Re: Index entries leading to @seealso

2008-10-21 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Trevor,

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just noticed that there are many entries in the index to the Notation
> Reference which lead you to the @seealso sections.  It seems that the @r..{}
> macros generate index entries automatically.  But these entries are pretty
> useless as they take to the place where the reference is made, rather than
> the place being referenced.  For example, look at the entries for
> "fingering".
>
> Should this be classified as a documentation bug?

I would consider this a bug.  Since the index entries for the main
docs jump straight to correct position on the page, additional entries
for the @r... in @seealso aren't as useful IMO.  In addition, many of
the @seealso links are duplicated in the main docs, so these index
entries are redundant.

-Patrick


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Index entries leading to @seealso

2008-10-21 Thread Trevor Daniels
I've just noticed that there are many entries in the index to the Notation 
Reference which lead you to the @seealso sections.  It seems that the @r..{} 
macros generate index entries automatically.  But these entries are pretty 
useless as they take to the place where the reference is made, rather than 
the place being referenced.  For example, look at the entries for 
"fingering".


Should this be classified as a documentation bug?

Trevor





___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond