Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13

2011-06-09 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 04:14:25PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> I think the Spanish page is not being generated, so yes, linking to
> English as other languages do is the next bad thing.  A Spanish PDF is
> being generated and correctly linked; therefore, please, if any,
> change only the two first link refs.

Thanks, added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1685

Cheers,
- Graham

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13

2011-06-09 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:37:52AM +0200, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> CHANGES is showing "New features in 2.13 since 2.12".
> Shoudln't it be updated to ""New features in 2.14" etc. ?

This is fixed in git, but it will only update on the web when I
make a new 2.14.1 release.  I would like to do this right now, but
I am blocked due to
  http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1615

I have no estimate on when this will be fixed.

Sorry,
- Graham

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13

2011-06-07 Thread Francisco Vila
2011/6/7 Graham Percival :
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:14:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2011/6/7 Graham Percival :
>> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> >> BTW http://lilypond.org/changes.es.html has broken links to both
>> >> split+bigpage Changes page. PDF link is right.
>> >> Other languages show a mix of broken links and English pages.
>> >
>> > Well, if
>> >  http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/changes/index.es.html
>> > is the wrong url, then what's the right one?
>>
>> It is not that easy.  You know that we do not write urls in web
>> texinfo files.  The resulting URL is a crazy combination of refs,
>> macros, post processing and luck.  In my offline copy, split link does
>> work, bigpage link doesn't.
>
> I know.  I'm not asking for a fix.  I'm asking what the online URL
> is of the changes document in spanish.
>
>> In http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/web/changes.es.html ,
>> links do work.
>
> On that webpage, the html links go to English changes; only the
> pdf link goes to Spanish.  If you're happy with that, then I can
> make the website do the same thing.

I think the Spanish page is not being generated, so yes, linking to
English as other languages do is the next bad thing.  A Spanish PDF is
being generated and correctly linked; therefore, please, if any,
change only the two first link refs.

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13

2011-06-07 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:14:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2011/6/7 Graham Percival :
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> >> BTW http://lilypond.org/changes.es.html has broken links to both
> >> split+bigpage Changes page. PDF link is right.
> >> Other languages show a mix of broken links and English pages.
> >
> > Well, if
> >  http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/changes/index.es.html
> > is the wrong url, then what's the right one?
> 
> It is not that easy.  You know that we do not write urls in web
> texinfo files.  The resulting URL is a crazy combination of refs,
> macros, post processing and luck.  In my offline copy, split link does
> work, bigpage link doesn't.

I know.  I'm not asking for a fix.  I'm asking what the online URL
is of the changes document in spanish.

> In http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/web/changes.es.html ,
> links do work.

On that webpage, the html links go to English changes; only the
pdf link goes to Spanish.  If you're happy with that, then I can
make the website do the same thing.

Cheers,
- Graham

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13

2011-06-07 Thread Francisco Vila
2011/6/7 Graham Percival :
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> BTW http://lilypond.org/changes.es.html has broken links to both
>> split+bigpage Changes page. PDF link is right.
>> Other languages show a mix of broken links and English pages.
>
> Well, if
>  http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/changes/index.es.html
> is the wrong url, then what's the right one?

It is not that easy.  You know that we do not write urls in web
texinfo files.  The resulting URL is a crazy combination of refs,
macros, post processing and luck.  In my offline copy, split link does
work, bigpage link doesn't.

In http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/web/changes.es.html ,
links do work.  If I change the source, for sure I am fixing a link
just to break another.  That has a solution or another, but finding it
requires more time than I currently have.
-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13

2011-06-07 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> BTW http://lilypond.org/changes.es.html has broken links to both
> split+bigpage Changes page. PDF link is right.
> Other languages show a mix of broken links and English pages.

Well, if
  http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/changes/index.es.html
is the wrong url, then what's the right one?

Cheers,
- Graham

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13

2011-06-07 Thread Francisco Vila
2011/6/7 Graham Percival :
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:55:08PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> > It looks easy to fix this; however, the string is intended to show new
>> > features in current development since latest stable.  When 2.15 comes
>> > out, it should be changed to "2.15 since 2.14".
>>
>> Patch attached.
>
> Already done on master for the English docs, but not for
> translations.

Done in Spanish and pushed to master. Other languages don't have this
file translated.

BTW http://lilypond.org/changes.es.html has broken links to both
split+bigpage Changes page. PDF link is right.
Other languages show a mix of broken links and English pages.

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13

2011-06-07 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:55:08PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> > It looks easy to fix this; however, the string is intended to show new
> > features in current development since latest stable.  When 2.15 comes
> > out, it should be changed to "2.15 since 2.14".
> 
> Patch attached.

Already done on master for the English docs, but not for
translations.

Cheers,
- Graham

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13

2011-06-07 Thread Francisco Vila
2011/6/7 Francisco Vila :
> 2011/6/7 Xavier Scheuer :
>> On 7 June 2011 09:37, Xavier Scheuer  wrote:
>>> Congratulations for the release of 2.14!
>>>
>>> CHANGES is showing "New features in 2.13 since 2.12".
>>> Shoudln't it be updated to ""New features in 2.14" etc. ?
>
> It looks easy to fix this; however, the string is intended to show new
> features in current development since latest stable.  When 2.15 comes
> out, it should be changed to "2.15 since 2.14".

Patch attached.

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
From b6f88e1a4da9aa7289ce3b69a55661813995111c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francisco Vila 
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:54:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Say 2.14 since 2.12 in Changes.

---
 Documentation/changes.tely|2 +-
 Documentation/es/changes.tely |2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/changes.tely b/Documentation/changes.tely
index 150f603..d61f0fc 100644
--- a/Documentation/changes.tely
+++ b/Documentation/changes.tely
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ See user manual, \NAME\
 @finalout
 
 @node Top
-@top New features in 2.13 since 2.12
+@top New features in 2.14 since 2.12
 
 @allowcodebreaks false
 
diff --git a/Documentation/es/changes.tely b/Documentation/es/changes.tely
index ae6370d..905a6af 100644
--- a/Documentation/es/changes.tely
+++ b/Documentation/es/changes.tely
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Véase el manual del usuario, \NAME\
 @finalout
 
 @node Top
-@top Funcionalidades nuevas de la versión 2.13 desde la 2.12
+@top Funcionalidades nuevas de la versión 2.14 desde la 2.12
 
 @allowcodebreaks false
 
-- 
1.7.0.4

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13

2011-06-07 Thread Francisco Vila
2011/6/7 Xavier Scheuer :
> On 7 June 2011 09:37, Xavier Scheuer  wrote:
>> Congratulations for the release of 2.14!
>>
>> CHANGES is showing "New features in 2.13 since 2.12".
>> Shoudln't it be updated to ""New features in 2.14" etc. ?

It looks easy to fix this; however, the string is intended to show new
features in current development since latest stable.  When 2.15 comes
out, it should be changed to "2.15 since 2.14".

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13

2011-06-07 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 7 June 2011 09:37, Xavier Scheuer  wrote:
> Congratulations for the release of 2.14!
>
> CHANGES is showing "New features in 2.13 since 2.12".
> Shoudln't it be updated to ""New features in 2.14" etc. ?

I forgot the link:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/changes/index.html

Cheers,
Xavier

-- 
Xavier Scheuer 

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


CHANGES -> 2.14 instead of 2.13

2011-06-07 Thread Xavier Scheuer
Congratulations for the release of 2.14!

CHANGES is showing "New features in 2.13 since 2.12".
Shoudln't it be updated to ""New features in 2.14" etc. ?

Cheers,
Xavier

-- 
Xavier Scheuer 

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond