DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8452] - perchild doesn't compile on Solaris 8
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8452. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8452 perchild doesn't compile on Solaris 8 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-24 05:52 --- Try this macro definition: -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D__EXTENSIONS__ I'm using Solaris8 IA + gcc-3.1, and apache-2.0.36 + perchild MPM has been compiled successfully. Also, it works fine. Additionally, on Solaris8, the alternate thread library is preferred than the standard thread lib. (Normally, outperforming and stable.) If /usr/xpg4/lib/libpthread.so exists: LDFLAGS = -lpthread -R/usr/xpg4/lib Otherwise: LDFLAGS = -lpthread -lthread -R/usr/lib/lwp Note that Solaris7 and earlier don't have the alternate thread lib, and Solaris9's standard thread lib is equivalent to Solaris8's alternate thread lib. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9038] - suexec is NOT being called by Apache 2.0.36
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9038.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9038
suexec is NOT being called by Apache 2.0.36
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-24 14:54 ---
How about to define mod_suexec/mod_userdir hook order as below:
(This will ensure suexec+userdir would work fine,
regardless of definition of SuexecUserGroup directives.)
--- httpd-2.0.36/modules/mappers/mod_userdir.c.org Mon Apr 29 16:45:43 2002
+++ httpd-2.0.36/modules/mappers/mod_userdir.c Thu May 23 22:32:50 2002
@@ -393,10 +393,13 @@
static void register_hooks(apr_pool_t *p)
{
static const char * const aszSucc[]={ mod_alias.c,NULL };
+#ifdef HAVE_UNIX_SUEXEC
+static const char * const suexSucc[]={ mod_suexec.c,NULL };
+#endif
ap_hook_translate_name(translate_userdir,NULL,aszSucc,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
#ifdef HAVE_UNIX_SUEXEC
-ap_hook_get_suexec_identity(get_suexec_id_doer,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
+
ap_hook_get_suexec_identity(get_suexec_id_doer,NULL,suexSucc,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
#endif
}
--- httpd-2.0.36/modules/generators/mod_suexec.c.orgThu Apr 25 16:18:39 2002
+++ httpd-2.0.36/modules/generators/mod_suexec.cFri May 24 22:15:49 2002
@@ -164,7 +164,9 @@
static void suexec_hooks(apr_pool_t *p)
{
-ap_hook_get_suexec_identity(get_suexec_id_doer,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
+static const char * const suexPre[]={ mod_userdir.c,NULL };
+
+
ap_hook_get_suexec_identity(get_suexec_id_doer,suexPre,NULL,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
ap_hook_post_config(suexec_post_config,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9038] - suexec is NOT being called by Apache 2.0.36
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9038. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9038 suexec is NOT being called by Apache 2.0.36 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-24 15:00 --- Specifying the order is a good idea ... but shouldnt be the other way around ? .. ie, if the site admin wants to be able to force a particular user directory to be a different UserGroup ID shouldnt they be able to ? All they need do is make sure user directories are within the suexec docroot .. which is easily done. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
