Re: RFC: cake deploy

2008-05-16 Thread Dardo Sordi Bogado

> you plan on deploying the actual app that you're in , or using a svn
> checkout at the remote machine (when using ssh) ?

It would be great if it's SCM agnostic or if support for different
SCMs could be plugged in (@Chris: I can make it support git :P ).

- Dardo Sordi.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: RFC: cake deploy

2008-05-16 Thread Marcin Domanski

generating index.php/test.php file for advanced layout etc ?

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:16 AM, francky06l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ability to switch to different cake version .. I use to have a "latest
> svn", a kind of "qa"  and a "production one" ..
> Tmp clean is also essential as well maybe as database choice..and
> debug mode.
>
> On May 16, 10:23 pm, "b logica" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Marcin Domanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > you hijacker!
>> >> I don't know that this is the best place for this question but it's
>> >> ~somewhat~ related. I'm looking for people's thoughts on extending
>> >> cake's i18n extract so that one can update existing .po files. Use
>> >> case: Extraction has taken place and a copy made for each locale and
>> >> sent off to the translator. Later, after they've been returned and
>> >> installed, a further extract call writes any new msgids to each
>> >> locale's .po file rather than (or, maybe including) a generic .pot
>> >> file. The .po files would also be backed up, of course. This would
>> >> make it much easier to update the files with new strings.
>>
>> > poedit - update catalog from pot file
>>
>> Thanks for the clue. I did think of poedit, but it hadn't occurred to
>> me that it would only update the files with those msgids that don't
>> already exist. Of course, it seems obvious now. I'll give that a go.
> >
>



-- 
Marcin Domanski
http://kabturek.info

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: RFC: cake deploy

2008-05-16 Thread francky06l

Ability to switch to different cake version .. I use to have a "latest
svn", a kind of "qa"  and a "production one" ..
Tmp clean is also essential as well maybe as database choice..and
debug mode.

On May 16, 10:23 pm, "b logica" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Marcin Domanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > you hijacker!
> >> I don't know that this is the best place for this question but it's
> >> ~somewhat~ related. I'm looking for people's thoughts on extending
> >> cake's i18n extract so that one can update existing .po files. Use
> >> case: Extraction has taken place and a copy made for each locale and
> >> sent off to the translator. Later, after they've been returned and
> >> installed, a further extract call writes any new msgids to each
> >> locale's .po file rather than (or, maybe including) a generic .pot
> >> file. The .po files would also be backed up, of course. This would
> >> make it much easier to update the files with new strings.
>
> > poedit - update catalog from pot file
>
> Thanks for the clue. I did think of poedit, but it hadn't occurred to
> me that it would only update the files with those msgids that don't
> already exist. Of course, it seems obvious now. I'll give that a go.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: RFC: cake deploy

2008-05-16 Thread b logica

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Marcin Domanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> you hijacker!
>> I don't know that this is the best place for this question but it's
>> ~somewhat~ related. I'm looking for people's thoughts on extending
>> cake's i18n extract so that one can update existing .po files. Use
>> case: Extraction has taken place and a copy made for each locale and
>> sent off to the translator. Later, after they've been returned and
>> installed, a further extract call writes any new msgids to each
>> locale's .po file rather than (or, maybe including) a generic .pot
>> file. The .po files would also be backed up, of course. This would
>> make it much easier to update the files with new strings.
>
> poedit - update catalog from pot file
>

Thanks for the clue. I did think of poedit, but it hadn't occurred to
me that it would only update the files with those msgids that don't
already exist. Of course, it seems obvious now. I'll give that a go.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: RFC: cake deploy

2008-05-16 Thread Marcin Domanski

Hey,
some basic toughts:
the ability to save/not save paswords
different configs (dev/live etc)
clearing tmp, chmoding
some possibility to plug into the whole process and add your own commands etc

you plan on deploying the actual app that you're in , or using a svn
checkout at the remote machine (when using ssh) ?

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Chris Hartjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi kids.


