Re: doc addition: IR v2.20.0, 3.1.9 Arpeggio, positions

2020-08-27 Thread James 

Hello Owain

On 26/08/2020 02:47, Owain Evans wrote:

Hi Bug-Lily,

In IR v2.20.0
3.1.9 Arpeggio, positions (pair of numbers),
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/internals/arpeggio

Says (left . right). Should read (bottom . top).
Please change to read:

Pair of staff coordinates (bottom . top), where both bottom and top are in 
staff-space units of the current staff. For slurs, this value is (left-vertical 
. right-vertical) and selects which slur candidate to use; if extreme positions 
are requested, the closest one is taken.

"The for slurs part" I've change so it makes sense, but unsure if
"(left-vertical . right-vertical)" too verbose or correct naming convention.

An example of it so it's clear it's (bottom . top) not (left . right)
\version "2.20.0"
{
   \override Staff.Arpeggio.positions = #'(-4 . 4)
   \arpeggio
}
Please could it be corrected.
Many thanks,

Owain Evans


Thanks for taking the time.

https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6029

James


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

doc addition: IR v2.20.0, 3.1.9 Arpeggio, positions

2020-08-25 Thread Owain Evans 
Hi Bug-Lily,

In IR v2.20.0
3.1.9 Arpeggio, positions (pair of numbers),
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/internals/arpeggio

Says (left . right). Should read (bottom . top).
Please change to read:

Pair of staff coordinates (bottom . top), where both bottom and top are in 
staff-space units of the current staff. For slurs, this value is (left-vertical 
. right-vertical) and selects which slur candidate to use; if extreme positions 
are requested, the closest one is taken.

"The for slurs part" I've change so it makes sense, but unsure if 
"(left-vertical . right-vertical)" too verbose or correct naming convention.

An example of it so it's clear it's (bottom . top) not (left . right)
\version "2.20.0"
{
  \override Staff.Arpeggio.positions = #'(-4 . 4)
  \arpeggio
}
Please could it be corrected.
Many thanks,

Owain Evans
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond