On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:00 AM, <bug-lilypond-requ...@gnu.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Martin Tarenskeen > <m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl> wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Apr 2017, Christopher Heckman wrote: > >>> I like the idea and really appreciate your efforts, but I tried your patch >>> and it doesn't seem to work (yet), at least not on my system. I can't > >> Hm. My Python might be a bit rusty, but the syntax doesn't differ from >> the original code. However, you need to answer the "usual questions": > > Never mind. > I found the "error". In your original message you wrote "replace the dump > function with: (...your code... # end modified code)", so that's what I > literally did. > > But the code you posted did not replace the *complete* function down to > and including "return s". After your "# end modified code" there were > still 3 lines of code in the original dump function that had to stay > unchanged, not replaced. > > global reference_note > reference_note_duration = self > return s
Okay, that would do it. Sorry about the mixup. > Now it works. Where can I find your latest Git patch? That's a good question. I submitted it, I think ... This is the first time I've used git. > I did some tests, and found occasions where the original version gives > better results. I need to do more testing though. That *is* strange. At worst, the output shouldn't change. Once again, an example would be nice. --- Christopher Heckman _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond