Re: build failure in perfMemory_solaris.cpp?
Hi, is somebody working on this issue? It's really annoying that is is not possible to build on plain Solaris 11 system any more. Regards, Volker On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:32 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote: The Solaris problem doesn't appear when using our S10u6 devkits so wasn't noticed internally. It isn't clear exactly when Solaris decided to switch from SVR4 definition to POSIX definition. Not sure if we want ugly ifdefs or wait until our official compiler set encounters the problem. Can't comment on the AIX situation. David On 24/01/2015 8:07 AM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: by the timing when this started to happen, I believe this was caused by the CPU changes integrated into jdk9/dev on Wednesday (they didn't come through jdk9/hs). I went to check those changesets and this looks like the prime suspect: Changeset: c656c7540cb1 Author:gthornbr Date: 2014-11-17 15:51 -0500 URL:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs/hotspot/rev/c656c7540cb1 8050807: Better performing performance data handling Reviewed-by: dcubed, pnauman, ctornqvi, dholmes, mschoene Contributed-by:gerald.thornbr...@oracle.com ! src/os/bsd/vm/perfMemory_bsd.cpp ! src/os/linux/vm/perfMemory_linux.cpp ! src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp ! src/share/vm/utilities/vmError.cpp Jerry, I'm assigning the bug to you. Check it out and reassign if needed Alejandro On 1/23/2015 11:26 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: I created one: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071501 Tony On 01/23/2015 10:07 AM, Bradford Wetmore wrote: Is there a bug id yet? I haven't seen one showing up in a quick search for dd_fd or perfMemory_solaris.cpp. For the record, I'm on what I think is the required platform/compilers: % uname -a SunOS sca00bkv 5.11 11.1 sun4v sparc sun4v % more /etc/release Oracle Solaris 11.1 SPARC Copyright (c) 1983, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Assembled 06 November 2013 % grep BUILD_CC out.txt BUILD_CC:= /java/devtools/sparc/SUNWspro/SS12u3/bin/cc Brad On 1/23/2015 8:32 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: Hi, we can see the same in our nightly OpenJDK 8/9 builds (http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/ppc-aix-port/) and would be interested in a solution as well. Thanks, Volker On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:19 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Anthony, On 23/01/2015 10:33 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: Hi, I just pulled the jdk9/dev gate today and hit a build failure on SPARC Solaris 11.1 when compiling perfMemory_solaris.cpp in hotspot. I'm using SS12u3 compilers. Anyone else see a similar error or know what might be going wrong? ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 337: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 369: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. gmake[8]: *** [perfMemory_solaris.o] Error 2 This code was brought in via the recent CPU integration of bug 8050807. (Hi Jerry! - cc'd) It looks like Solaris has two potential definitions of DIR: #if defined(__USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__) /* traditional SVR4 definition */ typedef struct { int dd_fd; /* file descriptor */ int dd_loc; /* offset in block */ int dd_size;/* amount of valid data */ char*dd_buf;/* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #else /* default definition (POSIX conformant) */ typedef struct { int d_fd; /* file descriptor */ int d_loc; /* offset in block */ int d_size; /* amount of valid data */ char*d_buf; /* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #endif /* __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ */ I can't see what controls __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ but presumably either something in Solaris 11.1, or something in SS12u3 is causing this difference. David thanks Tony
Re: build failure in perfMemory_solaris.cpp?
Hi Volker, On 4/02/2015 3:09 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: Hi, is somebody working on this issue? It is assigned to Gerald but I don't know what his current priorities are. Also I hope we're trying to figure out whether the best way to fix this is to change the code or change the build flags - but that needs info from the Studio compiler folk. David It's really annoying that is is not possible to build on plain Solaris 11 system any more. Regards, Volker On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:32 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote: The Solaris problem doesn't appear when using our S10u6 devkits so wasn't noticed internally. It isn't clear exactly when Solaris decided to switch from SVR4 definition to POSIX definition. Not sure if we want ugly ifdefs or wait until our official compiler set encounters the problem. Can't comment on the AIX situation. David On 24/01/2015 8:07 AM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: by the timing when this started to happen, I believe this was caused by the CPU changes integrated into jdk9/dev on Wednesday (they didn't come through jdk9/hs). I went to check those changesets and this looks like the prime suspect: Changeset: c656c7540cb1 Author:gthornbr Date: 2014-11-17 15:51 -0500 URL:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs/hotspot/rev/c656c7540cb1 8050807: Better performing performance data handling Reviewed-by: dcubed, pnauman, ctornqvi, dholmes, mschoene Contributed-by:gerald.thornbr...@oracle.com ! src/os/bsd/vm/perfMemory_bsd.cpp ! src/os/linux/vm/perfMemory_linux.cpp ! src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp ! src/share/vm/utilities/vmError.cpp Jerry, I'm assigning the bug to you. Check it out and reassign if needed Alejandro On 1/23/2015 11:26 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: I created one: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071501 Tony On 01/23/2015 10:07 AM, Bradford Wetmore wrote: Is there a bug id yet? I haven't seen one showing up in a quick search for dd_fd or perfMemory_solaris.cpp. For the record, I'm on what I think is the required platform/compilers: % uname -a SunOS sca00bkv 5.11 11.1 sun4v sparc sun4v % more /etc/release Oracle Solaris 11.1 SPARC Copyright (c) 1983, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Assembled 06 November 2013 % grep BUILD_CC out.txt BUILD_CC:= /java/devtools/sparc/SUNWspro/SS12u3/bin/cc Brad On 1/23/2015 8:32 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: Hi, we can see the same in our nightly OpenJDK 8/9 builds (http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/ppc-aix-port/) and would be interested in a solution as well. Thanks, Volker On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:19 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Anthony, On 23/01/2015 10:33 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: Hi, I just pulled the jdk9/dev gate today and hit a build failure on SPARC Solaris 11.1 when compiling perfMemory_solaris.cpp in hotspot. I'm using SS12u3 compilers. Anyone else see a similar error or know what might be going wrong? ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 337: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 369: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. gmake[8]: *** [perfMemory_solaris.o] Error 2 This code was brought in via the recent CPU integration of bug 8050807. (Hi Jerry! - cc'd) It looks like Solaris has two potential definitions of DIR: #if defined(__USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__) /* traditional SVR4 definition */ typedef struct { int dd_fd; /* file descriptor */ int dd_loc; /* offset in block */ int dd_size;/* amount of valid data */ char*dd_buf;/* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #else /* default definition (POSIX conformant) */ typedef struct { int d_fd; /* file descriptor */ int d_loc; /* offset in block */ int d_size; /* amount of valid data */ char*d_buf; /* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #endif /* __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ */ I can't see what controls __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ but presumably either something in Solaris 11.1, or something in SS12u3 is causing this difference. David thanks Tony
Re: build failure in perfMemory_solaris.cpp?
Hi, we can see the same in our nightly OpenJDK 8/9 builds (http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/ppc-aix-port/) and would be interested in a solution as well. Thanks, Volker On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:19 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Anthony, On 23/01/2015 10:33 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: Hi, I just pulled the jdk9/dev gate today and hit a build failure on SPARC Solaris 11.1 when compiling perfMemory_solaris.cpp in hotspot. I'm using SS12u3 compilers. Anyone else see a similar error or know what might be going wrong? ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 337: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 369: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. gmake[8]: *** [perfMemory_solaris.o] Error 2 This code was brought in via the recent CPU integration of bug 8050807. (Hi Jerry! - cc'd) It looks like Solaris has two potential definitions of DIR: #if defined(__USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__) /* traditional SVR4 definition */ typedef struct { int dd_fd; /* file descriptor */ int dd_loc; /* offset in block */ int dd_size;/* amount of valid data */ char*dd_buf;/* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #else /* default definition (POSIX conformant) */ typedef struct { int d_fd; /* file descriptor */ int d_loc; /* offset in block */ int d_size; /* amount of valid data */ char*d_buf; /* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #endif /* __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ */ I can't see what controls __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ but presumably either something in Solaris 11.1, or something in SS12u3 is causing this difference. David thanks Tony
Re: build failure in perfMemory_solaris.cpp?
Is there a bug id yet? I haven't seen one showing up in a quick search for dd_fd or perfMemory_solaris.cpp. For the record, I'm on what I think is the required platform/compilers: % uname -a SunOS sca00bkv 5.11 11.1 sun4v sparc sun4v % more /etc/release Oracle Solaris 11.1 SPARC Copyright (c) 1983, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Assembled 06 November 2013 % grep BUILD_CC out.txt BUILD_CC:= /java/devtools/sparc/SUNWspro/SS12u3/bin/cc Brad On 1/23/2015 8:32 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: Hi, we can see the same in our nightly OpenJDK 8/9 builds (http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/ppc-aix-port/) and would be interested in a solution as well. Thanks, Volker On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:19 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Anthony, On 23/01/2015 10:33 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: Hi, I just pulled the jdk9/dev gate today and hit a build failure on SPARC Solaris 11.1 when compiling perfMemory_solaris.cpp in hotspot. I'm using SS12u3 compilers. Anyone else see a similar error or know what might be going wrong? ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 337: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 369: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. gmake[8]: *** [perfMemory_solaris.o] Error 2 This code was brought in via the recent CPU integration of bug 8050807. (Hi Jerry! - cc'd) It looks like Solaris has two potential definitions of DIR: #if defined(__USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__) /* traditional SVR4 definition */ typedef struct { int dd_fd; /* file descriptor */ int dd_loc; /* offset in block */ int dd_size;/* amount of valid data */ char*dd_buf;/* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #else /* default definition (POSIX conformant) */ typedef struct { int d_fd; /* file descriptor */ int d_loc; /* offset in block */ int d_size; /* amount of valid data */ char*d_buf; /* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #endif /* __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ */ I can't see what controls __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ but presumably either something in Solaris 11.1, or something in SS12u3 is causing this difference. David thanks Tony
Re: build failure in perfMemory_solaris.cpp?
I created one: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071501 Tony On 01/23/2015 10:07 AM, Bradford Wetmore wrote: Is there a bug id yet? I haven't seen one showing up in a quick search for dd_fd or perfMemory_solaris.cpp. For the record, I'm on what I think is the required platform/compilers: % uname -a SunOS sca00bkv 5.11 11.1 sun4v sparc sun4v % more /etc/release Oracle Solaris 11.1 SPARC Copyright (c) 1983, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Assembled 06 November 2013 % grep BUILD_CC out.txt BUILD_CC:= /java/devtools/sparc/SUNWspro/SS12u3/bin/cc Brad On 1/23/2015 8:32 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: Hi, we can see the same in our nightly OpenJDK 8/9 builds (http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/ppc-aix-port/) and would be interested in a solution as well. Thanks, Volker On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:19 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Anthony, On 23/01/2015 10:33 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: Hi, I just pulled the jdk9/dev gate today and hit a build failure on SPARC Solaris 11.1 when compiling perfMemory_solaris.cpp in hotspot. I'm using SS12u3 compilers. Anyone else see a similar error or know what might be going wrong? ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 337: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 369: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. gmake[8]: *** [perfMemory_solaris.o] Error 2 This code was brought in via the recent CPU integration of bug 8050807. (Hi Jerry! - cc'd) It looks like Solaris has two potential definitions of DIR: #if defined(__USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__) /* traditional SVR4 definition */ typedef struct { int dd_fd; /* file descriptor */ int dd_loc; /* offset in block */ int dd_size;/* amount of valid data */ char*dd_buf;/* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #else /* default definition (POSIX conformant) */ typedef struct { int d_fd; /* file descriptor */ int d_loc; /* offset in block */ int d_size; /* amount of valid data */ char*d_buf; /* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #endif /* __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ */ I can't see what controls __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ but presumably either something in Solaris 11.1, or something in SS12u3 is causing this difference. David thanks Tony
Re: build failure in perfMemory_solaris.cpp?
by the timing when this started to happen, I believe this was caused by the CPU changes integrated into jdk9/dev on Wednesday (they didn't come through jdk9/hs). I went to check those changesets and this looks like the prime suspect: Changeset: c656c7540cb1 Author:gthornbr Date: 2014-11-17 15:51 -0500 URL:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs/hotspot/rev/c656c7540cb1 8050807: Better performing performance data handling Reviewed-by: dcubed, pnauman, ctornqvi, dholmes, mschoene Contributed-by:gerald.thornbr...@oracle.com ! src/os/bsd/vm/perfMemory_bsd.cpp ! src/os/linux/vm/perfMemory_linux.cpp ! src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp ! src/share/vm/utilities/vmError.cpp Jerry, I'm assigning the bug to you. Check it out and reassign if needed Alejandro On 1/23/2015 11:26 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: I created one: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071501 Tony On 01/23/2015 10:07 AM, Bradford Wetmore wrote: Is there a bug id yet? I haven't seen one showing up in a quick search for dd_fd or perfMemory_solaris.cpp. For the record, I'm on what I think is the required platform/compilers: % uname -a SunOS sca00bkv 5.11 11.1 sun4v sparc sun4v % more /etc/release Oracle Solaris 11.1 SPARC Copyright (c) 1983, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Assembled 06 November 2013 % grep BUILD_CC out.txt BUILD_CC:= /java/devtools/sparc/SUNWspro/SS12u3/bin/cc Brad On 1/23/2015 8:32 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: Hi, we can see the same in our nightly OpenJDK 8/9 builds (http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/ppc-aix-port/) and would be interested in a solution as well. Thanks, Volker On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:19 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Anthony, On 23/01/2015 10:33 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: Hi, I just pulled the jdk9/dev gate today and hit a build failure on SPARC Solaris 11.1 when compiling perfMemory_solaris.cpp in hotspot. I'm using SS12u3 compilers. Anyone else see a similar error or know what might be going wrong? ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 337: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 369: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. gmake[8]: *** [perfMemory_solaris.o] Error 2 This code was brought in via the recent CPU integration of bug 8050807. (Hi Jerry! - cc'd) It looks like Solaris has two potential definitions of DIR: #if defined(__USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__) /* traditional SVR4 definition */ typedef struct { int dd_fd; /* file descriptor */ int dd_loc; /* offset in block */ int dd_size;/* amount of valid data */ char*dd_buf;/* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #else /* default definition (POSIX conformant) */ typedef struct { int d_fd; /* file descriptor */ int d_loc; /* offset in block */ int d_size; /* amount of valid data */ char*d_buf; /* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #endif /* __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ */ I can't see what controls __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ but presumably either something in Solaris 11.1, or something in SS12u3 is causing this difference. David thanks Tony -- Alejandro
Re: build failure in perfMemory_solaris.cpp?
The Solaris problem doesn't appear when using our S10u6 devkits so wasn't noticed internally. It isn't clear exactly when Solaris decided to switch from SVR4 definition to POSIX definition. Not sure if we want ugly ifdefs or wait until our official compiler set encounters the problem. Can't comment on the AIX situation. David On 24/01/2015 8:07 AM, Alejandro E Murillo wrote: by the timing when this started to happen, I believe this was caused by the CPU changes integrated into jdk9/dev on Wednesday (they didn't come through jdk9/hs). I went to check those changesets and this looks like the prime suspect: Changeset: c656c7540cb1 Author:gthornbr Date: 2014-11-17 15:51 -0500 URL:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs/hotspot/rev/c656c7540cb1 8050807: Better performing performance data handling Reviewed-by: dcubed, pnauman, ctornqvi, dholmes, mschoene Contributed-by:gerald.thornbr...@oracle.com ! src/os/bsd/vm/perfMemory_bsd.cpp ! src/os/linux/vm/perfMemory_linux.cpp ! src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp ! src/share/vm/utilities/vmError.cpp Jerry, I'm assigning the bug to you. Check it out and reassign if needed Alejandro On 1/23/2015 11:26 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: I created one: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071501 Tony On 01/23/2015 10:07 AM, Bradford Wetmore wrote: Is there a bug id yet? I haven't seen one showing up in a quick search for dd_fd or perfMemory_solaris.cpp. For the record, I'm on what I think is the required platform/compilers: % uname -a SunOS sca00bkv 5.11 11.1 sun4v sparc sun4v % more /etc/release Oracle Solaris 11.1 SPARC Copyright (c) 1983, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Assembled 06 November 2013 % grep BUILD_CC out.txt BUILD_CC:= /java/devtools/sparc/SUNWspro/SS12u3/bin/cc Brad On 1/23/2015 8:32 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: Hi, we can see the same in our nightly OpenJDK 8/9 builds (http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/ppc-aix-port/) and would be interested in a solution as well. Thanks, Volker On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:19 AM, David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Anthony, On 23/01/2015 10:33 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: Hi, I just pulled the jdk9/dev gate today and hit a build failure on SPARC Solaris 11.1 when compiling perfMemory_solaris.cpp in hotspot. I'm using SS12u3 compilers. Anyone else see a similar error or know what might be going wrong? ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 337: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 369: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. gmake[8]: *** [perfMemory_solaris.o] Error 2 This code was brought in via the recent CPU integration of bug 8050807. (Hi Jerry! - cc'd) It looks like Solaris has two potential definitions of DIR: #if defined(__USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__) /* traditional SVR4 definition */ typedef struct { int dd_fd; /* file descriptor */ int dd_loc; /* offset in block */ int dd_size;/* amount of valid data */ char*dd_buf;/* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #else /* default definition (POSIX conformant) */ typedef struct { int d_fd; /* file descriptor */ int d_loc; /* offset in block */ int d_size; /* amount of valid data */ char*d_buf; /* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #endif /* __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ */ I can't see what controls __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ but presumably either something in Solaris 11.1, or something in SS12u3 is causing this difference. David thanks Tony
Re: build failure in perfMemory_solaris.cpp?
Hi Anthony, On 23/01/2015 10:33 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: Hi, I just pulled the jdk9/dev gate today and hit a build failure on SPARC Solaris 11.1 when compiling perfMemory_solaris.cpp in hotspot. I'm using SS12u3 compilers. Anyone else see a similar error or know what might be going wrong? ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 337: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 369: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. gmake[8]: *** [perfMemory_solaris.o] Error 2 This code was brought in via the recent CPU integration of bug 8050807. (Hi Jerry! - cc'd) It looks like Solaris has two potential definitions of DIR: #if defined(__USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__) /* traditional SVR4 definition */ typedef struct { int dd_fd; /* file descriptor */ int dd_loc; /* offset in block */ int dd_size;/* amount of valid data */ char*dd_buf;/* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #else /* default definition (POSIX conformant) */ typedef struct { int d_fd; /* file descriptor */ int d_loc; /* offset in block */ int d_size; /* amount of valid data */ char*d_buf; /* directory block */ } DIR; /* stream data from opendir() */ #endif /* __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ */ I can't see what controls __USE_LEGACY_PROTOTYPES__ but presumably either something in Solaris 11.1, or something in SS12u3 is causing this difference. David thanks Tony
build failure in perfMemory_solaris.cpp?
Hi, I just pulled the jdk9/dev gate today and hit a build failure on SPARC Solaris 11.1 when compiling perfMemory_solaris.cpp in hotspot. I'm using SS12u3 compilers. Anyone else see a similar error or know what might be going wrong? ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 337: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. ...hotspot/src/os/solaris/vm/perfMemory_solaris.cpp, line 369: Error: dd_fd is not a member of DIR. gmake[8]: *** [perfMemory_solaris.o] Error 2 thanks Tony