Re: NR 3.5.7: the articulate script: why not suggesting two \score blocks?

2012-10-03 Thread Marek Klein
Hello
2012/9/30 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com

 In NR 3.5.7, The Articulate script:

 After altering your input file this way, the visual output is heavily
 altered, but the standard \midi block will produce a better MIDI file.

 This alteration refers to the use of \unfoldRepeats, I suppose.

 Why don't we suggest to use two score blocks, one for \layout and one for
 \midi?

 So the visual output won't be altered.

 There's any reason why you didn't make this suggestion?


Thank you for the suggestion, it has been added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2877

Marek
bug squad member
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: NR 3.5.7: the articulate script: why not suggesting two \score blocks?

2012-10-03 Thread Martin Tarenskeen



On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Marek Klein wrote:


Hello
2012/9/30 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com


In NR 3.5.7, The Articulate script:

After altering your input file this way, the visual output is heavily
altered, but the standard \midi block will produce a better MIDI file.

This alteration refers to the use of \unfoldRepeats, I suppose.


In fact much more things are altered than just \unfoldRepeats
Just give it a try on a score with trills and different articulations like 
staccato and legato for example.



Why don't we suggest to use two score blocks, one for \layout and one for
\midi?

So the visual output won't be altered.


Good point. In fact that's what I always do already when using 
articulate.ly


--

MT

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


NR 3.5.7: the articulate script: why not suggesting two \score blocks?

2012-09-30 Thread Federico Bruni

In NR 3.5.7, The Articulate script:

After altering your input file this way, the visual output is heavily 
altered, but the standard \midi block will produce a better MIDI file.


This alteration refers to the use of \unfoldRepeats, I suppose.

Why don't we suggest to use two score blocks, one for \layout and one 
for \midi?


So the visual output won't be altered.

There's any reason why you didn't make this suggestion?
--
Federico

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond


Re: NR 3.5.7: the articulate script: why not suggesting two \score blocks?

2012-09-30 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/9/30 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
 In NR 3.5.7, The Articulate script:

 After altering your input file this way, the visual output is heavily
 altered, but the standard \midi block will produce a better MIDI file.

 This alteration refers to the use of \unfoldRepeats, I suppose.

Not only because of \unfoldRepeats. To achieve a non-legato from plain
notes, silences are inserted in every note.


 Why don't we suggest to use two score blocks, one for \layout and one for
 \midi?

 So the visual output won't be altered.

 There's any reason why you didn't make this suggestion?

Because I did a skeletonic documentation and did not elaborate or
improve it since then.

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond