Re: Contradicting license informations in make.texi

2006-03-28 Thread Eli Zaretskii
 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:14:49 +0200
 From: Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 1) Version b) lists the ``GNU General Public License'' as an Invariant
 Section, but does not actually include it.

It should mention the GFDL section (which _is_ included) instead.  I'm
guessing that when the manual was converted to GFDL, the stale
reference to GPL was left behind by mistake.

 2) Obviously, version a) and b) differ.  This may be a mistake, and
 you may just bring them in sync.  Otherwise, it is unclear how to
 interpret it.

I don't think this is a mistake: the printed version mentions cover
text because only that version actually has cover text.  But IANAL.

 3) GFDL version 1.1 is listed as license for the manual, but later
 included is the text for GFDL version 1.2.  You probably want to
 upgrade to version 1.2 consistently.

It says ``version 1.1 or later'', so there's no contradiction, at
least not legally.


___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make


Re: Problem with overriding def. SHELL-sh.exe on W2000

2006-03-28 Thread Eli Zaretskii
 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:05:41 +0200
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I'm using gnumake 3.78 (also tried 3.8) buided with VC on W2000.
 I've a problem with overriding default SHELL value from sh.exe to cmd.exe.

Yes, this is a known problem with Make on Windows.  I believe it has
been corrected in the current development code, which will be soon
released as Make 3.81.  You can try fetching the latest release
candidate from this URL:

  ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/make/make-3.81rc2.tar.gz

The file README.W32 includes instructions for building Make on
Windows.

If this problem doesn't go away with the new version of Make, please
report that.


___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make


Re: Contradicting license informations in make.texi

2006-03-28 Thread Paul D. Smith
Hi guys;

Thanks for your mention of, and interest in, the licensing issues with
the manual; I didn't notice them before.  I'm currently discussing the
situation on the GNU developers' mailing list and I'm getting the
official FSF line on these details and will change the wording in the
manual accordingly.


Cheers!

-- 
---
 Paul D. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Find some GNU make tips at:
 http://www.gnu.org  http://make.paulandlesley.org
 Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional. --Mad Scientist


___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make