Re: rad(8) fails to advertise new prefix

2019-04-11 Thread Florian Obser
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 07:01:30PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> My home gateway uses DHCPv6-PD straight out of net/dhcpcd's README.
> dhcpcd requests prefix delegation from the ISP, assigns subnets to
> local interfaces, and rad(8) picks up those addresses and advertises
> the corresponding prefixes on the local networks.
> 
> I upgraded my home gateway from dhcpcd-7.1.1 and amd64 -current as
> of six weeks ago, to dhcpcd-7.1.1p4 and -current as of Apr 10.
> rad(8) now fails to notice address changes on the interfaces it
> covers.  When the address changes, it continues to advertise the
> old prefix.  I have to restart rad(8) in order to get it to advertise
> the new address.
> 
> Can anybody reproduce this problem?
> 
> I don't know if there is a bug in dhcpcd, rad, or kernel route
> message passing.
> 
> -- 
> Christian "naddy" Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de
> 

We need to event_set the correct fd :/

OK?

diff --git frontend.c frontend.c
index dc1196f379d..e32d8ce18dc 100644
--- frontend.c
+++ frontend.c
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ frontend_dispatch_main(int fd, short event, void *bula)
fatalx("%s: expected to receive imsg "
"routesocket fd but didn't receive any",
__func__);
-   event_set(&ev_route, fd, EV_READ | EV_PERSIST,
+   event_set(&ev_route, routesock, EV_READ | EV_PERSIST,
route_receive, NULL);
break;
case IMSG_STARTUP:


-- 
I'm not entirely sure you are real.



Re: rad(8) fails to advertise new prefix

2019-04-12 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Florian Obser:

> We need to event_set the correct fd :/

This fixes the problem I observed.

> OK?

ok

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de