Re: RFR: 8316645: RISC-V: Remove dependency on libatomic by adding cmpxchg 1b
On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 16:27:48 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote: >> Hi all, please consider. >> >> latomic is used for non native atomic operation which causes problems with >> extra dependency. >> This have been fixed in recent gcc, so latomic is no longer needed. >> >> Added new gtest, passes t1 on vf2/qemu. > > Nice! @Hamlin-Li thanks! - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15919#issuecomment-1742131713
Integrated: 8316645: RISC-V: Remove dependency on libatomic by adding cmpxchg 1b
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:04:49 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote: > Hi all, please consider. > > latomic is used for non native atomic operation which causes problems with > extra dependency. > This have been fixed in recent gcc, so latomic is no longer needed. > > Added new gtest, passes t1 on vf2/qemu. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: fb055e7e Author:Robbin Ehn URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/fb055e7e5300958b2a6a290aa6783e8ede929d9a Stats: 124 lines in 3 files changed: 118 ins; 6 del; 0 mod 8316645: RISC-V: Remove dependency on libatomic by adding cmpxchg 1b Reviewed-by: ihse, fyang, luhenry, mli - PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15919
Re: RFR: 8314488: Compile the JDK as C++17
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 01:41:16 GMT, Julian Waters wrote: > Implementation of [JEP draft: Compile the JDK as > C++17](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310260) We're not changing it for existing releases. I don't think non-LTS releases play a significant role regarding such compatibility. Next LTS is supposed to be JDK 25 (2025-09-16, https://www.java.com/releases/). - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14988#issuecomment-1742099242
Re: RFR: 8314488: Compile the JDK as C++17
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 01:41:16 GMT, Julian Waters wrote: > Implementation of [JEP draft: Compile the JDK as > C++17](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310260) Requiring xlc17 aka openxl means any AIX rte requirements change as well. Binary compatibility, rte , etc. - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14988#issuecomment-1741985638
