Re: second+ voice cross-measure slur problem

2013-07-30 Thread Urs Liska 

Am 29.07.2013 08:21, schrieb Papanastasiou Spyridon:

I'm not top posting.

\version "2.16.2"
\new Staff {
   <<{\voiceOne a1}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1(}>>
   <<{\voiceOne a1}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1)}>>
   <<{\voiceOne a1(}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
   <<{\voiceOne a1)}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
}

the first slur is not connected



It is because you are using a polyphonic construct where the _first_ 
voice is considered a contigious voice while the second is instantiated 
only during that polyphonic section.

Maybe this post on lilypondblog.org can help you understand the issue?:
http://lilypondblog.org/2013/07/voice-contexts-in-temporary-polyphonic-sections/

HTH
Urs

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: second+ voice cross-measure slur problem

2013-07-29 Thread David Kastrup 
Papanastasiou Spyridon  writes:

>> I'm not top posting.
>
> \version "2.16.2"
> \new Staff {
>   <<{\voiceOne a1}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1(}>>
>   <<{\voiceOne a1}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1)}>>
>   <<{\voiceOne a1(}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
>   <<{\voiceOne a1)}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
> }
>
> the first slur is not connected

Starting and ending slur are in different voices (each started with a
separate \new Voice) so LilyPond does not consider them related.

-- 
David Kastrup


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: second+ voice cross-measure slur problem

2013-07-29 Thread Eluze 
Papanastasiou Spyridon wrote
> \version "2.16.2"
> \new Staff {
>   <<{\voiceOne a1}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1(}>>
>   <<{\voiceOne a1}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1)}>>
>   <<{\voiceOne a1(}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
>   <<{\voiceOne a1)}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
> }
> 
> the first slur is not connected

I don't see what you're trying to do - can you draw an outline or scan an
example!?

here is a small example how I would write a 2-voice staff:

\new Staff <<
  \new Voice {
\voiceOne
a1
a1
a1(
a1)
  }
  \new Voice {
\voiceTwo
c1(
c1)
    c1
    c1
  }
>>

Eluze



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/second-voice-cross-measure-slur-problem-tp148499p148501.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

second+ voice cross-measure slur problem

2013-07-28 Thread Papanastasiou Spyridon 
> I'm not top posting.

\version "2.16.2"
\new Staff {
  <<{\voiceOne a1}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1(}>>
  <<{\voiceOne a1}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1)}>>
  <<{\voiceOne a1(}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
  <<{\voiceOne a1)}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
}

the first slur is not connected


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond