Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-05-28 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Verified

Comment #14 on issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions  
for 2.14

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

I haven't heard any screams from packagers yet, so let's called this done.


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond


Comment #13 on issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions  
for 2.14

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

GUB has built most of the architectures (it's on linux-pcc right now); if  
these were
going to cause problems, it would have happened by now.  For the record GUB  
currently

has autoconf 2.63 and fontconfig 2.8.0.

I'll mark it verified once 2.13.21 has officially gone out, in a few days.

The python 2.4 thing is now issue 1079.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond


Comment #12 on issue 963 by v.villenave: check dependency versions for 2.14
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

This may not be the most appropriate place to discuss that, but do we still  
want to

ship Python 2.4 with the mingw LilyPond build?
(I personally don't care what version we do ship, but when I see the size  
of the
Windows Lily installer I often wish we could strip the bundled Python from  
all

unnecessary binaries/translations/etc. in order to make it lighter.)

Graham, I'll let you "Verify" this one if that's ok :)



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-05-08 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_21

Comment #11 on issue 963 by pnorcks: check dependency versions for 2.14
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

Okay, I've finished checking the libraries.  I only bumped two of the  
minimum versions:


Fontconfig: 2.4.0
Autoconf: 2.60

From what I can tell, our interface would still function with Pango 1.6.0  
and

Freetype 2.1.10, so there is no strict need to bump them to newer versions.

I'm done updating dependency versions for 2.14.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-05-06 Thread lilypond


Comment #10 on issue 963 by pnorcks: check dependency versions for 2.14
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

This is my plan:

I will be checking the APIs for

1) Pango
2) Fontconfig
3) Freetype

to make sure we are not using functions in these libraries that break the  
minimum
versions.  If there are any breakages, I will bump versions instead of  
trying to find
workarounds for older versions.  The minimum versions for these three are  
pretty old

anyway, much older than the versions in Debian stable.

Additionally, I will be (tentatively) bumping the Autoconf minimum version,  
since
there are a lot of workarounds in stepmake/aclocal.m4 for Autoconf 2.50  
that need to

be cleaned up -- I'll take care of that.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-04-19 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Status: Started

Comment #9 on issue 963 by pnorcks: check dependency versions for 2.14
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

For sure, we're not bumping Guile or Python, but I'll begin checking  
everything else

that has minimum version requirements.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions for 2.14

2010-04-14 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Summary: check dependency versions for 2.14

Comment #8 on issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions for  
2.14

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

I want somebody to tell me that we don't want to update any libraries [any  
more] for
2.14.  This includes guile, fontconfig, fontforge, font*, texinfo, pango,  
python, etc
etc etc.  We've decided that guile will not be updated for 2.14, but  
there's still a

lot of things to consider (main on the font side of things).

I've updated the summary.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-04-13 Thread lilypond


Comment #7 on issue 963 by Carl.D.Sorensen: check dependency versions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

It seems to me that with 2.16, rather than 2.14, now being the target for  
guile 2.0, this should no longer be
marked Critical (unless there are other libraries we want to check, as  
well).


--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-02-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #6 on issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

No it wouldn't -- then people wouldn't be able to take advantage of it  
without

spending hours rewriting their scores.

2.16 will use guile 2.0 (unless it's delayed beyond reasonable  
expectations).  Then

we can have a few months of stabilization with it before 3.0.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-02-22 Thread lilypond


Comment #5 on issue 963 by v.villenave: check dependency versions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

IWBN if we could make the guile 2.0 upgrade coincide with our next major  
version bump

(aka Lily 3.0), wouldn't it?

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-02-21 Thread lilypond


Comment #4 on issue 963 by hanwenn: check dependency versions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

I suspect it is will be painful to support both 1.8 and 2.0;

I think the smart plan is to wait for 2.0 to come out , and then try to  
upgrade lily
to guile 2.0 fully, throwing away backward compat: there are a number of  
improvements,
most notably the Boehm GC which will obviate all the hairy GC handling  
inside

LilyPond.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-02-21 Thread lilypond


Comment #3 on issue 963 by pnorcks: check dependency versions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

Sure, I'll look into it.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-02-20 Thread lilypond

Updates:
Owner: pnorcks

Comment #2 on issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

Let's not wait for guile 2.0.  Even if it comes out tomorrow, we should  
probably give

it a few months to find+resolve any major bugs.

Could you do a check for these items now?  I'd rather get any dependency  
update pains

out of the way now.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-01-09 Thread lilypond


Comment #1 on issue 963 by pnorcks: check dependency versions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

Guile 2.0 will be coming out relatively soon, and it's unclear to me  
whether we will
be able to support Guile 1.8 or earlier due to major incompatibilities with  
Guile 1.8.


We will also want to enable auto-compilation of LilyPond's Scheme code, and  
this

feature doesn't exist in Guile 1.8, only in Guile 1.9.something or later.

I think all of the other dependency versions should be okay, but I haven't  
done a

thorough check yet.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Issue 963 in lilypond: check dependency versions

2010-01-09 Thread lilypond

Status: Accepted
Owner: 
Labels: Type-Build Priority-Critical

New issue 963 by percival.music.ca: check dependency versions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=963

Before 2.14, but fairly close to the release, we should check the versions
of libraries and stuff we use.  I'm thinking in particular of guile;
there's supposed to be some much-faster version or something.

We don't want to bump version requirements during 2.14.x, so if we're going
to do it within the next 6 months, it should happen within the next 2-3  
months.



Marked as Critical because it needs to happen before 2.14, but other than
that this isn't time-sensitive.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond