DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15358] - Wrong filenames accepted by AddType
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15358. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15358 Wrong filenames accepted by AddType [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 00:03 --- Not a bug per documentation - closing. Thanks for using Apache HTTP Server! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15423] - mod_include stops processing if included script issues a redirect
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15423. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15423 mod_include stops processing if included script issues a redirect [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 00:09 --- Works for me with HEAD of httpd. Please try Apache 2.0.44. Thanks for using Apache HTTP Server! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15625] - mention mod_ssl in http://nagoya.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/*/*.README
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15625. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15625 mention mod_ssl in http://nagoya.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/*/*.README --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 01:16 --- Due to legal restrictions, we can not distribute mod_ssl as active in any of our binaries. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15652] - Apache is Very slow during peak load
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15652. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15652 Apache is Very slow during peak load [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 01:20 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15651 *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15651] - Apache is Very slow during peak
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15651. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15651 Apache is Very slow during peak --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 01:20 --- *** Bug 15652 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15655] - mod_perl 1.99_07 make test causes Apache2 threadpool mpm core dump
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15655. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15655 mod_perl 1.99_07 make test causes Apache2 threadpool mpm core dump --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 01:22 --- The threadpool MPM is experimental. Does it work with the worker MPM? Could you also please try with recent versions of APR, httpd, and mod_perl? Thanks for using Apache HTTP Server! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15664] - building failed---unexpected EL_UNINITIALIZED
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15664. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15664 building failed---unexpected EL_UNINITIALIZED [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 01:23 --- Please try a newer version of httpd. 2.0.44+ is known to compile fine with Forte. Thanks for using Apache HTTP Server. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15655] - mod_perl 1.99_07 make test causes Apache2 threadpool mpm core dump
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15655. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15655 mod_perl 1.99_07 make test causes Apache2 threadpool mpm core dump --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 02:09 --- I am sorry, but I don't have much time for this right now. I am in college full time. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7915] - strange substitutions in requests
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7915. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7915 strange substitutions in requests [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14276] - Index option IgnoreCase not ported from 1.3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14276. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14276 Index option IgnoreCase not ported from 1.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9971] - Windows command line build fails - script.awk missing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9971. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9971 Windows command line build fails - script.awk missing [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15943] - SSI should honor cache-related headers for virtually-included components
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15943. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15943 SSI should honor cache-related headers for virtually-included components [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 04:21 --- If you would like to do this, patches are welcome. But, this is not trivial to add nor easy. The biggest problem is dealing with changes to the cache-related headers once the headers are sent. In order to try to compute the most restrictive combination, you have to run/buffer the entire request first. That's not optimal from a performance standpoint and I believe might be worse than the current situation. I'm going to mark this as WONTFIX, but if you'd like to continue this discussion, the proper place is on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list not the issue database. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15957] - Cannot compile http-2.0.43 due to incompatible ssl
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15957. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15957 Cannot compile http-2.0.43 due to incompatible ssl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 04:34 --- This looks like a system problem or something with your install of OpenSSL. Perhaps OpenSSL was compiled against the Sun linker and your linker (GNU?) doesn't like it. All libraries may need to be linked by the same linker. Regardless, I don't have a problem with this setup. Marking as WORKSFORME. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15980] - apr_dbm_berkeleydb: db-open: Sleepycat API changed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15980. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15980 apr_dbm_berkeleydb: db-open: Sleepycat API changed [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 04:35 --- This has been fixed in the latest APR snapshots (which is included in 2.0.44). (Sleepycat changed the API in 4.1.x.) Thanks for using Apache HTTP Server! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17114] New: - Please add strip and install-strip targets to Makefile
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17114. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17114 Please add strip and install-strip targets to Makefile Summary: Please add strip and install-strip targets to Makefile Product: Apache httpd-2.0 Version: 2.0.44 Platform: All OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: Other Component: Build AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please add strip and install-strip targets to Makefile so that executables can be stripped of debugging symbols for installation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16046] - Memory leak
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16046. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16046 Memory leak [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 04:49 --- Should be fixed in modules/filters/mod_deflate.c r1.30 Thanks for using Apache HTTP Server! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16057] - module fails to init client_rmm and applies too many locks.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16057. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16057 module fails to init client_rmm and applies too many locks. --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 05:01 --- Either we should fix this (ouch, it is s broken), or just toss the shmem usage from mod_auth_digest. It's always disabled now. If someone wants to add it back, they would probably be better starting off from scratch than trying to sort out the current mess. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17115] New: - Support Webring dead link
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17115. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17115 Support Webring dead link Summary: Support Webring dead link Product: Apache httpd-2.0 Version: 2.0.32 Platform: Other URL: http://httpd.apache.org/ OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: Documentation AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nav.webring.org/navcgi?ring=apachesupport;list 404 Not Found The requested URL /navcgi was not found on this server. Apache/1.3.12 Server at 192.168.1.11 Port 80 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16813] - apachectl won't stop if httpd.conf has an error.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16813. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16813 apachectl won't stop if httpd.conf has an error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 07:08 --- Yup, this is a major annoyance. I've committed a fix to the tree for this problem, but it can't be backported to 2.0 because it changes a function signature. httpd-2.0: include/http_config.h: r1.99, server/config.c: r.1.164, server/main.c: r1.143 Thanks for using Apache HTTP Server! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15622] - serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622 serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Normal |Enhancement --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 07:10 --- I am happy to donate the ~$50 to get a certificate from e.g. http://www.comodogroup.com/products/certificate_services/index.html Where and how would I donate? (the support... link appears to be dead - see http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17115). I see http://www.apache.org/foundation/contributing.html#how-to-donate, but how would I ensure that it is used for the very purpose of this bug/enhancement? I could send the money to you personally through paypal or ask friend of mine at Irvine to give it to you in cash? Maybe you are right, it could be classified as an enhancement rather than a bug. Sure, pgp signing parties are a good thing, but it is still more than astonishing that Ben and Ralf (the mod_ssl key persons as mentioned in http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_ssl.html) never made it to one of those and even yourself only got Aaron to sign your key. AFAIK, out-of-band channels (e.g. calling Engelschall by phone in Munich) are another legitimate option to establish trust. I would even go one step further and suggest that in http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/KEYS, out-of-band approaches should be described just to verify the signers' fingerprints (with no expectation of subsequent cross-signing) for arbitrary apache downloading users. Sure, you might argue that you don't want to sit on the phone 7x24 repeating your fingerprint, but I contend that security awareness and knowledge among users unfortunately is such that the phone would only ring very rarely! Even setting up an answering machine somewhere that just reads down the list of PGP fingerprints is IMHO better than the status quo. Shall I open an new RFE for this? Hoping that all the above qualifies for a Reopen of this enhancement request. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16905] - [PATCH] Make Symbolic link not allowed log message more verbose
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16905. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16905 [PATCH] Make Symbolic link not allowed log message more verbose [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 07:10 --- Please post this patch to the developer's mailing list (dev@httpd.apache.org) rather than the issues database. Closing as INVALID. Thanks for using Apache HTTP Server! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16953] - Libtool syntax errors during shared module build
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16953. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16953 Libtool syntax errors during shared module build --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 08:12 --- Wow. This looks like a bug due to the machine that httpd-2.0.44 was rolled on. As far as I can tell, the stock version of libtool-1.4.3 does not have these lines. The only fix I can suggest is to install autoconf and libtool 1.4.3 yourself from the official GNU sources, and re-run buildconf. You may encounter a problem where apr-util and pcre are not configured correctly due to a shell limitation in Solaris (2.0.44 doesn't configure for me at all on my Solaris machine). If that happens, you need the latest snapshot of APR and rerun buildconf. We will make sure this is resolved for the next release. Thanks for using Apache HTTP Server! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16981] - apache fails to start or report an error when a path to a log file is incorrect
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16981. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16981 apache fails to start or report an error when a path to a log file is incorrect --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 08:16 --- For what it is worth, httpd-2.0+ reports an error in this case with the name of the bad log file. It might be possible to backport this from 2.0 to 1.3. If you'd like to do so, please discuss this on the development mailing list (dev@httpd.apache.org). Thanks for using Apache HTTP Server! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17107] - Should change sample printenv.pl in cgi-bin directory
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17107. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17107 Should change sample printenv.pl in cgi-bin directory --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 08:21 --- As a data point, the executable bit must be set on Unix-based platforms for printenv to execute. So, it is disabled by default on Unix already. (Get a nice 500 returned if people try to access it with a default install.) So, this seems like it is a Win32-only installation issue. (I agree that Win32 should disable it, too.) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12320] - ap_get_client_block memory hog
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12320. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12320 ap_get_client_block memory hog [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 08:28 --- You might want to try a recent version of httpd-2.0. 2.0.44 may work. There were some recent PRs that were closed today that address this codepath, so current snapshots may also work even better. In short, this has probably been fixed. Marking as FIXED. (Please reopen if it is still broken.) Thanks for using Apache HTTP Server! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17119] New: - serve page under https to facilitate out-of-band contact for pgp fingerprint verification
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17119. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17119 serve page under https to facilitate out-of-band contact for pgp fingerprint verification Summary: serve page under https to facilitate out-of-band contact for pgp fingerprint verification Product: Apache httpd-2.0 Version: 2.0.32 Platform: All URL: http://httpd.apache.org/contributors OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: Other Component: Documentation AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] as per http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622 Possibly, also add a Preferred way to reach me out of band for public key verification field per contributor. This especially applies to http://httpd.apache.org/contributors/#wrowe and http://httpd.apache.org/contributors/#striker, since they right now appear to sign the most important part of the downloads... Both apparently have unfortunately never been participants of the mentioned key signing parties (or is just being with Justin already a party ? ;)) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15622] - serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622 serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 09:37 --- Created an attachment (id=4897) patch for the KEYS file - more to follow in my next post - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16953] - Libtool syntax errors during shared module build
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16953. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16953 Libtool syntax errors during shared module build --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 09:43 --- Hmpf. Well, this seems to be my fault. I rolled on Gentoo and they seem to patch libtool in a way that it becomes non-portable. This one seems to be the culprit: http://cvs.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys- devel/libtool/files/1.4.3/libtool-1.4.2-portage.patch Anyway, my lesson learned, I've installed a vanilla libtool in my roll sandbox now. Sorry for the inconvenience. Next release we'll pay extra attention to this. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15622] - serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622 serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 10:01 --- Justin, Thanks your quick response and the additional insight. I am surprised that even in Apache.org Red Tape appears to have priority over security (I am sure the authorities don't complain if you accept my money now and do the paper-work/proper accounting end of year - maybe you want to set-up a private project FundAdmin in this bugzilla and record such a todo in there - see RFE http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193658). Anyway - the money is on the way to you. The requested patch - is above. For it to make sense, please see http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17119. I hope this would be more professional and feasible than your 411-3am nightmare scenario. Especially your institution Irvine could certainly agree that you answering your office phone a few times a week to read a fingerprint is in line with its (and your research grant's) mission. Similarly, I would expect this to be acceptable for William's firm Covalent too. I would be more than happy if it really turns out that Sanders is getting inundated with such phone calls (then the world is better than I think it is). If so, I am happy to sponsor him an extra phone line and an answering machine for a year! Rgds Ralf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15380] - httpd 2.0.43 long running processes using lots of CPU until forcibly terminated
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15380. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15380 httpd 2.0.43 long running processes using lots of CPU until forcibly terminated --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 10:41 --- EnableSendfile is not available in an httpd version before 2.0.44. HP uses version 2.0.43 and until now there is no newer release. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17122] New: - incorrect version of mod_jrun20.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17122 incorrect version of mod_jrun20.c Summary: incorrect version of mod_jrun20.c Product: Apache httpd-2.0 Version: 2.0.44 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: Other Modules AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The installation aborts due to an older version of mod_jrun20.c. Where can I find the required version (ca. Sept 2002?).Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16391] - compressing logs using rotatelogs
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16391. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16391 compressing logs using rotatelogs --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 11:05 --- As far as I know, that doesn't work if you use rotatelogs. I asked this question numerous times on different newsgroup, but haven't found an answer yet. If it was really that simple, it should be here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs- 2.0/logs.html . I know it was for 1.3 and if you where using regular logs, but for rotated logs using rotatelogs, I never saw something like that. BUT even if you could do it this way, it really SHOULD be an option for rotatelogs. Most recent Linux-logrotate programs have this option too. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16953] - Libtool syntax errors during shared module build
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16953. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16953 Libtool syntax errors during shared module build --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 12:59 --- Thanx for confirming this. I do have libtool 1.4.3 installed from the Sunfreeware site, so I'll go ahead and re-buildconf the apr stuff. Also noted the build failures in the pcre directory and traced that down to missing srcdir and builddir variable defines at the top of Makefile. They are need later on in the make to find the included rules.mk file. I installed by hand and got by this. Maybe your automake file here needs modification. Don't know how to do that yet. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17115] - Support Webring dead link
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17115. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17115 Support Webring dead link [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 13:47 --- hrm. Seems they have problems on their servers. As I answered the site worked ;-) Now I get the same error. (And no, I don't use IE, I'm running Phoenix ;-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17115] - Support Webring dead link
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17115. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17115 Support Webring dead link [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||REMIND Version|2.0.32 |HEAD --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 13:49 --- However, since it may be a temporary problem, I'll set this bug to REMIND. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17120] - Ignoring the FILES-Section in htaccess
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17120. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17120 Ignoring the FILES-Section in htaccess --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 14:48 --- if a dummy-file 123.html exists, this also works on the win32 apache. seems that there is another priority-order about 404 -- FILES-Section - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17120] - Ignoring the FILES-Section in htaccess
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17120. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17120 Ignoring the FILES-Section in htaccess [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 15:06 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8431 *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8431] - AddHandler/Action not-found when file does not exist
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8431. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8431 AddHandler/Action not-found when file does not exist [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 15:06 --- *** Bug 17120 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8431] - AddHandler/Action not-found when file does not exist
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8431. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8431 AddHandler/Action not-found when file does not exist [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 15:14 --- The behaviour was changed in 1.3.10 to handle virtual locations and not ported to 2.x. Anyway, I plan to add an argument virtual to the Action directive (in 2.1) that allows to skip the file-exists-check. Actually the patch already exists on my HDD but the time ... ;-) (reopening to change resolution) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8431] - AddHandler/Action not-found when file does not exist
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8431. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8431 AddHandler/Action not-found when file does not exist [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||LATER - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17133] New: - Page fault LIBHTTPD.DLL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17133. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17133 Page fault LIBHTTPD.DLL Summary: Page fault LIBHTTPD.DLL Product: Apache httpd-2.0 Version: 2.0.44 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 9x Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: Other Component: Core AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am getting a page fault in LIBHTTPD.DLL at 0177:6ff18a08. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17133] - Page fault LIBHTTPD.DLL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17133. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17133 Page fault LIBHTTPD.DLL [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 17:14 --- There's a patch available on http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi. Thanks for using Apache! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16288 *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16288] - Crash on console startup in ap_recent_ctime
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16288. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16288 Crash on console startup in ap_recent_ctime [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 17:14 --- *** Bug 17133 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17135] New: - require group doesn't like tabulation.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17135. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17135 require group doesn't like tabulation. Summary: require group doesn't like tabulation. Product: Apache httpd-2.0 Version: 2.0.44 Platform: HP URL: Interanet server OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: Other Component: mod_auth_ldap AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, I duno if it's realy related to mod_auth_ldap itself or not ... Well, I use LDAP authentification to protect some pages, and I try to use groups.So I use following line : require group cn=my_group ... The problem is : - if I use 1 (or more) space b/w group and cn=, it's working. - if I use a tab b/w group and cn=, the authentification always fails. I have made some checks w/ require user with both separator, so it seems it's only related to groups. Bye Laurent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15622] - serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622 serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 18:38 --- Aaron: 2) We should not imply to anyone that by downloading the KEYS file from an SSL server that they can suddenly trust the _contents_ of the KEYS file. Sure, they can better trust that the contents weren't altered during transmission ... It would be sad, if legitimate, but half-thought through legal questions result in a service degradation. Therefore I suggest to 1) Further add to the KEYS file: On apache's own site and some mirrors, you can download the KEYS under https. This reduces the exposure to some imaginable attacks, but this by no means implies that this file is authentic. For the proper way to determine whether you are satisfied with the KEYS' authenticity, please consult http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN335 2) If you deem the provided as is part in http://www.apache.org/LICENSE.txt to be insufficient protection for the foundation, perhaps it is time to add general TermsConditions (e.g. as http://www.apache.org/foundation/T_and_C.html) to the site every visitor/user has to abide by to remedy that. If you want an example for such TCs, I am happy to provide one, but I am sure you have the better lawyers than I do ... Perhaps I should open two separate RFEs for 1) and 2)? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17119] - serve page under https to facilitate out-of-band contact for pgp fingerprint verification
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17119. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17119 serve page under https to facilitate out-of-band contact for pgp fingerprint verification --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 18:55 --- Almost all of the people listed in the KEYS file have established trust relationships amongst each other. Therefore, you probably only need to find one person from the KEYS file to trust, then the whole 'web of trust' thing takes over. Preferably, you can find a person in your region to contact face-to-face or via a cheap phone call. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17119] - serve page under https to facilitate out-of-band contact for pgp fingerprint verification
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17119. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17119 serve page under https to facilitate out-of-band contact for pgp fingerprint verification --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 19:02 --- 1) If they have - why doesn't the KEYS file reflect that? Are its keys out of date (or are you claiming that I am using a buggy version of PGP ? It is freeware 7.0.3) 2) Most addresses/keys in KEYS do not define the geography the key owner lives in - therefore, I do suggest that they give some hints how to do that in contributors ... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15622] - serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622 serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 19:05 --- In reality, I would suggest that the best way is to send email to the person setting up an OOB conversation. We could make it a policy to reply to that message signed with the respective key. That way you are sure that the person who has the private key is responding to you with correct OOB details. Chicken-and-egg on the trust, but I'd be loathe to publish my phone number on the website. While my office number is probably public knowledge, I never answer it anyway (it's a party line shared with others). But, I'd be willing to give my cell phone number if someone asked politely. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15622] - serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622 serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 19:42 --- http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/KEYS I did a bunch of wordsmithing on the file to attempt to illustrate what we've discussed here. Thanks! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17119] - serve page under https to facilitate out-of-band contact for pgp fingerprint verification
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17119. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17119 serve page under https to facilitate out-of-band contact for pgp fingerprint verification --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 20:46 --- Look at the statistics as Justin claims that most of the people in this file have attempted to sign each others' keys: The total is 40 keys representing 32 unique individuals. Aaron: 6 others have signed his key Bjoern: 0 out 31 possible Ben: 0 out of these 31 (with 3 unknown others) Bill: 0 Brad: 0 Chuck: 0 Cliff: 1 Daniel: 0 Dean: 0 Dirk: 0 Doug: 0 Graham: 5 Greg A: 0 Greg S: 0 Ian: 0 Jim: 0 Justin: 1 Lars: 7 Marc: 0 Mark: 0 Martin: 0 Paul R: 0 Paul S: 0 Ralf: 0 Randy: 0 rbb: 0 Robert: 0 Ken: 2 Roy: 2 sameer: 0 Sander: 1 William: 0 I guess the numbers speak for themselves, but let me try some math here: There are 25 mutual signatures (probably some unique pairs less if a-b is assumed to equal b-a). If I remember right, there are factorial 32 possible signature pairs, i.e. 2.6*10^35 ... === the text should probably say a few of the people have obtained a few signatures from others... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15622] - serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15622 serve KEYS by means of https with a certificate issued by a CA that is built-in with the most popular browsers/mail clients --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 20:51 --- Thanks, this looks like progress to me - how about changing this to resolve-fixed or even better reopen. Just because in other places, statistics have been run against my bug success rate and I would hope you didn't think of this as a pure waste everybody's time... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10453] - Backward-compatible GET requests broken in 1.3.26
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10453. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10453 Backward-compatible GET requests broken in 1.3.26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10840] - [Mon Jul 15 13:51:59 2002] [warn] (22)Invalid argument: setsockopt: (TCP_NODELAY)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10840. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10840 [Mon Jul 15 13:51:59 2002] [warn] (22)Invalid argument: setsockopt: (TCP_NODELAY) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7889] - pcre.c:2534: `pcre_default_tables' undeclared
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7889. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7889 pcre.c:2534: `pcre_default_tables' undeclared [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7956] - redefinition of ap_hack_apr_xml_insert
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7956. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7956 redefinition of ap_hack_apr_xml_insert [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8405] - error ./configure - linux s390.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8405. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8405 error ./configure - linux s390. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7970] - Configure script does not pass arguments.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7970. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7970 Configure script does not pass arguments. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8008] - Cannot build makefile.win with djgpp awk 3.0.6, use gnu 3.0.3 or bwk awk
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8008. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8008 Cannot build makefile.win with djgpp awk 3.0.6, use gnu 3.0.3 or bwk awk [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8063] - NetBSD 1.5.2 build failure with --enable-mods-shared=all
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8063. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8063 NetBSD 1.5.2 build failure with --enable-mods-shared=all [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8064] - NetBSD 1.5.2 build failure with --enable-ssl
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8064. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8064 NetBSD 1.5.2 build failure with --enable-ssl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8150] - Unable to build on AIX 5.1 with gcc 2.95.3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8150. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8150 Unable to build on AIX 5.1 with gcc 2.95.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8166] - Compiling error
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8166. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8166 Compiling error [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
