DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13272] - Documentation doesn't mention that SSL is not in binary dist.

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13272


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 02:27 ---
While I tend to agree that ./configure could be better documented, and
especially useful would be a list of modules and their default on/off status, a
la 1.3, that's somewhat far away from the stated "bug" in the title. In addition
to which, configure *had* picked up a good deal of documentation since this bug
was last commented on. I'm going go close it, but encourage the various
commenters to open a new bug, if they desire, requesting specific additions to
the ./configure documentation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32340] New: - Windows XP SP2

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32340

   Summary: Windows XP SP2
   Product: Apache httpd-2.0
   Version: 2.0.52
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
  Severity: major
  Priority: P3
 Component: All
AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Windows XP SP2 (Home Edition) has apparently broken the Apache Web Server 
(amongst other things). The status monitor says that it is running but when I 
try to view local Web pages, IE, Netscape, Mozilla all try to load the web 
page but never do.  I tried to disable the Microsoft Firewall but it does not 
help.  

The error.log has multiple entries in it like this:
 "Sun Nov 21 18:39:43 2004] [error] (OS 10038)An operation was attempted on 
something that is not a socket.  : Child 1332: Encountered too many errors 
accepting client connections. Possible causes: dynamic address renewal, or 
incompatible VPN or firewall software. Try using the Win32DisableAcceptEx 
directive."

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32340] - Windows XP SP2

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32340





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 02:55 ---
Did you try adding 'Win32DisableAcceptEx' to your configuration file as the
error message recommended?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32340] - Windows XP SP2

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32340


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 03:10 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Did you try adding 'Win32DisableAcceptEx' to your configuration file as the
> error message recommended?

I did but I forgot to stop and restart the Apache HTTP server. DUH!!  Now that 
I restarted it, it works fine.  

Thanks!!



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28573] - Broken named anchor corresponding to '#table3' href in doc of SSLRequire directive

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28573


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 03:58 ---
Should be fixed now. Committed revision 106144 with a patch. table1 and table2
were also affected.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18101] - ServerRoot cannot be set to other folder

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18101


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 04:14 ---
A minor documentation update has been made to clarify this point. Committed
revision 106145. Closing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30553] - mod_mem_cache duplicating querystring on request to downstream server

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30553


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 11:19 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I can see the behavior described in the report with httpd-2.0.52 on both Linux
> and Solaris 9. [...]

The current Version from CVS works fine. Sorry for the noise.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28460] - apr_thread_join fails if the thread is already terminated

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28460


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 OS/Version||All
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 14:10 ---
This is fixed in 0.9.5 and 1.0.1, I think:

  *) Makes the threads to behave like on posix. If the thread is created
 without APR_DETACH expect that the thread_join will be called, so don't
 close the handle in advance, if the thread has already finished.
 [Mladen Turk]


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17560] - An additional line in the openssl instructions would be helpful

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17560





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 14:38 ---
Building openssl is pretty far beyond the scope of the Apache httpd
documentation, but, then, I suppose most of this particular doc is likewise
beyond our stated scope. I've seen remarks a few places to the effect that this
doc is moderately out of date, and needs some significant updates for 2.x, but,
unfortunately, the number of people who can do this update is pretty small.

Your remark that a particular line makes the problems go away is only half
helpful. When, in the order of other commands, should that line be added? An
actual patch to the doc would be the most helpful, but just answering that one
question would be somewhat helpful to getting this problem resolved. Please look
at the latest version of this doc, and let us know if the instructions still
work for you.

Thanks.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32322] - Files name www.php will not be found

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32322


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 14:57 ---
i guess it was some kind of caching error,
after trying it again today the file www.php would just works.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32346] New: - mod_include/include virtual checks content-type is text/

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32346

   Summary: mod_include/include virtual checks content-type is text/
   Product: Apache httpd-2.0
   Version: 2.1-HEAD
  Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: mod_include
AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I tried use , but get

> [Mon Nov 22 23:20:05 2004] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] unable to include
potential exec "bar.xhtml" in parsed file foo.xhtml

error. mod_include.c has following line:

>if (!error_fmt && (ctx->flags & SSI_FLAG_NO_EXEC) &&
>rr->content_type && strncmp(rr->content_type, "text/", 5)) {
>
>error_fmt = "unable to include potential exec \"%s\" in parsed "
>"file %s";
>}

This check is correct IncludesNoExec semantics?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14647] - apachectl doesn't sufficiently check for previously running instances

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14647


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 15:56 ---
Determining the creation time of a process would be a portability nightmare.  I
really can't see what httpd behaviour it is desirable to change here.  It's
generally desirable to do the do the kill(pid, 0) check at startup against the
old pid.  And as Andrew says the general workaround is to put the pidfile
somewhere where your initscripts will delete it at boot.  rc.sysinit deletes
/var/run/* with the Linux initscripts, for instance.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14104] - not documented: must restart server to load new CRL

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14104





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 15:04 ---
The server needs to be restarted for just about any change to take effect. It's
not clear that this is explicitly documented anywhere, and I'm not really sure
where that information should be placed where it would be effective. Any change
of configuration requires a server restart. This is not SSL specific. Perhaps an
entry in the FAQ is warranted? Thoughts?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32285] - Order doc can be misinterpreted

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32285





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 14:32 ---
The Order doc has been phrased a number of different ways, and has always
managed to be misinterpreted. So, yeah, I think that this is a problem. However,
I don't at all understand the description of the table. Can you please show an
example of the table?

I also rather disagree that the Order doc should not discuss orders. The doc
serves two purposes (ok, probably more, but at least two). The immediately
pragmatic "solve my problem now" role, and the more in depth "how does it work"
role. And it must do both, in order for the documentation to be comprehensive.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20111] - CGI-script can break error-log

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20111


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 17:08 ---
Ah, no, you had tracked it down correctly.  This is harder to hit with 2.0.50
and later which have the "CGI bucket" changes, but the remaining case is fixed
on the trunk:

http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators/mod_cgi.c?rev=106195&r1=106103&r2=106195

Thanks for the report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32346] - mod_include/include virtual checks content-type is text/

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32346


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-22 22:53 ---
The basic semantics are as intended, though it would probably be preferable to
allow application/foo+xml content types in IncludesNoExec.  I might even make
that mod.

Your report implies a valid suggestion for enhancement, but isn't really a bug
report.  In future it might be preferable to raise this kind of issue in a user
support forum.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32346] - mod_include/include virtual checks content-type is text/

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32346





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-23 00:06 ---
So, Minimum request is to permit application/foo+xml.
but I think this check is really unnecessary, and harmful.

Why it doesn't use mod_auth* to decide allow/deny(and use 'Options -ExecCGI' to
CGI...)
for virtual's Sub-requests, too?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27550] - pcre symbol issues for apache modules

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27550





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-23 00:30 ---
Please incorporate this fix?  I'll bake you cookies!

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]