Custom helpers not available on error pages
Hi Ive set up some custom error pages which include the main layout (including navigation) for e.g. page not found errors. In the header-element included I make use of a custom helper (MyTextHelper extends TextHelper). Unfortunatley this custom helper is not used in the error page resulting in a warning call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback. How can I make this custom helper available on error pages? CakePHP 2.6.4 Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Custom helpers not available on error pages
Ok, thanks :) How can I do this (overriding a core helper on these error pages)? Regards, Frank Am Montag, 11. Mai 2015 18:25:25 UTC+2 schrieb LDSign: Hi Ive set up some custom error pages which include the main layout (including navigation) for e.g. page not found errors. In the header-element included I make use of a custom helper (MyTextHelper extends TextHelper). Unfortunatley this custom helper is not used in the error page resulting in a warning call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback. How can I make this custom helper available on error pages? CakePHP 2.6.4 Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
CakePHP 2.6: Check if form has any required fields on form create
Hi I would like to add a required description (e.g. * indicates required field) on forms automatically if the form has at least one required field. Is there any method, which could be used to check this on form create? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Custom method in custom LogEngine
Hi
Ive created a custom DatabaseLog Engine which logs to the database. I would
like to save the user too, so I have this method:
public function write($type, $message,$user_id = null) {
if (empty($user_id)) {
$user_id = CakeSession::read('Auth.User.id');
}
$log['action'] = $type;
$log['user_id'] = (empty($user_id)) ? null : $user_id;
$log['description'] = $message;
$log['remote_address'] = ($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] == '::1') ? '127.0.0.1' :
$_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'];
$log['created'] = date('Y-m-d H:i:s');
$this-Log-create();
return $this-Log-save($log);
}
This works if the user is logged in (Auth.User.id is set). But when the
user is logged out, I would like to set the user_id manually. So I have put
the user_id in the parameter list of this method.
But the LogEngine ignores this additional parameter. A custom method (like
the convience ones) will be irgnored too:
public function user($message,$user_id = null) {
$log['action'] = 'user';
$log['user_id'] = (empty($user_id)) ? null : $user_id;
$log['description'] = $message;
$log['remote_address'] = ($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] == '::1') ? '127.0.0.1' :
$_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'];
$log['created'] = date('Y-m-d H:i:s');
$this-Log-create();
return $this-Log-save($log);
}
How can I achieve to give the write method the user_id on the way?
Thanks,
Frank
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: CacheEngine and garbage collection
Yes, of course, I know ;)
Ive figured it out already,,,
'prefix' = false was the little wrongdoer
http://dict.leo.org/#/search=wrongdoersearchLoc=0resultOrder=basicmultiwordShowSingle=on.
Shame
on me ;)
Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2015 15:36:21 UTC+1 schrieb Domingos Coelho:
In the book is written the following: ...used to do clean up *when
resources expire*. FileEngine uses this to *delete files containing
expired content*. (
http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/core-libraries/caching.html#CacheEngine::gc
)
If the content is not expired, the file stay in the cache
Em quarta-feira, 18 de fevereiro de 2015 02:47:29 UTC-4, LDSign escreveu:
Hi
Ive set up a cache config as follow:
Cache::config('file', array(
'engine' = 'File',
'prefix' = false,
'duration' = '+10 minutes',
'path' = CACHE . 'files' . DS,
));
After writing to this cache config I call
Cache::gc('file');
But this does...nothing :( The files stay in the cache.
Am I missing someting or why does this not work?
Its Cake 2.6.1
Thanks,
Frank
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
CacheEngine and garbage collection
Hi
Ive set up a cache config as follow:
Cache::config('file', array(
'engine' = 'File',
'prefix' = false,
'duration' = '+10 minutes',
'path' = CACHE . 'files' . DS,
));
After writing to this cache config I call
Cache::gc('file');
But this does...nothing :( The files stay in the cache.
Am I missing someting or why does this not work?
Its Cake 2.6.1
Thanks,
Frank
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Use function in controller AND view
Just one question in addition. The cookbook says If you need NumberHelper http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/core-libraries/helpers/number.html#NumberHelper functionalities outside of a View, use the CakeNumber class: Whats the point using CakeNumber:: inside of views instead of $this-Number? Is this just a style quqstion or has it any drawbacks? Thanks, Frank Am Montag, 22. Dezember 2014 16:06:23 UTC+1 schrieb LDSign: Hi Ive a function which converts a number to currency value (e.g. 10 - 10,00 EUR). So far I have a custom TextHelper with that method within (becuase its view related). The problem is, now I need this (exactly same) method in a controller (for generating a flash message). Of course I could place this as a simple function in bootstrap.php (and use it in both, controller and view), but as far as I remember this is bad practice. Bad practice too is to clone this functionality in a component for DRY reasons. So whats the best practice for such a case? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Use function in controller AND view
Hi Ive a function which converts a number to currency value (e.g. 10 - 10,00 EUR). So far I have a custom TextHelper with that method within (becuase its view related). The problem is, now I need this (exactly same) method in a controller (for generating a flash message). Of course I could place this as a simple function in bootstrap.php (and use it in both, controller and view), but as far as I remember this is bad practice. Bad practice too is to clone this functionality in a component for DRY reasons. So whats the best practice for such a case? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Use function in controller AND view
Damn, classic not seeing the wood for the trees. Solutions are often so
close! Thanks :)
Am Dienstag, 23. Dezember 2014 01:12:09 UTC+1 schrieb euromark:
That's why we refactored the whole thing into a lib class:
https://github.com/cakephp/cakephp/blob/master/lib/Cake/Utility/CakeNumber.php
App::uses('CakeNumber', 'Utility');
$formattedNumber = CakeNumber::currency($value, $currency);
It is documented quite thorougly, by the way:
http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/core-utility-libraries/number.html#CakeNumber::currency
Mark
Am Montag, 22. Dezember 2014 16:06:23 UTC+1 schrieb LDSign:
Hi
Ive a function which converts a number to currency value (e.g. 10 -
10,00 EUR).
So far I have a custom TextHelper with that method within (becuase its
view related).
The problem is, now I need this (exactly same) method in a controller
(for generating a flash message). Of course I could place this as a simple
function in bootstrap.php (and use it in both, controller and view), but as
far as I remember this is bad practice. Bad practice too is to clone this
functionality in a component for DRY reasons.
So whats the best practice for such a case?
Thanks,
Frank
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Handling pagination past the end of the result set
Hi
Ive done this in Cake 2.5. Ive put all the pagination logic into a
component and there is one function which checks for last page:
// Check if results are outside the current page stored in session (to
prevent NotFound error)
private function __checkLastPage($conditions = array(),$contain = array())
{
$count =
$this-Controller-{$this-modelClass}-find('count',array('conditions' =
$conditions,'contain' = $contain));
$lastPage = ceil($count / Configure::read('Config.paginateLimit'));
if (empty($lastPage)) {
$lastPage = 1;
}
if (empty($this-Controller-request-params['named']['page'])) {
$this-Controller-request-params['named']['page'] = 1;
}
if ($lastPage $this-Controller-request-params['named']['page']) {
$this-Controller-request-params['named']['page'] = $lastPage;
}
}
This should give you an idea. Have fun!
Frank
Am Samstag, 1. November 2014 17:20:05 UTC+1 schrieb Rob Cowie:
Hi all, and have added filtering code to my app (cakephp3) and all is
great. The only problem I have is catching when the results set gives us
less pages than the user is on (ie, user sets a filter whilst on page 9,
but the resulting set only fills 3 pages). I am catching the exception, but
do not know the correct way to change the page I am going to display in the
controller. can any one help?
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Get aco path/fragments from url
Hi I have modified/extended the Html-link() helper method to check if an acl permission is set or not (to return the link or null from the link() method). This works nicely with Router::parse and Inflector::camelize if the url-string (or array) follows cake naming convention. But unfortunatley if there is a custom route set, the parse method returns the fragments of the aliases of course. How do I get the real controller/plugin/action names from a url (string or array) given? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Order using Containable-Behaviour on deeper levels (1)
Hi This was discussed several times on the inet - it seems that it is not possible to use an order on a deeper association connected with the containable behaviour, because the behaviour splits the query in several parts :( Whats the best approach to make sorting on deeper levels work with containable? Ive found an older behaviour called Linkable which promised to fill this gap, but unfortunatley it doesn't work with cake 2.5 :( Thanks for your input! Regards, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Order using Containable-Behaviour on deeper levels (1)
Thanks. Ive already looked at the Hash::sort method. But with that it is not possible to sort on multiple fields in priority. e.g. first lastname than firstname Or do I miss something? Frank Am Donnerstag, 29. Mai 2014 12:41:00 UTC+2 schrieb Jeremy Burns: Look at Hash::sort - http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/core-utility-libraries/hash.html#Hash::sort On 29 May 2014, at 11:28, LDSign fr...@lamozik.de javascript: wrote: Hi This was discussed several times on the inet - it seems that it is not possible to use an order on a deeper association connected with the containable behaviour, because the behaviour splits the query in several parts :( Whats the best approach to make sorting on deeper levels work with containable? Ive found an older behaviour called Linkable which promised to fill this gap, but unfortunatley it doesn't work with cake 2.5 :( Thanks for your input! Regards, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+u...@googlegroups.com javascript:. To post to this group, send email to cake...@googlegroups.comjavascript: . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Order using Containable-Behaviour on deeper levels (1)
Yehaw! It seems running Hash::Sort multiple times in the opposite direction one would do in a normal query solves exaclty this task :) Hope, it doesnt have any drawbacks... ;) Regards, Frank Am Donnerstag, 29. Mai 2014 12:55:57 UTC+2 schrieb LDSign: Thanks. Ive already looked at the Hash::sort method. But with that it is not possible to sort on multiple fields in priority. e.g. first lastname than firstname Or do I miss something? Frank Am Donnerstag, 29. Mai 2014 12:41:00 UTC+2 schrieb Jeremy Burns: Look at Hash::sort - http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/core-utility-libraries/hash.html#Hash::sort On 29 May 2014, at 11:28, LDSign fr...@lamozik.de wrote: Hi This was discussed several times on the inet - it seems that it is not possible to use an order on a deeper association connected with the containable behaviour, because the behaviour splits the query in several parts :( Whats the best approach to make sorting on deeper levels work with containable? Ive found an older behaviour called Linkable which promised to fill this gap, but unfortunatley it doesn't work with cake 2.5 :( Thanks for your input! Regards, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+u...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Exclude prefix (e.g. admin) from cacheAction globally
Hi CacheAction allows us to set the actions which should be cached after setting Cahce.check to true. So far so good. But is it possible to disable caching for a special prefix so say cache all actions except for those which have the prefix admin? This will be a big increase in maintance in my special case, because only the backend (=admin) requires dynamic generation (=no caching)? Or is there any other approach? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Tree / parent name (from parent_id) as virtual field
Hi Ive tried to set up a virtual field in the model to get the parent_name of a normal tree in cake. No luck so far :( Here is the query Ive tried: public $virtualFields = array( 'parent_name' = 'SELECT Category.name FROM categories as Category WHERE Category.id = Category.parent_id NULL LIMIT 1' ); I know the virtualField attribute accepts standard SQL-queries, but this does not work. Could you give me a hint? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Set title_for_layout in controller or view?
Hi Sure, the title could be set in the controller and/or in the view. But what is the best practice regarding coding standards and the MVC pattern? The docs are not clear at this point. What do you think? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Set title_for_layout in controller or view?
Thanks. But any reason for this? I would have guessed the title is more related to the view than to the controller... Frank Am Montag, 17. Februar 2014 09:25:59 UTC+1 schrieb perumal: Hi, The best practice well be setting title in controller. Regards, Perumal S On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:54 PM, LDSign fr...@lamozik.de javascript: wrote: Hi Sure, the title could be set in the controller and/or in the view. But what is the best practice regarding coding standards and the MVC pattern? The docs are not clear at this point. What do you think? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+u...@googlegroups.com javascript:. To post to this group, send email to cake...@googlegroups.comjavascript:. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Complex fluid user/company structure
Hi Just for brainstorming ;) Think of the following structure: #1: Company 1 (e.g. administration house) Company 2 (e.g. managers) Company 3 (e.g. regular company) Company 4 (e.g. subsidiary of a company) #2: Users ...with roles (ACL controlled) which belong to a certain company above. These could (!) have relations in between. So User 1 could be a manager of User 2 at every point of the structure a.s.o. Unfortunatly this layout is fluid :( So there could be more or less levels of companies as shown above. Each user of a specified company-level should only see and manage his users down below the tree. Tree! Hooray! That comes first to my mind, but could this thing be achieved with the build-in TreeBehaviour, so I could keep queries simple and straight-forward? e.g. searching for a specified company will give all (!) related users (and data) of all related companies down the structure? And to make this complete, users (whit ACL rights) can manage (edit/create) a company down the tree again. What do you think? I need a push into the right direction ;) Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Layout question - adding a class to a wrapper div
Hi
I always put this to my layout body:
body class=?php echo $this-params-controller ?
So I am ready to call each rendered controller separately via css. Sure,
you could also add $this-params-action to have finer granulation :)
Cheers,
Frank
Am Freitag, 6. Dezember 2013 18:26:50 UTC+1 schrieb Dave M.:
Let's say I have a default layout containing this body (overly-simplified):
div id=wrapper
div id=nav
!-- some nav stuff --
/div
div id=content
?php echo $this-fetch('content'); ?
/div
/div
I have a need to add a class to the wrapper id for a couple of pages on my
site.
It seems like creating a new layout is overkill for just one minor
addition when everything inside the wrapper div is the same.
Any ideas on how to accomplish this?
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Quick way to wrap input[type=radio] in label tags?
Hi Have a look at the form helper options ( http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/core-libraries/helpers/form.html). Using format, after,before and between even complex wrapping is possible. Ive used this in combination of an extended FormHelper to make the markup for bootstrap (including errors, tooltips a.s.o.), but staying as close to the core as possible. Cheers! Frank Am Dienstag, 18. Juni 2013 06:25:33 UTC+2 schrieb OJ Tibi - @ojtibi: Good day, folks! I was wondering if there was any quick option of making label tags wrap the inputs they're associated with, instead of sitting beside the input itself (e.g., labels for radio buttons generated by FormHelper-input() or FormHelper-radio() don't actually wrap the radio buttons they're associated with). Reason I'm asking this is that certain front-end frameworks like ZURB Foundation require labels to wrap radio buttons for the Custom Form features to work. Cheers, OJ -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Switch validation set within model?
Hi I would liket to switch a complete validation set for a model (in the controller). Deeper levels of the application requires more and more user data, so I had the idea to define multiple validation sets within the models for each level. Best solution will be an automatic switch for a specified action. Ive already searched a litte and found this: http://php.dzone.com/news/cakephp-12-multiple-validation Unfortunatley this is for Cake 1.2 - does anyone have a working solution for 2.3.6? Or is there a better approach of doing this? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
File download from Soap Resonse (binary from xml)
Hi Ive a working soapclient now. So far so good :) In the response I am getting a binary string as a object (php5 Soapclient class). NowI would like to extract this binary-object and offer a option to display or download it. What is the best way to do this with cake? I have already tried the build in response class. But it seems this will need to have the file in the file system first (needs path setting in the cookbook example). I am glad to avoid this. Could you provide a short example how to do this? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Best practice: Record associated to one or all
Hi What is the best practice to store records which are either related to one parent OR to all parents? Related to one is clear (set parent_id to id), but which method is the better approach: Set parent_id to 0 to make the record available to all parents or set it to null and make a global switch (tinyint 0/1)? In real life a document can belong to one company OR (not at the same time) to all companies. What would you do? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Best place for a SoapClient?
Hi I am trying to include a really complex php5 SoapClient interface with tons of objects and methods in my cake app. What do you think is the best place for the code? Controller, component, model or a DBSource? The code must not be reusable, because its very specific. Thank you for pushing me into the right direction, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Confused about routing
Hi
I am trying to make a special route, but had no success so far. Could you
help?
The url looks like:
/products/:category_slug/:product_slug
So, when product_slug isnt specified I would like to use
array('controller' = 'categories','action' = 'index')
and in the other case (when product_slug is specified):
array('controller' = 'products','action' = 'index')
For example:
/products/category_a should point to /categories/index/category_a
and (note the same category_slug)
/products/category_a/product_a should point to
/products/index/category_a/product_a
Is this possible and could you provide an example?
Thank you very much,
Frank
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Check if permission is inherited
Hi Thanks for your answer. I was hoping that there is a internal function in Acl to accomplish this. Do you have a code example for a custom function to check inheritance? Regards, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Check if permission is inherited
Hi Acl-check() only returns if a permission is granted or not. Is there a way to check (for a single element) if the permission is directly granted/denied or just inherited? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Extract path from multidimensional (threaded) array
Hi I am not sure if this is directly related to cake. But I think the Hash class could do the job. I have already fiddled around with it, but with no success :( I would like to transform a multidimensional array to a path syntax in a most simple way. Please look at the example input array attached as a txt-file. The resulting flat array should look like this: Array ( [0] = controllers [1] = controllers/Actions [2] = controllers/Actions/admin_index [3] = controllers/Actions/admin_edit [4] = controllers/Actions/admin_inline [5] = controllers/Agents [6] = controllers/Agents/register [7] = controllers/Agents/admin_verify [8] = controllers/Agents/admin_index [9] = controllers/Applications [10] = controllers/Applications/pension [11] = controllers/AclManager [12] = controllers/AclManager/Acl [13] = controllers/AclManager/Acl/admin_drop [14] = controllers/AclManager/Acl/admin_drop_perms ) The input array could have many children - it is not predictable how deep the array actually is. I am sure this could be achieved with a single line of code, but I don't know how. You? Thank you very much, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. Array ( [0] = Array ( [Aco] = Array ( [alias] = controllers ) [children] = Array ( [0] = Array ( [Aco] = Array [alias] = Actions ) [children] = Array ( [0] = Array ( [Aco] = Array [alias] = admin_index ) ) [1] = Array ( [Aco] = Array ( [alias] = admin_edit ) ) [2] = Array ( [Aco] = Array ( [alias] = admin_inline ) ) ) ) [1] = Array ( [Aco] = Array ( [alias] = Agents ) [children] = Array ( [0] = Array ( [Aco] = Array ( [alias] = register ) ) [1] = Array ( [Aco] = Array ( [alias] = admin_verify ) ) [2] = Array ( [Aco] = Array ( [alias] = admin_index ) ) ) ) [2] = Array ( [Aco] = Array ( [alias] = Applications
CakePHP 2.3.0: Bug in CacheEngine?
Hi Related to my post below I have switched from File to APC Cache. Read and write commands to the APC-Cache work like expected. But when I use clear() and clearGroup() nothing happens. I have digged a little deeper and put some debug info in the related FileEngine.php and ApcEngine.php. Result: The functions (clear clearGroup) in ApcEngine.php are never used - instead the ones of the FileEngine.php are used. Its clear, that this does not work. Is this a bug? Ive debugged the $engine-variable in core.php. It is Apc like it should - File isn't used at all anymore in my app. Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Cache::clearGroup in model and component building cache again
Hi
I have ran into a problem which drives me crazy :(
Ive a component which is used on every page to build the navigation for
every individual user. The navigation is database driven so caching is a
good idea - so far so good
The cache is built in the startup-callback of the component like so
(package and agent is just an example):
public function initialize(Controller $controller) {
parent::initialize($controller);
$package = Cache::read($this-Auth-user('id'),'packages');
if (!$package) {
$agent = ClassRegistry::init('Agent')-find('first',array('conditions' =
array('Agent.id' = $this-Auth-user('Company.agent_id';
if (!empty($agent)) {
Cache::write($this-Auth-user('id'), $agent['Package'],'packages');
}
}
}
This works as expected (if the cache file does not exist it would be
generated).
Now, I would like to push the creation of the cache manually when a
data-change happens. So Ive put an afterSave-callback in the model:
public function afterSave($created) {
Cache::clearGroup('packages');
}
This works too if I test this seperatly. But when I use this together
with the component-callback I will get an error-message:
*Warning* (2):
unlink(C:\xampp\htdocs\ebsst\tmp\cache\packages\ebsst_package_73): Permission
denied [*CORE\Cake\Cache\Engine\FileEngine.php*, line *368*]
The cache-file is not cleared though. I guess the file is locked by the
file-system (Xampp on Windows 7) through the component. I am not sure about the
order of these callbacks and how they interfere between models and components.
So ive tried different callbacks in both - but no luck.
Do you have a hint to solve this problem or is this a complete false approach?
Thanks,
Frank
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Cache::clearGroup in model and component building cache again
Just one addition: The unlink-error is the same when I use the
AutoCache-Plugin instead of the component-logic above...
On Feb 26, 6:50 pm, LDSign fr...@lamozik.de wrote:
Hi
I have ran into a problem which drives me crazy :(
Ive a component which is used on every page to build the navigation for
every individual user. The navigation is database driven so caching is a
good idea - so far so good
The cache is built in the startup-callback of the component like so
(package and agent is just an example):
public function initialize(Controller $controller) {
parent::initialize($controller);
$package = Cache::read($this-Auth-user('id'),'packages');
if (!$package) {
$agent = ClassRegistry::init('Agent')-find('first',array('conditions' =
array('Agent.id' = $this-Auth-user('Company.agent_id';
if (!empty($agent)) {
Cache::write($this-Auth-user('id'), $agent['Package'],'packages');
}
}
}
This works as expected (if the cache file does not exist it would be
generated).
Now, I would like to push the creation of the cache manually when a
data-change happens. So Ive put an afterSave-callback in the model:
public function afterSave($created) {
Cache::clearGroup('packages');
}
This works too if I test this seperatly. But when I use this together
with the component-callback I will get an error-message:
*Warning* (2):
unlink(C:\xampp\htdocs\ebsst\tmp\cache\packages\ebsst_package_73): Permission
denied [*CORE\Cake\Cache\Engine\FileEngine.php*, line *368*]
The cache-file is not cleared though. I guess the file is locked by the
file-system (Xampp on Windows 7) through the component. I am not sure about
the order of these callbacks and how they interfere between models and
components. So ive tried different callbacks in both - but no luck.
Do you have a hint to solve this problem or is this a complete false approach?
Thanks,
Frank
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Model relations (optional level)
Hi Thank you both for your answers :) @Yvon: It will be choice 1 - every subsidiary is unique to a company. But I am not sure what you actually mean in your solution for this case (why a parent_id?). @Jermeny: The tree behaviour seems exaclty to do what I am looking for. Hopefully this does not complicate the queries/finds Ive already built. Usally all actions in my app are and will be on company-level. The (optional) subsidiary-relation is only for statistic purposes (and to run grouping operations). Thanks again, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Model relations (optional level)
Hi I am not sure how to give this thread a clear title or topic. But let me explain what I am trying to do (or find the best and right practice for this approch). Think of 3 tables: Users, companies and subsidiaries. Users always belong to a company but they could (!) belong to subsidiary which is itself related to a company. So there are 2 constellations: Company - Users Company - Subsidiaries - Users The relation between a company and a subsidiary is clear. But what is the best approach for storing the user relation? Set both company_id + subsidiary_id in the user model although subsidiary_id has already a relation to a company? This could lead into illogical data, if the relation between company and subsidiary has changed. Or leaving company_id empty in that case and only setting the subsidiary_id? In the other case leave subsidiary_id empty if a user belongs directly to a company. What do you think? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Best practice to call cake schema update without shell
The hoster is 11 (Business Pro Shared Host). Ive already tried accessing the shell via ssh, but it seems Ive no right for that. I would like to call cake schema update on a scheme I have uploaded to the production/presentation server which is currently in testing state (so db changes are common). In an optimum way, I would to migrate the db within the admin-interface with a simple click. Do you have any hint how I could accomplish this on the given 11 host? Thanks, Frank On Jan 29, 10:51 am, euromark dereurom...@gmail.com wrote: It can. If you got sufficient rights to do that (executable rights for this user - www-data probably). But I am not sure if thats a very good idea. Why not providing shell access here? Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2013 05:59:51 UTC+1 schrieb LDSign: Hi I would like to call a shell command on a prdouction server without shell access. Whats the best practice of doing that? Can a shell- command being called from a controller? Thank you, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Best practice to call cake schema update without shell
Hi I would like to call a shell command on a prdouction server without shell access. Whats the best practice of doing that? Can a shell- command being called from a controller? Thank you, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Any way to check url before redirect?
Hi I am searching for a way in cake to check an url before it is called (via redirect). Real world: The user could set a custom start page to which he is redirect after login. This page is mapped to / all the time too. So far so good :) Unfortunately it is not predictable that this page is available in the future (deleted or just because he has no rights to access this page anymore). Of course this results in an error or even worse in a redirect loop. What I like to do is to check the given url for accessibility and if it is not available redirect the user to a default page (which is always accessible). Can this be achieved with cake? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
Re: Any way to check url before redirect?
Thank you :) Thats a good starting point, but how do I check there if the redirect will be successfull? Frank On Jan 25, 11:48 am, euromark dereurom...@gmail.com wrote: Use a component and its beforeRedirect() callback see the docs for more infos, but basically you can intercept the redirect this way. Am Freitag, 25. Januar 2013 11:28:37 UTC+1 schrieb LDSign: Hi I am searching for a way in cake to check an url before it is called (via redirect). Real world: The user could set a custom start page to which he is redirect after login. This page is mapped to / all the time too. So far so good :) Unfortunately it is not predictable that this page is available in the future (deleted or just because he has no rights to access this page anymore). Of course this results in an error or even worse in a redirect loop. What I like to do is to check the given url for accessibility and if it is not available redirect the user to a default page (which is always accessible). Can this be achieved with cake? Thanks, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
Restrict access to records for certain groups / control by acl
Hi I am using ACL to control access for groups and users to different actions. Now I would like to extend this behaviour to record level. Think of 3 groups: Users, agents and administrators. The model for restricted access is company for example (in real life there are much more like documents a.s.o) Admins should have CRUD access to all companies application wide, agents only to the ones which have an corresponding agent_id and users have no admin control at all (easy because of acl). So far so good. I could hack every controller to find out which companies are allowed, but I think this is not really the MVC/DRY way, because there are many models which share this behaviour. Could you point me into the right direction? Next: I would like to give the decision if a user could access all records or only his own ones in the hand of acl. Ive made to methods for this (in the corresponding controller - here companies): admin_all and admin_own which returns a list of all valid ids. These methods/acos are easily integrated into acl. Is this the right approach? Hope that Ive explained my problem good enough - not so easy for me in english ;) Thank you, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
Best practice for naming ACOs in Cake?
Hi Ive implemented a complete ACL-Solution in my app. I am using an administration form for acl-management (allow/deny) which I am building directly on-the-fly (from the aco-table). So now, I would like to make this acl-form accessible to some groups with non-technical knowledge. Of course displaying the default method aliases to the user is not so self-explanatory for everyone. I would like to add a real name and a description. What do you think were I should store this information for the aco? Modifying/extend the cake aco-table? Or in a related table? Which is most cake-like? In an optimum way the description and the name is related to the translateable behaviour to offer different languages. Has somebody done this already? Thanks for your input! Regards, Frank -- Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
Re: Translate behaviour / Save multiple languages at once
Hi
Thanks - you pushed me in the right direction :)
$this-Yourmodel-locale = false;
as you suggested produces an array_merge error. But using
$this-Yourmodel-locale = array('deu','eng');
will exactly do what I want when adding a new record (in combination
with the two form elements).
But this runs into the next problem: In the edit-action only the
translated original field will be populated with the request-data -
whatever I set as locale. What wrongs here?
Literally this behaviour drives me crazy. But Ive not given up yet ;)
Regards,
Frank
On Dec 24, 3:10 am, matthieu.ri...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hey
The translate behaviour seems to be quite bad documented.
If you want to work with it correctly, you've to mind to set the locale
attribute:
$this-Yourmodel-locale = false; //storing multiple languages at once
$this-Yourmodel-locale = null; //will use the locale in your conf
$this-Yourmodel-locale = 'any string you that you makes happy';//custom
one
if you save or retrieve the data you've to set that attribute!
greetz
Am Samstag, 1. Dezember 2012 16:29:56 UTC+1 schrieb LDSign:
Hi
Ive searched for several hours now and unfortunatly the translate
behaviour does not work as expected. I try to save multiple translation
fields at once like so:
echo $this-Form-adminText('name.deu',__('Name german'));
echo $this-Form-adminText('name.eng',__('Name english'));
My controller (save)action is unmodified from the one baked. In the model
Ive correctly included the translate behaviour:
public $actsAs = array('Translate' = array('name'));
Cake-Version is 2.2.3
So what happens? I expect that the two name fields would be saved to the
i18n table under their corresponding langauge after transmitting the form.
But instead of this only the (actual) language stored in the session will
be used...so only one language-entry is added to the i18n table and the
other language will be completly ignored.
After searching the net several people had success with the approach shown
above, but on my side it doesn't work. What I am doing wrong? Is this a bug?
Thank you for your help.
Greetings,
Frank
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
Translate behaviour / Save multiple languages at once
Hi
Ive searched for several hours now and unfortunatly the translate behaviour
does not work as expected. I try to save multiple translation fields at
once like so:
echo $this-Form-adminText('name.deu',__('Name german'));
echo $this-Form-adminText('name.eng',__('Name english'));
My controller (save)action is unmodified from the one baked. In the model
Ive correctly included the translate behaviour:
public $actsAs = array('Translate' = array('name'));
Cake-Version is 2.2.3
So what happens? I expect that the two name fields would be saved to the
i18n table under their corresponding langauge after transmitting the form.
But instead of this only the (actual) language stored in the session will
be used...so only one language-entry is added to the i18n table and the
other language will be completly ignored.
After searching the net several people had success with the approach shown
above, but on my side it doesn't work. What I am doing wrong? Is this a bug?
Thank you for your help.
Greetings,
Frank
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
Asset filtering CakePHP 2.0.5 / css.php not included anymore?
Hi there I've tried to enable the CSS asset filtering in CakePHP 2.0.5, but it doesn't work. csspp is placed in vendors. It seems the required file css.php in the webroot-dir is missing. Any hints? Or has the scheme changed in 2.0? Thank you, Frank -- Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials http://tv.cakephp.org Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php
find('list') - 'fields'-parameter in model?
Hi
Is it possible to move the fields-parameter for find('list') into the
model so it can be used with every find('list') command?
Thanks,
Frank
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words
REMOVE ME as the subject.
Tree behaviour when parent is in other table?
Hi I use the tree behaviour mainly for sorting items (with moveup/ movedown). These items have their parents in an other table (foreign key). The parent_id from the tree will be left null. Of course this will make some trouble when moving the items around. How could I tell CakePHP to look for a parent_id in a other table? Think of it like an user/group relation with two tables. Each user belongs to only one group. Now I would like to move the user user up and down in an automagic way... Thanks, Frank Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: Tree behaviour when parent is in other table?
Hi Thank you for your help. Regarding to the user/group-relation: I would like to move a user up and down in ONE specified group. There are users in other groups for example which should not interfer with this particular reorder-action. Example: User, Group, lft, right UserA, GroupA, 1, 2 UserB, GroupA, 2, 3 UserC, GroupB, 3, 4 UserD, GroupA, 4, 5 Now here is the problem: If I would like to move UserD between UserA and UserB, I've to skip UserC in any way. If the parents are in the same table, the situation is clear (handled by Cake) but here Cake does not know UserC belongs to another branch. Of course it won't ;) Should I try to make dummy-parents and exclude them from any queries ? Or is this ugly? Thank you again, Frank On Mar 15, 6:03 pm, Jon Bennett jmbenn...@gmail.com wrote: Think of it like an user/group relation with two tables. Each user belongs to only one group. Now I would like to move the user user up and down in an automagic way... Ahh! ok, in that case, you've gone about it slightly the wrong way. Your User model isn't a tree, teh groups ahh. You don't move the user around the tree, you change the group that user belongs to. You can then change the position of a group till your hearts content. J -- jon bennett -www.jben.net- blog.jben.net Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: Tree behaviour when parent is in other table?
Thats exactly why I seperated these things into two tables. They don't belong together in a semantical manner. User/group is only an example, but it shows what I mean. To make it clear. Table A - Item 1 + Table B - Item 1 + Table B - Item 2 + Table B - Item 3 Table A- Item 2 + Table B - Item 1 + Table B - Item 2 + Table B - Item 3 a.s.o. Having a look at my second post...how can I reorder the items of Table B in its own branch? On Mar 15, 9:15 pm, Jon Bennett jmbenn...@gmail.com wrote: hi, Thank you for your help. Regarding to the user/group-relation: I would like to move a user up and down in ONE specified group. There are users in other groups for example which should not interfer with this particular reorder-action. Example: User, Group, lft, right UserA, GroupA, 1, 2 UserB, GroupA, 2, 3 UserC, GroupB, 3, 4 UserD, GroupA, 4, 5 Now here is the problem: If I would like to move UserD between UserA and UserB, I've to skip UserC in any way. If the parents are in the same table, the situation is clear (handled by Cake) but here Cake does not know UserC belongs to another branch. Of course it won't ;) Should I try to make dummy-parents and exclude them from any queries ? Or is this ugly? I think things are rather complicated at the mo. Semantically, how can a user also be a group? If you remove groups entirely, and say that a user that has children is a 'group', doesn't your problem go away? Cheers, J -- jon bennett -www.jben.net- blog.jben.net Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
CakePHP Auth-component in AppController
Hi Ive implemented the login-logic with help of Auth. This works fine. But I would like to have auth all over my site. So I would like to include this component to the AppController (for global access). As soon as I do so, the site stops working. The page will load for some seconds and then there comes blank page with a redirect-error (sorry Ive this only in german): Diese Webseite weist eine Weiterleitung auf. Die Webseite unter http://localhost/ben/users/login hat zu viele Umleitungen erzeugt. Das Löschen Ihrer Cookies für diese Website oder das Zulassen von Drittanbieter-Cookies könnte das Problem möglicherweise beheben. Sollte das Problem damit nicht behoben sein, liegt möglicherweise ein Serverkonfigurationsfehler und kein Problem mit Ihrem Computer vor. This drives my nuts. Do you have any hint? Until now Ive thought that when I move my components from the (sub-)controller to the AppController that this doesnt make any change execpt for accessing it globally. I use cakePHP 1.3 - latest beta. Are there any known issues? Thank you, Frank Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
