Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2011-08-26 Thread lilypond


Comment #19 on issue 665 by brownian.box: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

Jack Cooper offers $75:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-08/msg00552.html


There are some missed offers, I'll try to catch them too.

Actually I am not sure that everyone who offers some bounty, means exactly  
this issue.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2011-08-24 Thread lilypond


Comment #18 on issue 665 by fedel...@gmail.com: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

A recent discussion about this feature request:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-08/msg00435.html

I offer 50 euro


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2011-07-21 Thread lilypond


Comment #17 on issue 665 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: Request: MusicXML  
backend

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

Does anybody know whether the old bounty offers are still valid?
If yes, they would by now up sum up to $600 (counting everything mentioned  
in this issue report).

Add to it $50 from me.

I would really like to have a structural MusicXML export.

My 2cts to the discussion:
- I think we all are convinced of the superiority of Lilypond's engraving  
output.

  Nevertheless there are situations where one may need Lilypond scores
  to be used with other programms.
  See comment #6
  or this discussion on -user ("my" thread):
  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-06/msg00438.html
- To offer an export option is nice behaviour,
  not to offer it may be regarded as arrogant.
  So having it could improve Lilypond's acceptance.
- To have an at least semantically correct MusicXML file
  (instead of one with Lilyponds's layout information)
  would be plain better than not having it.
- Many of the possible uses of such a file wouldn't even be interested
  in the superior layout information

So this is one more vote for this feature.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2011-06-04 Thread lilypond


Comment #16 on issue 665 by kie...@alumni.rice.edu: Request: MusicXML  
backend

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

$100 here.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2011-06-02 Thread lilypond


Comment #15 on issue 665 by jan.nieuwenhuizen: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

You may want to look at input/regression/to-xml.ly and scm/to-xml.scm,
some old and preliminary work there.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2011-06-01 Thread lilypond


Comment #14 on issue 665 by carlo.stemberger: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

50$ from me.

http://nextsprocket.com/tasks/lilypond-music-xml-converter

Regards,
Carlo


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2011-01-01 Thread lilypond


Comment #13 on issue 665 by rogerdpack: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

$150 bounty from me.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2010-11-27 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Freitag 26 November 2010, um 22:51:59 schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com:
> Comment #12 on issue 665 by aleksandr.andreev: Request: MusicXML backend
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665
> 
> I'm working on a script that takes the raw Lilypond source and converts it
> to XML. If anyone is interested in collaborating, shoot me an email.

That approach will probably only work for relatively simple LilyPond files. 
Given the incredibly flexible syntax of lilypond files, I doubt that you can be 
able to get it right (that would basically involve duplicating the parsing and 
iterating stage of lilypond)...

The better approach would be IMO to create dedicated engravers for XML export.

Cheers,
Reinhold

-- 
--
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
email: reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
 * Edition Kainhofer Music Publishing, http://www.edition-kainhofer.com/
 * LilyPond music typesetting software, http://www.lilypond.org/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2010-11-26 Thread lilypond


Comment #12 on issue 665 by aleksandr.andreev: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

I'm working on a script that takes the raw Lilypond source and converts it  
to XML. If anyone is interested in collaborating, shoot me an email.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2010-02-18 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Owner: ---
Labels: -Priority-Postponed Priority-Low musicxml

Comment #11 on issue 665 by v.villenave: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

What about implementing the pure-music-stream export as a first step? Can't  
be (much)

worse than our current MIDI export, can it?

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2010-02-18 Thread lilypond


Comment #10 on issue 665 by reinhold.kainhofer: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

There have been some discussions on lilypond-devel and lilypond-user. Here  
is a

short excerpt from one of my mails, outlining how such a MusicXML backend
could/would be implemented:


The only problem is that the lilypond structure is not ideally
suited for full MusicXML 2.0 export:
All other graphical output formats (eps, ps, pdf, png, svg) simply export  
some
graphical objects with a fixed position on a page, so at that stage the  
musical
information is no longer available, so MusicXML export has to hook in  
earlier.


The pure musical structure can probably be easily extracted from the music
stream (e.g. by an engraver, listening to  all kinds of events), but at that
stage the page layout has not been done, so the great layout of lilypond
scores could not be exported directly.

On the other hand, the final graphical objects don't have any link to the  
music

object that caused them, so one would also have to add such a link to the
grobs.

The MusicXML export would then work in two stages in a lilypond run:
1) In an engraver create the xml tree for the pure musical content
2) at the same time, also listen to created graphical objects and add a
pointer to the corresponding xml node
3) After the layout is done, a MusicXML backend goes through the graphical
object and exports all positioning information (most of which is new in
MusicXML 2.0) to their linked xml nodes.


--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2010-02-18 Thread lilypond


Comment #9 on issue 665 by brownian.box: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

I'll happily make it 300, by the way.

Here in Kyiv, Ukraine is preferable option though, but others are possible,  
i hope.


--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2009-04-10 Thread codesite-noreply


Comment #8 on issue 665 by hopkin...@ldschurch.org: Request: MusicXML  
backend

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

My organization is looking at possibly using LilyPond, especially for its  
nice music typesetting and Unicode text
support. However, we would absolutely need it to not only import MusicXML,  
but to export it as well. The reason
for this is that we want to export the music and Unicode lyric text, etc.  
to a Web music product called Music
Player by musicRAIN (see http://musicrain.com/ and  
http://www.lds.org/churchmusic).


--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply


Comment #7 on issue 665 by v.villenave: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

Yet some unexpected news from Hu Haipeng: apparently, the professor who's  
in charge
of BrailleMuse has gone missing lately, and since it's an online tool the  
source

files cannot be fetched.
However, the FreeDots project [1], that is fully Free Software, now has  
support for

both ASCII and unicode output, and seems to be evolving fast.

(Of course, that doesn't solve our need of a MusicXML output for LilyPond  
though.)


[1] http://delysid.org/freedots.html

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2009-03-02 Thread codesite-noreply


Comment #6 on issue 665 by v.villenave: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

New comment from Hu Haipeng:

The best way for you all is, to make a MusicXml backend. This feature has  
the
following three advantages, two of which can't be approached by making a  
much
terrible and hopeless (complicated, because the ones who know braille don't  
know
programming, while the ones who program don't know braille!) braille  
backend:

  1. Musicxml can be accepted by most [free and non-free] notation programs.
  2. LilyPond just focuses on music typesetting, its midi output is really  
not ideal.
Every time I give my music to a composer, he/she will complain about the  
bad balance,
suspecting my orchestration technique. Using Sibelius or Finale's VST  
plugin can get
good sound output, including legato, staccato, glissando and smooth dynamic  
changes.
It is a very important thing for the composer to hear what he/she have  
written. The

more it's real, the better scoring result he/she can approach.
  3. It's a good thing to view our own compositions with braille. Ly2brl is  
extremely

difficult, and we have to begin from 0. Why don't we borrow other's fruits?

I use the BrailleMuse web-application, that is the most powerful  
musicxml2braille
program now. I have helped this Japanese project to improve their program  
for nearly
a year, and now, most of the musicxml files less than 20M can be processed.  
The only
limitation is no lyrics (english version, but the Japanese one can only  
output
Japanese texts), and the output is Ascii, which I like very much. You can  
adjust
several formattings to fit your paper, change many settings to fit your  
preference.


http://gotoh-lab.jks.ynu.ac.jp/braille_music_score_english/e-top-new.html#Service%20condition

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2008-11-22 Thread codesite-noreply


Comment #5 on issue 665 by v.villenave: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

New comment from Ralph Little:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-11/msg00293.html

"I have been approached by a programmer who is interested in helping me  
with my

efforts to produce braille output by going the XML approach.[...]

Currently, using Erik's interface method, structure could be exported in a  
fairly
straightforward manner, but positional information from Lilypond's layout  
engine
would be much harder to extract. For the purposes of what we require [for  
braille
conversion], the layout information is not really required. Therefore, we  
propose to
just extract the structure and leave the positional information for a later  
time. I

think the back-end implementation would be largely the same anyway.

We propose to link to the LGPL MusicXML library if there are no objections:
http://libmusicxml.sourceforge.net

This library is pretty mature and covers all the bases I think."


--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2008-11-20 Thread codesite-noreply

Issue 665: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

Comment #4 by v.villenave:
I'll happily make it 200, by the way.



--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2008-11-20 Thread codesite-noreply

Issue 665: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

Comment #3 by v.villenave:
Jonathan Kulp has offered a $100 bounty on -devel.


Issue attribute updates:
Labels: Bounty

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2008-08-24 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Hi,

Priorities for these types of changes (oodles of work) does not change
depending on user interest.  We can un-postpone it if someone comes
along to volunteer the necessary work.

On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 8:18 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Issue 665: Request: MusicXML backend
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665
>
> Comment #1 by v.villenave:
> Since we have more requests about it, I'm accepting it and slightly bumping
> the prio.
>
>
> Issue attribute updates:
>Status: Accepted
>Labels: -Priority-Postponed Priority-Medium
>
> --
> You received this message because you are listed in the owner
> or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
> You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
> http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
>
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>



-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2008-08-24 Thread codesite-noreply

Issue 665: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

Comment #1 by v.villenave:
Since we have more requests about it, I'm accepting it and slightly bumping  
the prio.



Issue attribute updates:
Status: Accepted
Labels: -Priority-Postponed Priority-Medium

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 665 in lilypond: Request: MusicXML backend

2008-08-21 Thread codesite-noreply

Issue 665: Request: MusicXML backend
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=665

New issue report by v.villenave:
This feature has been proposed by Reinhold Kainhofer on -devel:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-06/msg00129.html

More recently, an user shared his experience on -user:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-08/msg00838.html

Some highlights:

Han-Wen: "The last time we looked at this, I think the resolution was to
dump a music stream from LilyPond and postprocess that."

Reinhold: "unfortunately, the stream does only contain the musical content
in time-sorted order. MusicXML, however, also contains (or rather, can
contain) full information about page layout, breaks, object positioning and
similar settings [...] Since Lilypond produces a layout that is far
superior, I'd also like to include that information in
the xml files..."

Han-Wen: "you would probably have to use some sort of dual approach, where
you store the stream, label each event, and then you trace back the grobs
during output stage to their originating events. You can use the ordering
from the stream to output the XML elements in the correct order."



Issue attributes:
Status: New
Owner: v.villenave
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Postponed Usability

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond