question. It must have been from what I read between the lines. Sorry, I'll take that back. > As I recall, Feta looks very little like Bärenreiter notation. If you > want to mimic Bärenreiter, perhaps an overhaul of the font is in order > -- after all, all the graphic details are interdependent to some > degree. No, I'm afraid that we cannot do that even if we would like to. I'm not even sure if we can say that we mimick Bärenreiter's bar lines (copyright-wise) but it is probably OK to be inspired editions of a select group of publishers. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Barline scans
Marnen Laibow-Koser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What do you mean by "further investigation"? My conclusion I was referring to Werner and Han-Wen. By further investigation, I meant looking at printed output; comparing with the originals that Lily's bar lines were designed from and trying to discover where it has gone awry. >> I am not sure where his measurement of 250% comes from, because we put >> 190% in, where baerenreiter (occasionally?) uses 220%. > > 250% came from an imprecise 300 dpi image. The 1200 dpi scan of > Lilypond's output indeed produced 190% (ok, 191%). Ok, but that means that LilyPond is on the black side of the scale rather than far off it. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Barline scans
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> In the scan that Marnen produced, all bar lines are thinner than >> Lily's, whereas in the two scans that I produced, Lily has the thinner >> bar lines. > > FWIW, I also have goodlooking scores with lighter barlines; my Wiener Urtext > of Brahms comes to mind. Yes, of course. So have I. It's just that Marnen asserts: off the charts---which is not true---upon which conclusions seem to be drawn, without further investigation. I am not sure where his measurement of 250% comes from, because we put 190% in, where baerenreiter (occasionally?) uses 220%. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Barline scans
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Perhaps you didn't follow the discussion, but Marnen provided several > 1200 dpi scans to support his case. Yes, I acknowledged that Marnen found some lightweight prints. There are quite a lot of those around. I just wanted to point out that if you find thick barlines ugly, you will likely produce scans that have light bar lines. In the scan that Marnen produced, all bar lines are thinner than Lily's, whereas in the two scans that I produced, Lily has the thinner bar lines. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Barline scans
Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Uh, oh, you are exaggerating. What you describe is definitely not the > usual case for Bärenreiter. More than the current factor is > *definitely* too much. It deviates too much from most other Well, maybe I am. But I'm feeling quite uneasy about the quick conclusions that are drawn here, without referring to printed materials, just because one person complains about a feature that he also happens to dislike. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Barline scans
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> before. If you want to see the images, they're at >> http://doko.ebon-askavi.homedns.org:8080/1200 . While the numbers are >> different, once again Lilypond's barlines are far thicker than any other >> edition relative to the staff lines: all other editions are in the >> 100%-138% range, while Lilypond weighs in at 191%! Congratulations, you found some lightly printed editions. I am aware that lightweight prints are (becoming) more common than heavyweight ones. Possibly you are used to that light look, which is fine. But this is not the (default) style that we try to mimick. I am sorry if you think this makes LilyPond prints ugly, but it seems to me that you stand alone in this. I have put up two scans at lilypond.org/~janneke/scans, to show you what we mean. You may want to read our Essay on engraving, it has something to say about blackness as well. Peters stem (=hair): 11px staff line: 13px bar line: 24px (220 % of hair) Baerenreiter staff (=hair): 10px stem: 12 px bar line: 22 px (220 % of hair) The funny thing is, that LilyPond has staff (=hair): 1 stem: 1.3 * hair bar: 1.9 * hair so it seems that in our default look our bar lines are not as heavy as Baerenreiter's. > thanks for your input. i'll keep it in mind when i'm fiddling with fonts > and blackness the next time. it might be a good idea to tune the bar size > down a bit (say: to 1.75), but i'll have to have a good look at the output > first. Well, we will also have to have a very good look at our Baerenreiter's instead of trying to please this one person with his quest for thinner bar lines. Note that Marnen has stated explicitly that he thinks that thick bar lines are ugly, so his input might be biassed. Compromising into making our bar lines a bit thinner is not going to make him happy anyway. If we want to mimick Baerenreiter, my quick scan suggests we should tune it up from 1.9 to 2.2, but we'd have to compare good printouts with the original. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Barlines are too thick
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We try to mimick German style engraving. Perhaps we should mention that > somewhere Yes, probably; and a quite black style. We have not yet seen an attempt at tweaking all default settings to produce a different style of typesetting, with LilyPond. Being able to define house styles could be a very interesting feature. As Han-Wen mentions, that would probably mean using a new font, or at least tweaking parameters of the feta font; a lot of work. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Web documentation automatic language
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'll add a routine to write .en.html symlinks in add-html-footer. > I hope I have enough time to send a complete patch tomorrow. Great. I already added something to add-html-header. > The docs internationalization is still in experimental state. Besides > this automatic language selection issue, there are other bugs that I'll > hopefully fix: > - "Other languages menu" is missing. Yes, this keeps coming up. It used to work... > - Node names with dashes are not translated. Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Web documentation automatic language
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, we are missing .en.html symlinks to the plain .html pages. This is fixed manually on lilypond.org, but we should have the new add-html-footer script should do this. Jonh? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Web documentation automatic language
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For example, I had problems with > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/user/lilypond/index Ok, we are missing .en.html symlinks to the plain .html pages. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Web documentation automatic language
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed the same problem on the 2.10 documentation pages yesterday, Can you identify one page that has the problem? > Setting the "Prefered language" to include English solves the problem, but > it's definitely a bug that the French version is the default if you haven't > configured your browser. Why would it not be a browser bug? But even if it is, may want to see if we can `fix' it by faking an english translation that points to the original. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Cannot compile lilypond (2.8.8, 2.10.1)
CSÉCSYLászló <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I want to update the lilypond package for frugalware, but I can't get it > compiling > http://frugalware.org/~boobaa/stuff/lilypond-2.10.1-1-i686.log That log says: Initializing FontConfig... error: failed adding font directory: /var/tmp/fst/src/lilypond-2.10.1/out/bin/../share/lilypond/2.10.1/fonts/otf/ Does that directory exist? > Please let me know if I have missed something, or what's wrong with the > buildscript, available online for lilypond-2.8.7 > http://ftp.frugalware.org/pub/frugalware/frugalware-current/source/xapps-extra/lilypond/FrugalBuild That's not enough to reproduce the error. Please show the exact configure and make commands that your build system uses. Better yet, by hand do ./configure; make; make install and see if that works. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Error
Sally Stokes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I click to install the stable version for Windows XP, I am > directed to an error page that states "The page cannot be > displayed." There was a problem with the server, this should be fixed now. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: broken example
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > Let's ship standchen to mutopia and drop it from the lily examples. We > already have morgenlied, which is basically the same. Jan? Yes; I do not even see it on the website? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Cygwin LilyPond 2.6.4 tex background doesn't work
Endre ZELENA writes: > $ lilypond -b tex --tex test.ly GNU LilyPond 2.6.4 can't dlopen: > libkpathsea.so: No such file or directoryinstall package: libkpath > sea3 (teTeX 2.x) or libkpathsea4 (teTeX 3.x)error opening kpathsea > libraryaborti ng > > Any help? You found a bug. This is fixed in lilypond CVS. I have no estimate on a new cygwin release, though. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Problem with emacs mode
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > This patch fails with emacs 21, so I cannot apply it. Applied it anyway and added emacs21 compatibility. Thanks, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Problem with emacs mode
Milan Zamazal writes: > I had to apply the following patch to make LilyPond 2.6.3 and 2.7.32 > work with CVS Emacs: > > --- lilypond-mode.el.orig 2006-02-12 15:58:09.0 +0100 > +++ lilypond-mode.el 2006-02-11 20:12:00.0 +0100 This patch fails with emacs 21, so I cannot apply it. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: lilypond error
Markus Koegel writes: Please use the mailing list. > i just emerged lilypond 2.6.4 onto my gentoo system and got the very same > error you once discussed in the "LilyPond development" Forum (April 2004): > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lilypond > GNU LilyPond 2.6.4 > ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: > ERROR: Unable to find file "lily.scm" in load path Is LilyPond supported by Gentoo? Emerged, doesn't that mean installed from source using a package manager? If so, please report your bug with the Gentoo LilyPond maintainer. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: bracket don't work ! (ligature brackets)
Juergen Reuter writes: > @ Han-Wen / Jan: > > At linking stage, I get hundreds of undefined reference errors. Here > are just the first one and last one: > std::string_compare(std::String const&, std::String const&)' Are you using latest CVS? Please clean and try CVS update, I think this problem has been fixed. > If I look at the flower library, I see that flower partially lives in > the std namespace: Thanks, that should have been fixed when the old code was removed. I'll have a look. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: convert-ly error in 2.7.32 Windows
Thomas Scharkowski writes: > I get the following error message (LilyPond 2.7.32, Windwos XP): > return m.group (1) > IndexError: no such group > Process convert-ly.py exited with code 1 > 2.7.31-2 worked. That is very odd. Could it be that you are in fact using an older version of python now? This will be fixed in the next release for older versions of python (see below), but on windows, convert-ly should be using the bundeled python2.4 anyway. Could you find out if you have an older version of python, and if/why you are usin that now? Jan. --- convertrules.py 06 feb 2006 10:38:22 +0100 1.37 +++ convertrules.py 08 feb 2006 11:17:01 +0100 @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ class FatalConversionError: conversions = [] error_file = sys.stderr -lilypond_version_re_str = 'version *\"[0-9.]+"' +lilypond_version_re_str = 'version *\"([0-9.]+)"' lilypond_version_re = re.compile (lilypond_version_re_str) -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.7.32 on windows: linewidth and leftmargin do not work
> convert-ly does not work What does that mean, bug report please? > with 2.7.32 here, neither on Windows nor on > Linux (Kanotix/Debian). Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: make fails (std::String)
Herman Grootaers writes: >> The problems are fixed in CVS. For .29, you may try your luck with >> ./configure --disable-optimising, or --enable-std-string . >> > The first option did the trick, the last option, and the combination of > both options went wrong. Switching between --enable-std-string and --disable-std-string only works after a make c-clean. > I wonder what distro's are you running to get Lilypond to run/compile at > such a fast rate of bugfixes/whish-lists?? Why do you ask? Han-Wen and I currently use Debian/unstable and latest Fedora core. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: make fails (std::String)
Nicolas Sceaux writes: > Thank you very much, Jan! You're welcome. Esp. considering it was me that broke this in the first place :-) Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: make fails (std::String)
Herman Grootaers writes: > It seems that the file ./include/string.icc is broken just for this > release. > > As I am not a programmer, I dont have a clue of what went wrong but > maybe the dev-team can come up with a quich fix of this problem. The problems are fixed in CVS. For .29, you may try your luck with ./configure --disable-optimising, or --enable-std-string . Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: SVG export
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Thanks for investigating this. What does the SVG spec say, is this a
> LilyPond or an IE 6.0 bug?
Looking at this page
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/coords.html
and especially
translate:
"translate" wsp* "(" wsp* number ( comma-wsp number )? wsp* ")"
reveals that this is a bug in IE 6.0. Would you please report your
bug with Microsoft instead? I am quite reluctant to implement
workarounds for bugs in Microsoft software. This is something that I
feel should at least be discussed.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: SVG export
Bass writes:
> SVG export puts space between "translate" and "(" in transform
> attribute of element.
>
> IE 6.0 registers this as an error. Removing space in SVG document
> opens SVG file sucessfully.
Thanks for investigating this. What does the SVG spec say, is this a
LilyPond or an IE 6.0 bug?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Error with lilypond
Alex So writes:
> C:/Program Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/2.7.27/ly/init.ly:28:0: error:
> syntax error, unexpected SCM_T
>
> #(if (and (ly:get-option 'old-relative)
>
> I just keep getting this no matter what i change.
Please be more specific. Have you tried reducing your score to
{ c }
If that works, then you do have a problem with your .ly file.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: No module named xml.dom XP SP2
Martin Van Diest writes: > Microsoft Windows XP SP2 > Lilypond 2.7 > ImportError: No module named xml.dom The xml part of the python library is stripped from the installer. This will be fixed in the next release. Thanks for the report. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Grand Unified Binaries: 2.7.27 release 3 available
John Wiedenhoeft writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lilypond --help
> bash: lilypond: command not found
What about:
hash -r
You may also have to uncomment
if [ -d ~/bin ] ; then
PATH=~/bin:"${PATH}"
fi
in your .bash_profile and do
bash --login.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Grand Unified Binaries: 2.7.27 release 3 available
John Wiedenhoeft writes: [please keep this on the list] >> Works for me on Ubuntu Breezy. But, it is linked to libstdc++6 (I >> probably broke this in GUB?), so it will probably fail on Hoary. > > Well I use Breezy too, and libstdc++6 is also installed. Could you > please tell me the exact steps you did to install LP? Maybe I missed > something. wget lilypond.org/download/binaries/linux-x86/lilypond-2.7.27-3.linux.sh chmod +x lilypond-2.7.27-3.linux.sh ./lilypond-2.7.27-3.linux.sh Can you please post the error that you get? We cannot fix it if all we know is: it breaks for me. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: midi2ly to ly 2.7.26.1-1 dont work in win2k
martial writes: > Oops ! > midi2ly don't work with 2.7.26.1 (and 2.7.23). > NameError: name 'datadir' is not defined I fixed this in CVS. The new version already has this fix, but may have other problems. Thanks for the reports. We're working hard to get everything in place. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Lilypond 2.7.26-3 and 2.7.26-4
martial writes: > win2k > Lilypond 2.7.26-3 and 2.7.26-4 error >>C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond.exe template_chorale.ly > ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: > ERROR: Unable to find file "lily.scm" in load path Thanks. This is fixed ni 2.7.26.1-1. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Where is python in 2.7.26-2 (Windows)
Frédéric Bron writes: > The binary of python has disappeared from the bin directory in > 2.7.26-2 > for Windows. Then it is not possible to run convert-ly. This is fixed in 2.7.26-3. Thanks for the report. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: LilyPond 2.6.4-5 installation "breaks " Windows
Bill Welch writes: > I have to say that from a Windows user's point of view, this is a very > serious bug that really should be in a stable version as soon as > possible. I've made lilypond-2.6.5-1.exe available, also as upgrade. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: LilyPond 2.6.4-5 installation "breaks " Windows
Mats Bengtsson writes: > I assume that you mean 2.7.26-2. Yes, thanks Mats. > Could you please make a corrected stable version as well? Good point. We haven't considered that yet. Han-Wen? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: LilyPond 2.6.4-5 installation "breaks " Windows
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: >> Manager\Environment. Normally it is type REG_EXPAND_SZ, but after >> the Lilypond install, it is simply a REG_SZ. This should be fixed in, and by, lilypond-2.6.26-2.exe. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: LilyPond 2.7.26 released
Sven Axelsson writes: > WinXP sp2. > > OK. The new release doesn't lokk too good. Text fonts are wrong - > looks like they are using the Feta font instead of whatever is the > normal default. Also, creating PNG output fails like this: This should be fixed in lilypond-2.6.26-2.exe. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: LilyPond 2.7.26 released
Martial writes: > D:\lilypond>lilypond -f png template_chorale.ly > ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: > ERROR: Unable to find file "ice-9/boot-9.scm" in load path This should be fixed in lilypond-2.6.26-2.exe. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: LilyPond 2.7.26 released
Martial writes: > Win2K > I confirme > D:\lilypond>lilypond -f png template_chorale.ly > ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: > ERROR: Unable to find file "ice-9/boot-9.scm" in load path Can you try with LILYPOND_VERBOSE=1, eg see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-06/msg00305.html and check if the GUILE_LOAD_PATH makes sense? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: LilyPond 2.6.4-5 installation "breaks " Windows
Bill Welch writes: > Sorry to send this directly, but it wasn't clear to me how to > respond to a thread in the archive. Ok. I am copying the list. There are several ways to do this, easiest is to read the gmane.org archives http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.bugs or post directly http://post.gmane.org/post.php?group=gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.bugs I now see that there is only a link to the static archives at gnu, and a separate post link to gmane. > Anyway, what I have found about this problem is that the path entry > in the registry has changed type after the Lilypond install. I'm > running XP Professional, and my path is in > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session > Manager\Environment. Normally it is type REG_EXPAND_SZ, but after > the Lilypond install, it is simply a REG_SZ. This means that the > %SystemRoot% variable (as well as other variables) aren't expanded > in the path for Cmd windows and anything else that needs the Path > variable. Oops, that is a silly bug. Thanks for the report, > To fix this locally, I have had to copy the current value of the > Path to the memory buffer, delete the entry in the registry, > recreate it as a REG_EXPAND_SZ, and paste my previous value. > Hopefully this will give you some clue to the original cause of the > problem. Thanks for the report. Can't the type of the key be changed more easily, without cut and paste? Sorry for the inconvenience, we have no windows gurus at lilypond development. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: LilyPond 2.6.4-5 installation "breaks " Windows
Mats Bengtsson writes: > Anyway, it seems that one solution would be to add the LilyPond path > at the end of the PATH environment variable. But we don't do that, because /cygwin/usr/bin may be in the PATH. So until we understand what's going on here, I suggest we do not change this. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: lilypond 2.7.22: compilation error
Andrzej Kopec writes: > And one more question: > how to make lilypond without documentation? It seems compiling chokes on > documentation... ./configure --disable-documentation. Hint: see ./configure --help Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Stem length in upper voice
liang seng writes: > Hi, I still don't get it. Have a look at nicely engraved scores. > How come? Evolution. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Stem length in upper voice
liang seng writes: > the stem length of the upper voices seems too short Why do you think they are too short? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: lilypond speed - ridiculously slow on windows xp
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > Jan, do you know where the USERPROFILE variable should come from? No. It might be set in several placen in the registry and may be overridden in a command shell. It might be built-in, but the documentation seems too vague to tell http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/ntcmds_shelloverview.mspx Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
