New CakePHP, CodeIgniter, Zend Framework and Ruby on Rails Benchmark

2008-07-01 Thread DragonI

Ekerete of AVNet Labs has performed PHP framework comparison
benchmarks http://www.avnetlabs.com/php/php-framework-comparison-benchmarks.

Cake performance - request per second aren't pretty. CakePHP
1.2.0.7125 rc1 was used! debug set to 0 - file caching is used.

Anyway, read for yourself
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: New CakePHP, CodeIgniter, Zend Framework and Ruby on Rails Benchmark

2008-07-01 Thread John David Anderson

Two things to note:

1. He didn't use caching in any of the tests. This seems pretty silly,  
since almost *every* production website should be doing that.  
Essentially, if you're not planning on doing what you should be doing,  
you should be interested in these numbers.

2. His admitted CI preference and experience. Any wonder that CI  
magically appears at the top of every test?

-- John

On Jul 1, 2008, at 9:12 AM, DragonI wrote:


 Ekerete of AVNet Labs has performed PHP framework comparison
 benchmarks http://www.avnetlabs.com/php/php-framework-comparison-benchmarks 
 .

 Cake performance - request per second aren't pretty. CakePHP
 1.2.0.7125 rc1 was used! debug set to 0 - file caching is used.

 Anyway, read for yourself
 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: New CakePHP, CodeIgniter, Zend Framework and Ruby on Rails Benchmark

2008-07-01 Thread Nate

Also, he probably has no idea how to set up a Cake install.  He (and
you) would do well to refer to the benchmarks produced by Paul M.
Jones.

On Jul 1, 11:12 am, DragonI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ekerete of AVNet Labs has performed PHP framework comparison
 benchmarkshttp://www.avnetlabs.com/php/php-framework-comparison-benchmarks.

 Cake performance - request per second aren't pretty. CakePHP
 1.2.0.7125 rc1 was used! debug set to 0 - file caching is used.

 Anyway, read for yourself
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: New CakePHP, CodeIgniter, Zend Framework and Ruby on Rails Benchmark

2008-07-01 Thread Siegfried Hirsch

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:33 PM, John David Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Two things to note:
and one more question:

the pages_controller is overridden for the test. Could this be a problem ?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---