Re: Missing binaries / build system
On 16 April 2024 20:13:15 CEST, anatoly techtonik wrote: >Hi, > >I want to use busybox_HTTPD as a minimal web server for serving >static files in a container. > >busybox_HTTPD 2022-01-17 18:54 97K > >Unfortunately, the binaries https://busybox.net/downloads/binaries/ >are only available for unstable 1.35.0 > >I tried to see what it takes to compile it (and make it really minimal) >for the latest stable 1.36.1 release, but my knowledge of Makefile >compilation toolchain is insufficient for the task. > >If there is a description of build automation that is used to make >binary releases, maybe I can send some patches to fix it, To build a busybox with just one applet make allnoconfig make menuconfig # select the applet(s) you need make ./busybox will then support the selected applets. HTH ___ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
Re: [PATCH] tc: Fix compilation with Linux v6.8-rc1
On 23 March 2024 18:04:29 CET, "Uwe Kleine-König" wrote: >From: Uwe Kleine-König > >Linux v6.8-rc1 removed the definitions related to CBQ making tc fail to >build. Add some #ifdefs to handle this missing support. >--- >Hello, > >this is just a minimal patch to make tc compile again. Maybe it makes >more sense to drop cbq completely?? Yes, iirc there was a patch around to do just that. But i'd defer to the big tc (there is nothing left on our old impl) unless someone wants to have a look? thanks ___ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
Re: [PATCH] util-linux/lsusb.c: print manufacturer/product strings if available
On 14 December 2023 08:22:36 CET, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> "Aleksander" == Aleksander Mazur writes: > > > Hi, > > AFAIR similar problem applies to util-linux/lspci.c. > > Do you build busybox with shell enabled? > > Instead of busybox's lspci/lsusb I use 2 quite simple shell scripts > > (working in hush). > >Yes, lsusb/lspci are really simple applets, but given that they already >exist we might as well make them more useful. > Is it worth the wattage, though? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SmZVhImx1pY Maybe it is (not, so far)? ___ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
