RE: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

2018-08-06 Thread ted
Giving that a spin now; thanks!

Ted Neward
Technologist and Leader
T: @tedneward | M: (425) 647-4526
http://www.newardassociates.com

-Original Message-
From: Severin Gehwolf  
Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 1:46 AM
To: t...@tedneward.com; 'Pengfei Li' ; 'Alan Bateman' 
; kim.barr...@oracle.com; bsr...@gmail.com
Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net; 'nd' ; 
core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 01:32 -0700, t...@tedneward.com wrote:
> I'd really like to be able to build 8 and 9; particularly 8, since 
> that's what my current employer is still using. :-)

For JDK 8 we have to use:

$ bash configure ...
$ make WARNINGS_ARE_ERRORS="" \
  SCTP_WERROR= \
  ...

JDK 9+ have --disable-warnings-as-errors configure option.

Thanks,
Severin



Re: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

2018-08-06 Thread Severin Gehwolf
On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 01:32 -0700, t...@tedneward.com wrote:
> I'd really like to be able to build 8 and 9; particularly 8, since
> that's what my current employer is still using. :-)

For JDK 8 we have to use:

$ bash configure ...
$ make WARNINGS_ARE_ERRORS="" \
  SCTP_WERROR= \
  ...

JDK 9+ have --disable-warnings-as-errors configure option.

Thanks,
Severin



RE: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

2018-08-06 Thread ted
And forgot to lead with: Thanks, Pengfei! That helps a great deal.

Ted Neward
Technologist and Leader
T: @tedneward | M: (425) 647-4526
http://www.newardassociates.com

-Original Message-
From: Pengfei Li  
Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 11:26 PM
To: t...@tedneward.com; 'Alan Bateman' ; 
kim.barr...@oracle.com; bsr...@gmail.com
Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net; nd ; 
core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

Ted,

I just use --disable-warnings-as-errors in bash configure command to build jdk 
10/11 on Ubuntu 18.

--
Thanks,
Pengfei

> 
> Assuming I want to build JDK 8/9/10/11 (for research and spelunking 
> purposes), what's the best way to do that if the changes aren't going 
> to be backported? Turn off the warnings-as-errors (and what's the best 
> way to do that), or somehow downgrade glibc (on my Ubuntu 18 image)? I 
> could use advice/assistance on either approach.
> 
> Ted Neward
> Technologist and Leader
> T: @tedneward | M: (425) 647-4526
> http://www.newardassociates.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Bateman 
> Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 11:08 AM
> To: t...@tedneward.com; 'Pengfei Li' ; 
> kim.barr...@oracle.com; bsr...@gmail.com
> Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net; 'nd' ; core-libs- 
> d...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than 
> readdir_r
> 
> On 03/08/2018 20:26, t...@tedneward.com wrote:
> > Hey, all; did this get resolved? I'm still getting this error in 
> > pulled-yesterday clones of jdk8u and jdk9 and jdk10. I would prefer 
> > not to make local changes (mostly I want to build debug builds so I 
> > can spelunk the JVM bits), but if this isn't going to roll out 
> > fairly shortly I'll disable warnings-as-errors and carry on.
> >
> The changes for JDK-8202353, JDK-8202794, and JDK-8207340 are in 
> jdk/jdk for JDK 12. There are few residual issues/inconsistencies that 
> came up and are still under discussion on the mailing lists. I don't 
> think there has been any discussion yet about back porting.
> 
> -Alan




RE: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

2018-08-06 Thread ted
Well, that works for JDK 10, it seems... (building now...) but is there a 
similar way to disable warnings for JDK 8 and 9? Some combination of 
CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS, perhaps? I'd really like to be able to build 8 and 9; 
particularly 8, since that's what my current employer is still using. :-)

Ted Neward
Technologist and Leader
T: @tedneward | M: (425) 647-4526
http://www.newardassociates.com

-Original Message-
From: Pengfei Li  
Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 11:26 PM
To: t...@tedneward.com; 'Alan Bateman' ; 
kim.barr...@oracle.com; bsr...@gmail.com
Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net; nd ; 
core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

Ted,

I just use --disable-warnings-as-errors in bash configure command to build jdk 
10/11 on Ubuntu 18.

--
Thanks,
Pengfei

> 
> Assuming I want to build JDK 8/9/10/11 (for research and spelunking 
> purposes), what's the best way to do that if the changes aren't going 
> to be backported? Turn off the warnings-as-errors (and what's the best 
> way to do that), or somehow downgrade glibc (on my Ubuntu 18 image)? I 
> could use advice/assistance on either approach.
> 
> Ted Neward
> Technologist and Leader
> T: @tedneward | M: (425) 647-4526
> http://www.newardassociates.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Bateman 
> Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 11:08 AM
> To: t...@tedneward.com; 'Pengfei Li' ; 
> kim.barr...@oracle.com; bsr...@gmail.com
> Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net; 'nd' ; core-libs- 
> d...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than 
> readdir_r
> 
> On 03/08/2018 20:26, t...@tedneward.com wrote:
> > Hey, all; did this get resolved? I'm still getting this error in 
> > pulled-yesterday clones of jdk8u and jdk9 and jdk10. I would prefer 
> > not to make local changes (mostly I want to build debug builds so I 
> > can spelunk the JVM bits), but if this isn't going to roll out 
> > fairly shortly I'll disable warnings-as-errors and carry on.
> >
> The changes for JDK-8202353, JDK-8202794, and JDK-8207340 are in 
> jdk/jdk for JDK 12. There are few residual issues/inconsistencies that 
> came up and are still under discussion on the mailing lists. I don't 
> think there has been any discussion yet about back porting.
> 
> -Alan




RE: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

2018-08-05 Thread Pengfei Li
Ted,

I just use --disable-warnings-as-errors in bash configure command to build jdk 
10/11 on Ubuntu 18.

--
Thanks,
Pengfei

> 
> Assuming I want to build JDK 8/9/10/11 (for research and spelunking
> purposes), what's the best way to do that if the changes aren't going to be
> backported? Turn off the warnings-as-errors (and what's the best way to do
> that), or somehow downgrade glibc (on my Ubuntu 18 image)? I could use
> advice/assistance on either approach.
> 
> Ted Neward
> Technologist and Leader
> T: @tedneward | M: (425) 647-4526
> http://www.newardassociates.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Bateman 
> Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 11:08 AM
> To: t...@tedneward.com; 'Pengfei Li' ;
> kim.barr...@oracle.com; bsr...@gmail.com
> Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net; 'nd' ; core-libs-
> d...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than
> readdir_r
> 
> On 03/08/2018 20:26, t...@tedneward.com wrote:
> > Hey, all; did this get resolved? I'm still getting this error in
> > pulled-yesterday clones of jdk8u and jdk9 and jdk10. I would prefer
> > not to make local changes (mostly I want to build debug builds so I
> > can spelunk the JVM bits), but if this isn't going to roll out fairly
> > shortly I'll disable warnings-as-errors and carry on.
> >
> The changes for JDK-8202353, JDK-8202794, and JDK-8207340 are in jdk/jdk
> for JDK 12. There are few residual issues/inconsistencies that came up and
> are still under discussion on the mailing lists. I don't think there has been 
> any
> discussion yet about back porting.
> 
> -Alan



RE: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

2018-08-05 Thread ted
Assuming I want to build JDK 8/9/10/11 (for research and spelunking purposes), 
what's the best way to do that if the changes aren't going to be backported? 
Turn off the warnings-as-errors (and what's the best way to do that), or 
somehow downgrade glibc (on my Ubuntu 18 image)? I could use advice/assistance 
on either approach.

Ted Neward
Technologist and Leader
T: @tedneward | M: (425) 647-4526
http://www.newardassociates.com

-Original Message-
From: Alan Bateman  
Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2018 11:08 AM
To: t...@tedneward.com; 'Pengfei Li' ; 
kim.barr...@oracle.com; bsr...@gmail.com
Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net; 'nd' ; 
core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

On 03/08/2018 20:26, t...@tedneward.com wrote:
> Hey, all; did this get resolved? I'm still getting this error in 
> pulled-yesterday clones of jdk8u and jdk9 and jdk10. I would prefer 
> not to make local changes (mostly I want to build debug builds so I 
> can spelunk the JVM bits), but if this isn't going to roll out fairly 
> shortly I'll disable warnings-as-errors and carry on.
>
The changes for JDK-8202353, JDK-8202794, and JDK-8207340 are in jdk/jdk for 
JDK 12. There are few residual issues/inconsistencies that came up and are 
still under discussion on the mailing lists. I don't think there has been any 
discussion yet about back porting.

-Alan



Re: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

2018-08-05 Thread Alan Bateman

On 03/08/2018 20:26, t...@tedneward.com wrote:

Hey, all; did this get resolved? I'm still getting this error in
pulled-yesterday clones of jdk8u and jdk9 and jdk10. I would prefer not to
make local changes (mostly I want to build debug builds so I can spelunk the
JVM bits), but if this isn't going to roll out fairly shortly I'll disable
warnings-as-errors and carry on.

The changes for JDK-8202353, JDK-8202794, and JDK-8207340 are in jdk/jdk 
for JDK 12. There are few residual issues/inconsistencies that came up 
and are still under discussion on the mailing lists. I don't think there 
has been any discussion yet about back porting.


-Alan


RE: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than readdir_r

2018-08-03 Thread ted
Hey, all; did this get resolved? I'm still getting this error in
pulled-yesterday clones of jdk8u and jdk9 and jdk10. I would prefer not to
make local changes (mostly I want to build debug builds so I can spelunk the
JVM bits), but if this isn't going to roll out fairly shortly I'll disable
warnings-as-errors and carry on.

Ted Neward
Technologist and Leader
T: @tedneward | M: (425) 647-4526
http://www.newardassociates.com

-Original Message-
From: build-dev  On Behalf Of Pengfei Li
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 3:01 AM
To: kim.barr...@oracle.com; bsr...@gmail.com
Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net; nd ;
core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RFR: 8202794: Native Unix code should use readdir rather than
readdir_r

Hi

Last month, Bernard proposed a patch to fix the OpenJDK build issue with
recent versions of glibc.
See
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2018-May/052991.html
But this fix requires to be tested on all POSIX systems before getting
integrated.

As recently, more and more guys are complaining about the OpenJDK build
failure issue, shall we just add the following workaround to upstream before
Bernard's real fix eventually merged?


diff --git a/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/TimeZone_md.c
b/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/TimeZone_md.c
index f0bb362afc..e156381acd 100644
--- a/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/TimeZone_md.c
+++ b/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/TimeZone_md.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ findZoneinfoFile(char *buf, size_t size, const char
*dir)
 (void) closedir(dirp);
 return NULL;
 }
-
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations"
 while (readdir64_r(dirp, entry, &dp) == 0 && dp != NULL) {
 /*
  * Skip '.' and '..' (and possibly other .* files) diff --git
a/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/UnixFileSystem_md.c
b/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/UnixFileSystem_md.c
index 315aa92b64..5b9554dd47 100644
--- a/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/UnixFileSystem_md.c
+++ b/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/UnixFileSystem_md.c
@@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ Java_java_io_UnixFileSystem_list(JNIEnv *env, jobject
this,
 if (rv == NULL) goto error;

 /* Scan the directory */
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations"
 while ((readdir64_r(dir, ptr, &result) == 0)  && (result != NULL)) {
 jstring name;
 if (!strcmp(ptr->d_name, ".") || !strcmp(ptr->d_name, "..")) diff
--git a/src/java.base/unix/native/libnio/fs/UnixNativeDispatcher.c
b/src/java.base/unix/native/libnio/fs/UnixNativeDispatcher.c
index 53bb1c1009..72c38eb9a6 100644
--- a/src/java.base/unix/native/libnio/fs/UnixNativeDispatcher.c
+++ b/src/java.base/unix/native/libnio/fs/UnixNativeDispatcher.c
@@ -731,6 +731,7 @@ Java_sun_nio_fs_UnixNativeDispatcher_readdir(JNIEnv*
env, jclass this, jlong val

 /* EINTR not listed as a possible error */
 /* TDB: reentrant version probably not required here */
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations"
 res = readdir64_r(dirp, ptr, &result);

#ifdef _AIX
diff --git
a/src/jdk.management/unix/native/libmanagement_ext/OperatingSystemImpl.c
b/src/jdk.management/unix/native/libmanagement_ext/OperatingSystemImpl.c
index 1adeaf7bb5..080cf2a89b 100644
--- a/src/jdk.management/unix/native/libmanagement_ext/OperatingSystemImpl.c
+++ b/src/jdk.management/unix/native/libmanagement_ext/OperatingSystemIm
+++ pl.c
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ static struct dirent* read_dir(DIR* dirp, struct dirent*
entry) {
 return dbuf;
#else /* __linux__ || _ALLBSD_SOURCE */
 struct dirent* p;
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations"
 if (readdir_r(dirp, entry, &p) == 0) {
 return p;
 } else {


--
Thanks,
Pengfei