Re: Ugly collision between broken Slur and PhrasingSlur

2011-08-03 Thread Urs Liska 

Am 03.08.2011 06:07, schrieb Colin Campbell:

On 11-08-02 10:05 AM, Urs Liska wrote:

Hi,

following the late discussions on bug- and -user, I stumbled over an 
ugly collision between a phrasingSlur and a Slur at the beginning of 
a second staff. Actually the phrasing slur tries to escape the slur 
but does this in a spectacular way - while the collision is still there:


\version "2.15.5"

\relative a'
{
  \key d \major
  \time 2/2
  \clef treble

   a2.\(( d8[ cis] | \break
   b2 cis4) b\) | \break

   a2.\((\p d8[ cis] | \break
   b2.) cis4\) | \break

}

The breaks are needed because in the real example there are many 
notes in the piano ...
In lines 1 and 2 it is only an ugly collision (probably an instance 
of issue #427?)
but lines 3 and 4 (when the slur ends on the first note after the 
line break) are really crazy and mess up the page layout of my music 
completely.


Is this just issue #427 or should one add a new issue?
If not, what about the fact that #427 is abandonde?
I think this is quite an embarassing output.

Best
Ur




It certainly does look like issue 427, Urs, although the slur in bar 4 
is rather remarkable!  The issue is still open, but a proposed patch 
was marked abandoned in February, as the developer was no longer 
working on the issue. Issue 163 is also quite similar, and Mike 
Solomon has a patch in progress which looks like it should fix the 
problem.



Thanks for the info, Colin.
I think this is quite right, and also quite promising. Wouldn't be the 
first time I stumble over an issue which is about to be solved. 
(Although admittely I also stumble over issues that have lived as 
"postponed" for a long time ...)


Best
Urs

Cheers,
Colin Campbell
Bug Squad





___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Ugly collision between broken Slur and PhrasingSlur

2011-08-02 Thread Colin Campbell 

On 11-08-02 10:05 AM, Urs Liska wrote:

Hi,

following the late discussions on bug- and -user, I stumbled over an 
ugly collision between a phrasingSlur and a Slur at the beginning of a 
second staff. Actually the phrasing slur tries to escape the slur but 
does this in a spectacular way - while the collision is still there:


\version "2.15.5"

\relative a'
{
  \key d \major
  \time 2/2
  \clef treble

   a2.\(( d8[ cis] | \break
   b2 cis4) b\) | \break

   a2.\((\p d8[ cis] | \break
   b2.) cis4\) | \break

}

The breaks are needed because in the real example there are many notes 
in the piano ...
In lines 1 and 2 it is only an ugly collision (probably an instance of 
issue #427?)
but lines 3 and 4 (when the slur ends on the first note after the line 
break) are really crazy and mess up the page layout of my music 
completely.


Is this just issue #427 or should one add a new issue?
If not, what about the fact that #427 is abandonde?
I think this is quite an embarassing output.

Best
Ur




It certainly does look like issue 427, Urs, although the slur in bar 4 
is rather remarkable!  The issue is still open, but a proposed patch was 
marked abandoned in February, as the developer was no longer working on 
the issue. Issue 163 is also quite similar, and Mike Solomon has a patch 
in progress which looks like it should fix the problem.


Cheers,
Colin Campbell
Bug Squad


--
The human race has one really effective weapon, and that is laughter.
-- Mark Twain

 



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond