Re: [Cake] some comprehensive arm64 w/cake results

2023-09-17 Thread Jonathan Morton via Cake
On Monday, 18 September 2023, Dave Taht via Cake wrote:
> A huge thanks to dave seddon for buckling down and doing some comprehensive
> testing of a variety of arm64 gear!
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HxIU_TEBI6xG9jRHlr8rzyyxFEN43zMcJXUFlRuhiUI/edit#heading=h.bpvv3vr500nw

I'm really not sure it's valid to compare fq_codel on default settings 
(equivalent to rtt 100ms) to Cake on 1ms and 3ms rtt settings.  At such tight 
settings you're asking Cake to hold the queue down to a fifth of a millisecond, 
and we already know from L4S that's a fool's errand.  The internal overheads of 
the Linux kernel will give you delays of that order already.

At least include a run with Cake similarly on rtt 100ms, which is the default 
and what most Internet facing CPE would run.  You may well find that throughput 
improves significantly. 

  -  Jonathan Morton
Sent from my Sailfish device
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake


[Cake] some comprehensive arm64 w/cake results

2023-09-17 Thread Dave Taht via Cake
A huge thanks to dave seddon for buckling down and doing some comprehensive
testing of a variety of arm64 gear!

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HxIU_TEBI6xG9jRHlr8rzyyxFEN43zMcJXUFlRuhiUI/edit#heading=h.bpvv3vr500nw

-- 
Oct 30: https://netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
___
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake