Re: 2.2.5 on windows 2k still not working (additional info)
In my opinion setup.exe does not misbehave. Windows users usually don't know what the difference is between a click and a double-click, and they do always double-click on every clickable thing. If they double click on lilypond, that is interpreted as two single clicks, so they get to 2.2.5-1. Perhaps we should propose cygwin setup's developers to handle double-clicks as a single click. Bert A note for the experts on the mailing list: A number of new Windows users have been hit by the same problem, namely that setup.exe suggests version 2.2.5 instead of version 2.4.x when you first run it. Can we update the information at http://lilypond.org/web/download/ in some way? Or find out why setup.exe misbehaves. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.2.5 on windows 2k still not working (additional info)
Bertalan Fodor writes: In my opinion setup.exe does not misbehave. Reading your analysis, I think it does. If they double click on lilypond, that is interpreted as two single clicks, so they get to 2.2.5-1. If this is what happens, then this is a bug. A double click is not two single clicks. Perhaps we should propose cygwin setup's developers to handle double-clicks as a single click. Yes, please do so. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.2.5 on windows 2k still not working (additional info)
Another question is why this problem has popped up the last few weeks, even though we have had two alternative versions of the package available in Cygwin for a long time (is it just since we haven't had the same incompatibility between the versions before, I doubt it)? /Mats Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Bertalan Fodor writes: In my opinion setup.exe does not misbehave. Reading your analysis, I think it does. If they double click on lilypond, that is interpreted as two single clicks, so they get to 2.2.5-1. If this is what happens, then this is a bug. A double click is not two single clicks. Perhaps we should propose cygwin setup's developers to handle double-clicks as a single click. Yes, please do so. Jan. -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.2.5 on windows 2k still not working (additional info)
It should never be necessary to set this variable yourself, it
should work out of the box. Do you, by chance, have an installation
of TeXLive on your machine?
/Mats
Rodrigo Figueiredo wrote:
Hi Mats,
I updated to lilypond 2.4.2. It didn't work yet. I used an export
TEXMF='{/usr/share/lilypond/2.4.2,/usr/share/texmf}' directive I saw on
the discussion list. Still not working. Some font was missing from Tex,
which was not installed. I installed it and it worked. I don't know what
to do re: updating the info on the page you suggest below.
Rodrigo
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Was my previous answer too cryptic? See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-01/msg00232.html
for an alternative formulation of the same answer.
However, the best recommendation is to rerun setup.exe and make sure
that version 2.4 of the lilypond package is installed.
A note for the experts on the mailing list: A number of new Windows
users have been hit by the same problem, namely that setup.exe
suggests version 2.2.5 instead of version 2.4.x when you first run it.
Can we update the information at http://lilypond.org/web/download/ in
some way? Or find out why setup.exe misbehaves.
/Mats
Rodrigo Figueiredo wrote:
Hi,
I've tried test.ly in both formats (DOS e Unix) with both lily-wins
and lilypond. The parser doesn't recognize properly the braces. Any
input on this is greatly appreciated,
TIA
Rodrigo
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.2.5 on windows 2k still not working (additional info)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another question is why this problem has popped up the last few weeks,
even though we have had two alternative versions of the package
available in Cygwin for a long time (is it just since we haven't had
the same incompatibility between the versions before, I doubt it)?
No, you're right. The previous example had
\score { \notes { c4-( c4-) } }
with - before the ( ) on purpose, so it would work with 1.8 to 2.2
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.2.5 on windows 2k still not working (additional info)
It is reported that sometimes installing the tetex-extra package solves installation problems. Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.2.5 on windows 2k still not working (additional info)
Hi Mats,
I updated to lilypond 2.4.2. It didn't work yet. I used an export
TEXMF='{/usr/share/lilypond/2.4.2,/usr/share/texmf}' directive I saw on
the discussion list. Still not working. Some font was missing from Tex,
which was not installed. I installed it and it worked. I don't know what
to do re: updating the info on the page you suggest below.
Rodrigo
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Was my previous answer too cryptic? See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-01/msg00232.html
for an alternative formulation of the same answer.
However, the best recommendation is to rerun setup.exe and make sure
that version 2.4 of the lilypond package is installed.
A note for the experts on the mailing list: A number of new Windows
users have been hit by the same problem, namely that setup.exe
suggests version 2.2.5 instead of version 2.4.x when you first run it.
Can we update the information at http://lilypond.org/web/download/ in
some way? Or find out why setup.exe misbehaves.
/Mats
Rodrigo Figueiredo wrote:
Hi,
I've tried test.ly in both formats (DOS e Unix) with both lily-wins
and lilypond. The parser doesn't recognize properly the braces. Any
input on this is greatly appreciated,
TIA
Rodrigo
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: 2.2.5 on windows 2k still not working (additional info)
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
It should never be necessary to set this variable yourself, it
should work out of the box.
As far as the install I did from the redhat ftp site, it did not.
Do you, by chance, have an installation
of TeXLive on your machine?
I guess there is none, but I am really sure what to look for. I
installed Tex addtional base libraries and other Tex stuff. I haven't
seen anywhere in the doc a ref to TeXLive.
Rodrigo
/Mats
Rodrigo Figueiredo wrote:
Hi Mats,
I updated to lilypond 2.4.2. It didn't work yet. I used an export
TEXMF='{/usr/share/lilypond/2.4.2,/usr/share/texmf}' directive I saw
on the discussion list. Still not working. Some font was missing from
Tex, which was not installed. I installed it and it worked. I don't
know what to do re: updating the info on the page you suggest below.
Rodrigo
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Was my previous answer too cryptic? See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-01/msg00232.html
for an alternative formulation of the same answer.
However, the best recommendation is to rerun setup.exe and make sure
that version 2.4 of the lilypond package is installed.
A note for the experts on the mailing list: A number of new Windows
users have been hit by the same problem, namely that setup.exe
suggests version 2.2.5 instead of version 2.4.x when you first run it.
Can we update the information at http://lilypond.org/web/download/ in
some way? Or find out why setup.exe misbehaves.
/Mats
Rodrigo Figueiredo wrote:
Hi,
I've tried test.ly in both formats (DOS e Unix) with both lily-wins
and lilypond. The parser doesn't recognize properly the braces. Any
input on this is greatly appreciated,
TIA
Rodrigo
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
