Re: line-width 2.7.38
Sounds good to me. Trent - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Trent Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 5:14 AM Subject: Re: line-width 2.7.38 > > On 13-Mar-06, at 11:59 PM, Trent Johnston wrote: > > > I haven't read anything in the manaul that setting the paper size > > would stop > > line-width from working. Either this needs to be documented or it is a > > bug > > that setting one should stop the other from working. > > I agree with Erik that this is the expected behavior, but I added a > note to the docs anyway to make this explicit. > - Graham > > ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: line-width 2.7.38
On 13-Mar-06, at 11:59 PM, Trent Johnston wrote: I haven't read anything in the manaul that setting the paper size would stop line-width from working. Either this needs to be documented or it is a bug that setting one should stop the other from working. I agree with Erik that this is the expected behavior, but I added a note to the docs anyway to make this explicit. - Graham ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: line-width 2.7.38
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 08.59, Trent Johnston wrote: > Hi Erik, > > I think I worked out the problem I had > > #(set-paper-size "a4") > > also in the paper block. Once I removed it line-width worked perfectly > again. > > I haven't read anything in the manaul that setting the paper size would > stop line-width from working. Either this needs to be documented or it is a > bug that setting one should stop the other from working. Well, I guess this is because set-paper-size sets the line-width, which isn't a bug. -- Erik ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: line-width 2.7.38
Hi Erik, I think I worked out the problem I had #(set-paper-size "a4") also in the paper block. Once I removed it line-width worked perfectly again. I haven't read anything in the manaul that setting the paper size would stop line-width from working. Either this needs to be documented or it is a bug that setting one should stop the other from working. Trent - Original Message - From: "Erik Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: "Trent Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 1:27 AM Subject: Re: line-width 2.7.38 | On Monday 13 March 2006 11.04, Trent Johnston wrote: | > Hi again, | > | > I've got an update on the line-width problem. | > | > I't works fine when I directly input it into a score | > | > \paper { line-width=18.5\cm} | > | > But when used in an separate file using: | > | > \paper { \include "paper.ly" } | > | > Line-width is ignored but everything else is used and processed. | | Hi, | | I can't reproduce. The following is handled correctly: | | %% foo.ly | \paper { \include "bar.ly" } | { c1 } | | %% bar.ly | line-width = 6\cm | | | -- | Erik | ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: line-width 2.7.38
On Monday 13 March 2006 11.04, Trent Johnston wrote: > Hi again, > > I've got an update on the line-width problem. > > I't works fine when I directly input it into a score > > \paper { line-width=18.5\cm} > > But when used in an separate file using: > > \paper { \include "paper.ly" } > > Line-width is ignored but everything else is used and processed. Hi, I can't reproduce. The following is handled correctly: %% foo.ly \paper { \include "bar.ly" } { c1 } %% bar.ly line-width = 6\cm -- Erik ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond