Re: parallel-music - still not R5RS compliant
Hi, should I create the patch and send it? Bert original message follows We've had a conversation with Nicolas in May, summarizing: //(apply for-each (lambda (. seqs) does not work on my java-based R5RS parser Nicolas wrote: //You're right, I've been lazy, and scheme gets on my nerves sometimes. It should be (lambda* (#:rest seqs) ...), having (use-modules (ice-9 optargs)) before. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2006-05/msg00180.html Could you please apply this to music-functions-init.ly, if possible and also backport it to 2.8 Thanks, Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
parallel-music - still not R5RS compliant
We've had a conversation with Nicolas in May, summarizing: //(apply for-each (lambda (. seqs) does not work on my java-based R5RS parser Nicolas wrote: //You're right, I've been lazy, and scheme gets on my nerves sometimes. It should be (lambda* (#:rest seqs) ...), having (use-modules (ice-9 optargs)) before. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2006-05/msg00180.html Could you please apply this to music-functions-init.ly, if possible and also backport it to 2.8 Thanks, Bert ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
