DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11386] - UserDir maps to root directory for nonexistant users
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11386. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11386 UserDir maps to root directory for nonexistant users --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-02 01:43 --- I have seen this problem reported once before on Solaris 8 using GCC 2.95.3. The developers have been unable to reproduce the problem, but the person who reported it said that it went away if they compiled with optimization turned off (-O0). In general, I believe that this problem can only be the result of a seriously misperforming compiler/library. Apache just uses a normal syscall to see if the user exists. But since this is a potentially serious security problem, I won't close the report until some of the developers get a chance to look at it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11386] - UserDir maps to root directory for nonexistant users
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11386. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11386 UserDir maps to root directory for nonexistant users --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-02 01:45 --- I guess I should provide a reference to the earlier report: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8oe=UTF- 8th=f4b181e0d06467dbseekm=abu2g1%24726%241%40nntp.itservices.ubc.caframe=off and also the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list for May, 2002 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11404] New: - ProxyPreserveHost directive does not preserve port
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11404. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11404 ProxyPreserveHost directive does not preserve port Summary: ProxyPreserveHost directive does not preserve port Product: Apache httpd-2.0 Version: 2.0.39 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: mod_proxy AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When using directive ProxyPreserveHost On the host (HTTP_HOST as well as SERVER_NAME) is preserved in the header, but not the port. The following directive ProxyPass /foo/ http://foo:8080/ des not preserve the SERVER_PORT in the header but replace it with 8080. Recommandation : - preserve the port or - create a ProxyPreservePort directive or - create a ProxyPreserveHeader directive that will preserve all. (Because at a time some may need also to preserve SERVER_PROTOCOL or other. In most cases, I think that when you want to preserve a field in the header, you want to preserve all fields. GM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11408] New: - send_file function does not work correctly on AIX 4.3.3.0 64 bits
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11408. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11408 send_file function does not work correctly on AIX 4.3.3.0 64 bits Summary: send_file function does not work correctly on AIX 4.3.3.0 64 bits Product: APR Version: HEAD Platform: Other OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: APR AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Apache 2.0.39 on AIX 4.3.3.0 64 bits. The send_file() give the errno '22' (invalid parameter) if the file is equal or bigger than 318 KB. On this system Apache has compiled using gcc 2.95.3 without binutils package. Linker, assembler and ar is coming from AIX distribution. To compile apache flags '-maix64' should be set for the compiler and the linker. To use ar and nm tools, you should specify '-X64' before other flags. The workaround is to specify that you don't want to use sendfile api. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7195] - mod_proxy removes Set-cookie headers
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7195. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7195 mod_proxy removes Set-cookie headers [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-02 15:27 --- Unresolved for 1.3.x - still requires a fix - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11431] New: - Server or DNS don't found said IE 6 or other Browser
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11431. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11431 Server or DNS don't found said IE 6 or other Browser Summary: Server or DNS don't found said IE 6 or other Browser Product: Apache httpd-1.3 Version: 1.3.23 Platform: PC URL: http://www.better-newsletter.com OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: Other mods AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's a ASP Software with PHP and MySql. Apache use the OpenSSL mod_ssl with our own Certificate. It runs fine but in many situations the Browser said Server or DNS not found. Without SSL this error is not reportet. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11375] - ici - a repeated error log entry
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11375. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11375 ici - a repeated error log entry [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-08-02 19:30 --- Your idea that these messages might be the standard error output of some cgi script was a good one, and indeed you were right. I am terribly sorry for having reported it as a bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
