DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8122] - SSLMutex option settings not honoured
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122 SSLMutex option settings not honoured [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8122] - SSLMutex option settings not honoured
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122 SSLMutex option settings not honoured --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-22 00:08 --- Please look at bug 19182, ssl.conf needs to be updated. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8122] - SSLMutex option settings not honoured
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122 SSLMutex option settings not honoured [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-24 20:38 --- Ok, the patch is backported to 2.0.45 to honor the full range of SSLMutex flavors, mirroring the AcceptMutex core directive. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8122] - SSLMutex option settings not honoured
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122 SSLMutex option settings not honoured --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-15 15:13 --- Can you please verify the options available now in the latest source base (HEAD includes Jim's patch), and close the PR if you think the problem is resolved. Thanks -Madhu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8122] - SSLMutex option settings not honoured
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122
SSLMutex option settings not honoured
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-15 18:26 ---
Sounds ok looking at the code.
In ssl_engine_mutex.c it would have been nice to us verbose eror reporting in
ssl_mutex_init and friends. See below for the relevant code of my original patch
(it did help a lot while tracking bugs):
+status = apr_global_mutex_create(mc-pMutex, mc-szMutexFile,
mc-nMutexMech, p);
+if (status != APR_SUCCESS) {
+char buf[120];
+
+apr_strerror(status, buf, sizeof(buf));
+if (mc-szMutexFile)
+ssl_log(s, SSL_LOG_ERROR,
+ Failed to create global mutex lock using file `%s':
%s,
+mc-szMutexFile, buf);
+else
+ssl_log(s, SSL_LOG_ERROR,
+ Failed to create global mutex lock: %s, buf);
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8122] - SSLMutex option settings not honoured
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122 SSLMutex option settings not honoured --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-04 23:01 --- S'funny. I didn't even see this (old) bug and had just send email to dev@ proposing the same sort of thing. I'm a very big +1 on this. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8122] - SSLMutex option settings not honoured
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122 SSLMutex option settings not honoured [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-04 13:14 --- This is a behavior change. I don't see where we have considered this patch yet, so reopening the report. Thanks for keeping up with the stale reports, Joshua! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8122] - SSLMutex option settings not honoured
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122 SSLMutex option settings not honoured [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-02 20:18 --- [This is a mass bug update.] [Resolve-20021102] No response from submitter; assuming issue is resolved. If the problem still exists in the lastest version, please reopen this report and update appropriately. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8122] - SSLMutex option settings not honoured
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122 SSLMutex option settings not honoured --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-07 09:55 --- Created an attachment (id=1801) Remove debug output in ssl_engine_config.c else same as the previous which is btw a proposed fix. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8122] - SSLMutex option settings not honoured
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122 SSLMutex option settings not honoured --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-06 16:55 --- Created an attachment (id=1794) new config behaviour - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8122] - SSLMutex option settings not honoured
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8122 SSLMutex option settings not honoured --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-06 17:01 --- The patch changes the SSLMutex command and offers these options: default | yes none | no fcntl flock sysvsem posixsem pthread sem = sysvsem | posixsem file: = fcntl | flock The meaning of yes changes to default, sem will use either Sys V or Posix semaphores (the former are preferred) and file will use either Fcntl or Flock (preferring Fcntl). The command remains (reasonably) backward compatible and is now in sync with the AcceptMutex command. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
