Re: does cake do mysql_escape automagically?

2008-09-24 Thread The Mullet

If you use the model functions for CRUD: Yes it does. See
DboSource::create, which will put all data through value(), which does
the escaping in a way which is appropriate to the database you use.

If you use use model::query  for your statements,  you'll have to use
the Sanitize class to clean your query.

Torsten

On 24 Sep., 10:04, rocket [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I was wondering if cake1.19 does does this mysql_escape automagically?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Cake Recipes cancelled

2007-03-11 Thread The Mullet

 @Mullet
 Trademark and Copyright are two seperate issues. The MIT license
 covers the copyright on the code.

gwoo, I would like to cite your very words from another thread:

But you cannot use the CakePHP logo or name to promote your web
development company or your services, unless you are a certified
CakePHP Engineer.

This basically means, that you intended to keep me from using the term
CakePHP, thus violating fair use rules on trademarks. Now, how can I
offer a download for CakePHP, if you forbid me the use of the word
CakePHP (remeber that the sources themself carry the word CakrPHP
all over)? Obviously, your legal position is wrong, and it did violate
the MIT license by restricting my right to redistribute the sources.

Fortunately, you decided to set up a fair use policy. I am glad this
issue can finally be closed after that.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake 
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Cake Recipes cancelled

2007-03-09 Thread The Mullet

On 9 Mrz., 06:56, Larry E. Masters aka PhpNut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  An allied question - Will an Unofficial book be allowed by CSF?

 If you mean will someone be able to use CakePHP in the title of a book
 without permission, then I will say no.
 CakePHP is trademark of the Cake Software Foundation, Inc.

Larry, you cannot forbid anyone to write a book _ABOUT_ Cakephp, and
it would definately be allowed to use the name even in the title, as
long as it does not claim to be an official book.

But legal issues aside: if what Larry says is representative of the
thinking that dominates the CSF, then, members of the community, be
careful. Thats because, if he thinks anyone needs his permission to
publish an _unofficial_ book containing the word CakePHP, how can
anyone be sure that he is allowed to write a CakePHP Blog? Or even a
website mentioning the Word CakePHP? Larry, will we be hearing from
your lawyers if we do so? What do you demand if I want to start a blog
which is named my unofficial CakePHP blog?

So, please Larry/CSF let us know, if we can safely assume that the
term CakePHP and its fair use are assured for the future - for free!-.
And please don't refer to the CSF website as it does not answer any
questions.

Should you stick to your position that the term CakePHP can be used
only with permission of CSF, I must strongly recommend everyone to
switch to another framework, because I must fear that would be the
beginning of an alienated community.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake 
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Cake Recipes cancelled

2007-03-09 Thread The Mullet

Tarique is exactly right:
The term CakePHP is trademarked so you can be prevented from using
that for almost everything (including blog posts) *if* CSF wishes.

It is this ambiguity from CSF which I do not like.

Now, unless CSF decides to set up a public license which allows for
some basic use of the Name, CakePHP is unusable in a commercial
environment. Actually, right now CSF is even violating the MIT license
under which Cake is published: the MIT license allows for
redistribution of the Software, which I can't though, as the software
contains the word CakePHP all over, but I am not allowed to use this
word.

Now, to make this clear: I have total understanding if the CSF wants
to protect themselves against anyone who might abuse the term CakePHP
by giving the impression that he is certified, or his book is an
official Cake-Book or whatsoever. But a simple use of the word
CakePHP, stating My Company has used the CakePHP framework in so many
projects should be allowed.

Once again:
ACME is an officially licensed CakePHP-company should be forbidden
unless licensed by CSF.

ACME has produced software using the CakePHP framework should be
allowed.

CSF should provide such a statement with every copy of CakePHP. Unless
they do so, no company should seriously consider investing time in
this framework, because tomorrow CSF may decide it's time to cash in.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake 
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---