Issue 1636 in lilypond: midiVolume 0.0 not respected

2011-04-25 Thread lilypond

Status: Accepted
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical Regression

New issue 1636 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: midiVolume 0.0 not respected
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1636

Setting midi volume to 0.0 for some instruments is very useful for  
proofreading (proof-listening) scores.  With the current mixed  
implementation of dynamics as part MIDI velocity, part MIDI volume, the net  
effect of volume 0.0 should be silence, but it is not.


Fortunately, the workaround is very easy: 0.001.  (I intend to mention the  
workaround in CHANGES soon, in hopes of making thus not-release-blocking;  
that mention can be deleted if the bug can be fixed.)


--8<--
\version "2.13.60"  % 2.12.3 and 2.13.48 work
%{ midiM*Volume not respected if volume is 0.0
   Below, dynamics are not essential, but helpful for reading the MIDI file.
%}
\score {
  {
g'4\fff g'4\ppp
\set Staff.midiMinimumVolume = #0.0
\set Staff.midiMaximumVolume = #0.0 % workaround: #0.0001
g'4\fff g'4\ppp
  }
  \midi { }
}




___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1636 in lilypond: midiVolume 0.0 not respected

2011-04-26 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #1 on issue 1636 by jan.nieuwenhuizen: midiVolume 0.0 not respected
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1636

That was a thinko: midi volume used to be unitialized when == 0.  That was  
changed

to -1, but the note velocity was not set if volume was 0.

Thanks!

Fixed in 520b022 -- isn't there a way to link 520b022 to #1636, ie,
this issue; or can't we add such a thing to google code?


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1636 in lilypond: midiVolume 0.0 not respected

2011-04-26 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: fixed_2_15_0 backport

Comment #2 on issue 1636 by percival.music.ca: midiVolume 0.0 not respected
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1636

google code doesn't support git, and even if it did, the lilypond git  
repository is on a different server.  Ways of linking:

- leave some text in a comment (like you did, the "520b022" thing)
- leave some text in a git commit message (like you did, the "#1636" thing)
- dump a URL in either place.

That's all I can think of, I'm afraid.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1636 in lilypond: midiVolume 0.0 not respected

2011-04-26 Thread Colin Campbell

On 11-04-26 04:35 AM, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:

Updates:
Labels: fixed_2_15_0 backport

Comment #2 on issue 1636 by percival.music.ca: midiVolume 0.0 not 
respected

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1636

google code doesn't support git, and even if it did, the lilypond git 
repository is on a different server.  Ways of linking:

- leave some text in a comment (like you did, the "520b022" thing)
- leave some text in a git commit message (like you did, the "#1636" 
thing)

- dump a URL in either place.

That's all I can think of, I'm afraid.




I believe there are platforms which will allow code review as part of 
issue management; they all seem to live on single hosts, rather than in 
Google-managed clouds.  The great advantage to Google Code and Reitveld 
is free access and free infrastructure, at the cost of a completely 
manual connection between the two.


Colin

--
The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance
of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for those who
have too little.
-Franklin D. Roosevelt, 32nd US President (1882-1945)


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1636 in lilypond: midiVolume 0.0 not respected

2011-04-29 Thread lilypond


Comment #4 on issue 1636 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: midiVolume 0.0 not  
respected

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1636

backported


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 1636 in lilypond: midiVolume 0.0 not respected

2011-04-29 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Labels: -backport fixed_2_13_61

Comment #3 on issue 1636 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: midiVolume 0.0 not  
respected

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1636

backported


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond



Re: Issue 1636 in lilypond: midiVolume 0.0 not respected

2011-05-02 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Verified

Comment #5 on issue 1636 by brownian.box: midiVolume 0.0 not respected
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1636

Verified with 2.13.61, thank you!


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond