Hi,
"Towle, Jonathan J." writes:
> We are running various versions of wget on our servers.
>
> On the server we need to use, we are running the very old version
> 1.9.1. We could upgrade either to 1.11.4, which we have on most of
> our servers, or the latest version.
>
> Our operate team is afraid to upgrade because existing production jobs
> are running 1.9.1. I assured them that it is almost certain that the
> newer versions are backwards-compatible, and nothing will stop
> working.
>
> Can someone confirm that all these versions are backwards-compatible?
we have always tried to be careful and keep backwards-compatibility, but
I know at least of a change in the latest releases that breaks it.
Newest releases need that you specify --trust-server-names to get the
same behaviour of older ones.
There might be other changes that break the compatibility, but I am not
aware of any.
> This transmission may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
> under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or
> use of the information contained herein (including any reliance
> thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and
> any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other
> defect that might affect any computer system into which it is
> received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to
> ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by
> JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as
> applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
> If you received this transmission in error, please immediately
> contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety,
> whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you.
you have sent the e-mail to a public mailing list.
--
Giuseppe
