Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Updates: Labels: -Patch-review Patch-new Comment #14 on issue 2216 by gra...@percival-music.ca: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216 Sorry, I'm changing this to patch-new so that Marek can practice on it. The patch itself is fine. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Updates: Labels: Patch-review Comment #15 on issue 2216 by d...@gnu.org: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216#c15 Patchy the autobot says: LGTM. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Updates:
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #12 on issue 2216 by pkx1...@gmail.com: AU: Document all options
for lilypond -dhelp
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216#c12
Doc: AU - document -dhelp CLI options
Issue 2216
Add new @node for the -d[Scheme_val] option.
Renamed old node so that it is distinguishable from the
cli using sceheme variables.
Moved all the original -d[symbol] information over and added
some @ref{} for different options.
Other minor syntax changes and spacing edits on surrounding text.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5843060
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Ian On 19 March 2012 13:45, Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk wrote: Hi Phil, On 19/03/12 11:31, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote: Comment #4 on issue 2216 by pkx1...@gmail.com: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216 I noticed Graham has some commments. I'd also like to make sure that my terminology is correct. I.e. the command -d[symbol]=[value] or --define-default=[symbol]=[value] is this a Scheme 'symbol' or something else? I'd just like it to use the correct terminology. 'symbol' == a command-line option name which is handled at scheme level rather from within the C++ code. Quite often they are boolean flags so they default to using #t or #f (because they are handled using scheme). In other cases, like loglevel, they can use a whole set of string values. Maybe this? -d[option-name]=[value] or --define-default=[option-name]=[value] Thanks, that helps a lot. -- -- James ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Updates:
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #8 on issue 2216 by pkx1...@gmail.com: AU: Document all options for
lilypond -dhelp
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216#c8
Doc: AU - document -dhelp CLI options
Issue 2216
Add new @node for the -d[Scheme_val] option.
Renamed old node so that it is distinguishable from the
cli using sceheme variables.
Moved all the original -d[symbol] information over and added
some @ref{} for different options.
Other minor syntax changes and spacing edits on surrounding text.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5843060
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Updates: Labels: Patch-needs_work Comment #9 on issue 2216 by d...@gnu.org: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216#c9 Patchy the autobot says: Patch does not apply to master. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Comment #10 on issue 2216 by pkx1...@gmail.com: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216 David, I have just applied my patch to current master with no issue --snip-- First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Fast-forwarded master to 7a0c49b741de8aa998e17c310d7a4703d7b1712c. james@DellVM:~/lilypond-git$ git am ../Dropbox/LPPatches/0002-Doc-AU-document-dhelp-CLI-options.patch Applying: Doc: AU - document -dhelp CLI options james@DellVM:~/lilypond-git$ --snip-- git-cl always complains if you haven't done a 'pull' before uploading a patch (dirty tree or something). So have I missed something or is the problem on your master? James ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Comment #11 on issue 2216 by d...@gnu.org: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216 It is obvious that your patch on Dropbox does not correspond to the latest patch uploaded to the Rietveld issue (I checked using the same master commit you just specified and downloaded the latest patch from Rietveld manually): dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ git checkout 7a0c49b741de8aa998e17c310d7a4703d7b1712c Note: checking out '7a0c49b741de8aa998e17c310d7a4703d7b1712c'. You are in 'detached HEAD' state. You can look around, make experimental changes and commit them, and you can discard any commits you make in this state without impacting any branches by performing another checkout. If you want to create a new branch to retain commits you create, you may do so (now or later) by using -b with the checkout command again. Example: git checkout -b new_branch_name HEAD is now at 7a0c49b... Doc: CG Typo of Typo dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ git apply /tmp/issue5843060_2002.diff error: patch failed: Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi:330 error: Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi: patch does not apply ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Updates: Labels: Patch-review Comment #3 on issue 2216 by d...@gnu.org: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216#c3 Patchy the autobot says: LGTM. But test-patches does not do a doc build. Given sufficient horsepower, it might be prudent to do a make doc before pushing to staging. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Comment #4 on issue 2216 by pkx1...@gmail.com: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216 I noticed Graham has some commments. I'd also like to make sure that my terminology is correct. I.e. the command -d[symbol]=[value] or --define-default=[symbol]=[value] is this a Scheme 'symbol' or something else? I'd just like it to use the correct terminology. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Comment #5 on issue 2216 by elu...@gmail.com: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216 are you sure symbol is correct? imo it should be variable or var: this variable is assigned a value. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Comment #6 on issue 2216 by pkx1...@gmail.com: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216 No I am not sure it is correct, however 'variable' isn't that helpful either. Hence my request from the devs to point me in the right direction if they can. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Comment #7 on issue 2216 by d...@gnu.org: AU: Document all options for
lilypond -dhelp
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216
Well, that's what happens if you say (set! some-symbol value): the variable
addressed by the interned symbol some-symbol is assigned a value.
The respective code in main.cc is:
case 'd':
{
string arg (option_parser-optional_argument_str0_);
ssize eq = arg.find ('=');
string key = arg;
string val = #t;
if (eq != NPOS)
{
key = arg.substr (0, eq);
val = arg.substr (eq + 1, arg.length () - 1);
}
init_scheme_variables_global
+= (cons \' + key + ' + val + )\n;
}
This is somewhat disconcerting since init_scheme_variables_global is
augmented with text, meaning that it is reasonably easy to sneak in
arbitrary code here by supplying a key containing spaces. To me, it would
seem reasonably to have the whole of init_scheme_variables_global not
evaluated but just read, in which case the expression would rather be
+= ( + key + . + val + )\n;
of course, if unmatched parens or quotes are contained in key and val, one
can again meddle with what is happening here. Instead of building strings
here, directly building a Scheme expression would likely make more sense.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Hi Phil, On 19/03/12 11:31, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote: Comment #4 on issue 2216 by pkx1...@gmail.com: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216 I noticed Graham has some commments. I'd also like to make sure that my terminology is correct. I.e. the command -d[symbol]=[value] or --define-default=[symbol]=[value] is this a Scheme 'symbol' or something else? I'd just like it to use the correct terminology. 'symbol' == a command-line option name which is handled at scheme level rather from within the C++ code. Quite often they are boolean flags so they default to using #t or #f (because they are handled using scheme). In other cases, like loglevel, they can use a whole set of string values. Maybe this? -d[option-name]=[value] or --define-default=[option-name]=[value] Cheers, Ian ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Updates: Summary: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp Labels: -Needs-policy Comment #1 on issue 2216 by pkx1...@gmail.com: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216 (No comment was entered for this change.) ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Issue 2216 in lilypond: AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: pkx1...@gmail.com
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #2 on issue 2216 by pkx1...@gmail.com: AU: Document all options for
lilypond -dhelp
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216
Doc: AU - document -dhelp CLI options
Issue 2216
Add new @node for the -d[Scheme_val] option.
Renamed old node so that it is distinguishable from the
cli using sceheme variables.
Moved all the original -d[symbol] information over and added
some @ref{} for different options.
Other minor syntax changes and spacing edits on surrounding text.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5843060
Passes make and make doc
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: lilypond -dhelp
Apparently, if I use the instructions on making a link to the lilypond binary, it works. If I just call lilypond -dhelp from within the folder Lilypond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/ it doesn't work. On Sep 22, 2008, at 5:07 PM, James E. Bailey wrote: Yeah, still same problem. I even moved the program to the Applications directory. vanessa_imac:/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin jamesebailey$ ./lilypond -dhelp GNU LilyPond 2.11.59 warning: not relocating, no 2.11.59/ or current/ found under / Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/share/lilypond/ ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: ERROR: Unable to find file lily.scm in load path And to be fair, it makes sense, the share/lilypond/current isn't in bin/, it's in Resources/. I guess I'll try making a link and see if that solves the problem. …sigh… On Tuesday, September 23, 2008, at 01:58AM, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting. Works here on 10.4.11 intel. tsubasa:~ gperciva$ lilypond -dhelp GNU LilyPond 2.11.59 Options supported by ly:set-option anti-alias-factor (1) ... Could you try deleting the LilyPond.app and installing it again? Cheers, - Graham On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:49:38 +0200 James E. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On osx 10.4, using the 2.11.59-1 intel binary, I get the following: vanessa_imac:~/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin jamesebailey$ ./lilypond -dhelp GNU LilyPond 2.11.59 warning: not relocating, no 2.11.59/ or current/ found under /Users/jamesebailey/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/ bin/share/lilypond/ ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: ERROR: Unable to find file lily.scm in load path And then I don't get the -dhelp options. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
lilypond -dhelp
On osx 10.4, using the 2.11.59-1 intel binary, I get the following: vanessa_imac:~/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin jamesebailey$ ./lilypond -dhelp GNU LilyPond 2.11.59 warning: not relocating, no 2.11.59/ or current/ found under /Users/jamesebailey/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/share/lilypond/ ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: ERROR: Unable to find file lily.scm in load path And then I don't get the -dhelp options. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: lilypond -dhelp
Interesting. Works here on 10.4.11 intel. tsubasa:~ gperciva$ lilypond -dhelp GNU LilyPond 2.11.59 Options supported by ly:set-option anti-alias-factor (1) ... Could you try deleting the LilyPond.app and installing it again? Cheers, - Graham On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:49:38 +0200 James E. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On osx 10.4, using the 2.11.59-1 intel binary, I get the following: vanessa_imac:~/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin jamesebailey$ ./lilypond -dhelp GNU LilyPond 2.11.59 warning: not relocating, no 2.11.59/ or current/ found under /Users/jamesebailey/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/share/lilypond/ ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: ERROR: Unable to find file lily.scm in load path And then I don't get the -dhelp options. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: lilypond -dhelp
Yeah, still same problem. I even moved the program to the Applications directory. vanessa_imac:/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin jamesebailey$ ./lilypond -dhelp GNU LilyPond 2.11.59 warning: not relocating, no 2.11.59/ or current/ found under /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/share/lilypond/ ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: ERROR: Unable to find file lily.scm in load path And to be fair, it makes sense, the share/lilypond/current isn't in bin/, it's in Resources/. I guess I'll try making a link and see if that solves the problem. …sigh… On Tuesday, September 23, 2008, at 01:58AM, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting. Works here on 10.4.11 intel. tsubasa:~ gperciva$ lilypond -dhelp GNU LilyPond 2.11.59 Options supported by ly:set-option anti-alias-factor (1) ... Could you try deleting the LilyPond.app and installing it again? Cheers, - Graham On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:49:38 +0200 James E. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On osx 10.4, using the 2.11.59-1 intel binary, I get the following: vanessa_imac:~/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin jamesebailey$ ./lilypond -dhelp GNU LilyPond 2.11.59 warning: not relocating, no 2.11.59/ or current/ found under /Users/jamesebailey/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/share/lilypond/ ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: ERROR: Unable to find file lily.scm in load path And then I don't get the -dhelp options. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
