Re: RFR: JDK-8231974: Build fails if no common legal notices are present
LGTM. /Magnus > 8 okt. 2019 kl. 21:24 skrev Erik Joelsson : > > In certain Oracle build configurations, the common legal output directory is > never created, because there are no legal files to put in it. This should not > make the build fail. This patch makes adding the --legal-notices parameter to > jmod optional. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231974 > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8231974/webrev.01/ > > /Erik >
Re: RFR: JDK-8231974: Build fails if no common legal notices are present
Looks okay to me. Mandy On 10/8/19 12:24 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: In certain Oracle build configurations, the common legal output directory is never created, because there are no legal files to put in it. This should not make the build fail. This patch makes adding the --legal-notices parameter to jmod optional. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231974 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8231974/webrev.01/ /Erik
Re: RFR: JDK-8231974: Build fails if no common legal notices are present
Looks good to me. Thanks, David On 9/10/2019 5:24 am, Erik Joelsson wrote: In certain Oracle build configurations, the common legal output directory is never created, because there are no legal files to put in it. This should not make the build fail. This patch makes adding the --legal-notices parameter to jmod optional. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231974 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8231974/webrev.01/ /Erik
RFR: JDK-8231974: Build fails if no common legal notices are present
In certain Oracle build configurations, the common legal output directory is never created, because there are no legal files to put in it. This should not make the build fail. This patch makes adding the --legal-notices parameter to jmod optional. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231974 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8231974/webrev.01/ /Erik