[BVARC] Gun Net tonight

2017-02-21 Thread Jo Keener via BVARC
The gun net will start up at 7:30 pm.

Open discussion on guns, firearms and any thing else you like.

Jo.L. Keener
KE7NSB
___
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org


Re: [BVARC] IoT

2017-02-21 Thread NIzar Mullani via BVARC
Tom.

Wow! You have a different perspective on IoT and I would like to share it with 
others before the Hamfest presentation. Maybe, we should have a discussion 
session after the presentation by Dr. Sanchez-Sinencio about the potential 
implications of IoT on our lives. Other issues we need to discuss are security 
and privacy when everything is connected to everything.

Nizar

-Original Message-
From: Tom M. Morton [mailto:t...@w5tom.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 2:37 PM
To: Nizar Mullani
Subject: IoT

Nizar:

I enjoyed running into you and Linda at lunch today.  Thanks for making me 
aware of "IoT" and Professor Edgar Sanchez-Sinencio, who is scheduled to talk 
at the GHHF.  I have been thinking of this for a few years now, and I am glad 
it has a name now.  It looks like soon everything will be talking to everything 
and everybody and we humans will be relegated to walking around in a WiFi fog 
that is connected to the cloud.  After all fog is a cloud that is on the 
ground.  We won't have to be "chipped" so the government can keep track of us, 
everything in our pockets, our clothes, our cars, our houses and even our trash 
cans will create an identity of us in the cloud that now will extend to the 
ground as a WiFi fog that will follow us wherever we go.

Three big problems face us.  First: where is it all going.  What monster will 
be created when all the current technologies mature and are interconnected?  
Second: will man be able to control it? Third: 
obviously there will be a very few who understand the technology.  By 
definition they will control it and the people of the world dependent on it.  
Gee, I hope they are good people and wield their power benevolently...Nah, 
absolute power has never been benevolent.

I look forward to talking about this some more next time we meet.  Bring your 
fog lights!

Tom




___
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org


Re: [BVARC] Net

2017-02-21 Thread Howard Bingham via BVARC
I have no problem checking into the BVARC PSN with my ICOM W32A in Deer 
Park, with ETA to be 35 miles line of sight from Deer Park.


However did not check in last night due to weather, so don't know if I 
would have had the same problems..


Would really like to check in on my 50 watt Kenwood TM-G707A, but sister 
does NOT PERMIT antennas on her house (Worse situation than HOA issues 
reported by others.).


73

Howard Bingham

KE5APJ

--

On 2/20/2017 8:25 PM, Chris Boone via BVARC wrote:

I have been trying to check into the net since it start and everybody keeps 
walking over my 5watt Motorola HT1250 handheld from Pasadena..this is crap!! My 
94 in Beaumont can hear the same HT 25 miles away yet this damn pos at 800ft 
can't hear me in Pasadena?? Wth??

Also why aren't portables called first?? Most VHF nets I know call portables 
first then mobiles.. calling both makes HTs compete with full power mobiles and 
that's not right!

Meanwhile someone fix the damn rptr!! It's an alligator with poor ears.. I run 
the same Kenwood on the Vidor 94 and it's balanced for 40w mobiles.. The 
Houston 94 is crap compared to what it USED to be.. if I could hear it I could 
work it.. but NOW it can be half scale and 40w can't even talk to it..

That's piss poor rptr operation

Chris
WB5ITT
Trustee W5APX
Former WR5AOK

The above are my personal and professional opinions and not those of my 
employer..so there



--

___
BVARC mailing list
BVARC@bvarc.org
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org