On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Dan Eble <nine.fierce.ball...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> >I'm not top posting.
> % I'm not sure if this is a defect in functionality, nomenclature,
> % documentation, or all three.
> %
> % It is not clear what is "implicit" about
> % "implicitTimeSignatureVisibility", since it has the same effect
> % whether the time signature is omitted or specified.
> %
> % The notation reference says that "implicitTimeSignatureVisibility"
> % is "break visibility for the default time signature", yet it has the
> % same effect whether the time signature is the default 4/4 or
> % something else.
> %
> % What it does appear to do is control the visibility of the first
> % time signature.
> \version "2.19.14"
>
> \score {
>   \relative { c'1^"Default, Implicit (Visible)" }
> }
>
> \score {
>   \relative {
>     \set Score.implicitTimeSignatureVisibility = #all-invisible
>     c'1^"Default, Implicit"
>   }
> }
>
> \score {
>   \relative {
>     \set Score.implicitTimeSignatureVisibility = #all-invisible
>     \time 4/4 c'1^"Default, Explicit"
>   }
> }
>
> \score {
>   \relative {
>     \set Score.implicitTimeSignatureVisibility = #all-invisible
>     \time 3/4 c'2.^"Non-default, Explicit"
>   }
> }
>

Greetings - this has been submitted as Issue 4151 :
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4151

Ralph
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to