Re: Issue labels
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:54 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: I think Ugly means bad decisions, usually based on insufficient detail in the algorithms. Defect means that things go different than intended by the programmer. There is some overlap, but if staves are not getting removed that should be or vice versa, that's Defect in my opinion. Thanks for your quick and clear response, David. Ralph ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Issue labels
Hi, everyone - I'm a little confused. I've been entering issues as Ugly which don't really seem to fit. Should they be Defects? What would constitute a defect in the core program? For example, would the ambitus problems recently reported be better classified as defects? I appreciate your time and attention, Ralph ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue labels
Ralph Palmer ralphbugl...@gmail.com writes: Hi, everyone - I'm a little confused. I've been entering issues as Ugly which don't really seem to fit. Should they be Defects? What would constitute a defect in the core program? For example, would the ambitus problems recently reported be better classified as defects? Yes. I appreciate your time and attention, I think Ugly means bad decisions, usually based on insufficient detail in the algorithms. Defect means that things go different than intended by the programmer. There is some overlap, but if staves are not getting removed that should be or vice versa, that's Defect in my opinion. -- David Kastrup ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
