Re: Single-suffix rules broken?
Hi, Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 12 August 2007 15:07, Ludovic Courtes wrote: Am I missing something The fact that you already sent this yesterday and it already got answered two hours before you resent it? Indeed. :-) Apologies for the noise. (Actually, it took me a while to understand my messages were being queued locally and all suddenly went out when I restarted Postfix...) Thanks, Ludovic. ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
Re: Single-suffix rules broken?
Hi, Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2007, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: I'm trying to use the following single-suffix rule: .SUFFIXES = .in ^ ^ I think, you mixed some syntax here. It's either SUFFIXES = .in for automake-processed files or (and this is AFAIK created from the above variable): .SUFFIXES: .SUFFIXES: .in Indeed, I was mixing both syntaxes. Thanks, Ludovic. ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
RE: Single-suffix rules broken?
On 12 August 2007 15:07, Ludovic Courtes wrote: Am I missing something The fact that you already sent this yesterday and it already got answered two hours before you resent it? Did the first answer fall in your spam bin maybe? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
RE: Single-suffix rules broken?
.SUFFIXES = .in Your makefile works for me (with make foo, given a foo.in) if I change that line to read: .SUFFIXES: .in -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ludovic Courtès Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 00:30 To: bug-make@gnu.org Subject: Single-suffix rules broken? Hi, I'm trying to use the following single-suffix rule: .SUFFIXES = .in .in: echo dot-in My understanding is that the rule should be triggered whenever there exists a file whose name is equal to the target name plus the `.in' suffix. For instance, make foo should trigger the rule when `foo.in' exists. However, that does not happen. Am I missing something or are single-suffix rules somehow broken? Thanks, Ludovic. ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
Re: Single-suffix rules broken?
Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2007, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: I'm trying to use the following single-suffix rule: .SUFFIXES = .in ^ ^ I think, you mixed some syntax here. It's either SUFFIXES = .in for automake-processed files or (and this is AFAIK created from the above variable): .SUFFIXES: .SUFFIXES: .in Regards, Daniel ___ Bug-make mailing list Bug-make@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