> I'm starting to get my notes together for creating a 'cake deploy'
> task, since I have become rather involved in application deployment as
> of late.
>
> In my mind right now I have two options:
>
> 'cake deploy config'
> - configure what options will be used for the deployment
>
> I envision you choosing between ssh and ftp, usernames and passwords,
> servers, source and destination.  That info will be stored in a file
> in APP/config.
>
> 'cake deploy'
> - pretty self explanatory
>
> Anyway, I would appreciate people's thoughts and comments on what they
> would like to see as part of 'cake deploy'.  Please keep in mind that
> I am under no obligation to accept any of your ideas. :)
>
> --
> Chris Hartjes
> Internet Loudmouth
> Motto for 2008: "Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes..."
> @TheKeyBoard: http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard
>
> >
>



-- 
Marcin Domanski
http://kabturek.info

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: RFC: cake deploy

2008-05-16 Thread Marcin Domanski

you hijacker!
> I don't know that this is the best place for this question but it's
> ~somewhat~ related. I'm looking for people's thoughts on extending
> cake's i18n extract so that one can update existing .po files. Use
> case: Extraction has taken place and a copy made for each locale and
> sent off to the translator. Later, after they've been returned and
> installed, a further extract call writes any new msgids to each
> locale's .po file rather than (or, maybe including) a generic .pot
> file. The .po files would also be backed up, of course. This would
> make it much easier to update the files with new strings.

poedit - update catalog from pot file


-- 
Marcin Domanski
http://kabturek.info

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: RFC: cake deploy

2008-05-16 Thread Samuel DeVore

One thing that would be nice to see is an option to clear out the tmp
subfolders (like caches/model, caches/view ...)  and likely making
sure the perms are still good on that directory.  I know that is
something when I was starting out that kept biting me in the butt.

Sam D

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:36 AM, b logica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> rsync --rsh might be nice to have as well. Also, the debug & error
> logs should be nulled. Oh, and permissions on the files & tmp
> directories might be a nice option--rather than opening them up with
> 777 I prefer to chgrp apache for them. I'm not sure how that would be
> best configured for deployment. Maybe that's best left for tidying up
> later.
>
> I don't know that this is the best place for this question but it's
> ~somewhat~ related. I'm looking for people's thoughts on extending
> cake's i18n extract so that one can update existing .po files. Use
> case: Extraction has taken place and a copy made for each locale and
> sent off to the translator. Later, after they've been returned and
> installed, a further extract call writes any new msgids to each
> locale's .po file rather than (or, maybe including) a generic .pot
> file. The .po files would also be backed up, of course. This would
> make it much easier to update the files with new strings.
>
> Of course, if this is already possible with Cake, please point that
> out to me :-\
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Chris Hartjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi kids.
>>
>> I'm starting to get my notes together for creating a 'cake deploy'
>> task, since I have become rather involved in application deployment as
>> of late.
>>
>> In my mind right now I have two options:
>>
>> 'cake deploy config'
>> - configure what options will be used for the deployment
>>
>> I envision you choosing between ssh and ftp, usernames and passwords,
>> servers, source and destination.  That info will be stored in a file
>> in APP/config.
>>
>> 'cake deploy'
>> - pretty self explanatory
>>
>> Anyway, I would appreciate people's thoughts and comments on what they
>> would like to see as part of 'cake deploy'.  Please keep in mind that
>> I am under no obligation to accept any of your ideas. :)
>>
>> --
>> Chris Hartjes
>> Internet Loudmouth
>> Motto for 2008: "Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes..."
>> @TheKeyBoard: http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard
>>
>> >
>>
>
> >
>



-- 
-- 
(the old fart) the advice is free, the lack of crankiness will cost you

- its a fine line between a real question and an idiot

http://blog.samdevore.com/archives/2007/03/05/when-open-source-bugs-me/
http://blog.samdevore.com/cakephp-pages/my-cake-wont-bake/
http://blog.samdevore.com/cakephp-pages/i-cant-bake/

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: RFC: cake deploy

2008-05-16 Thread b logica

rsync --rsh might be nice to have as well. Also, the debug & error
logs should be nulled. Oh, and permissions on the files & tmp
directories might be a nice option--rather than opening them up with
777 I prefer to chgrp apache for them. I'm not sure how that would be
best configured for deployment. Maybe that's best left for tidying up
later.

I don't know that this is the best place for this question but it's
~somewhat~ related. I'm looking for people's thoughts on extending
cake's i18n extract so that one can update existing .po files. Use
case: Extraction has taken place and a copy made for each locale and
sent off to the translator. Later, after they've been returned and
installed, a further extract call writes any new msgids to each
locale's .po file rather than (or, maybe including) a generic .pot
file. The .po files would also be backed up, of course. This would
make it much easier to update the files with new strings.

Of course, if this is already possible with Cake, please point that
out to me :-\

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Chris Hartjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi kids.
>
> I'm starting to get my notes together for creating a 'cake deploy'
> task, since I have become rather involved in application deployment as
> of late.
>
> In my mind right now I have two options:
>
> 'cake deploy config'
> - configure what options will be used for the deployment
>
> I envision you choosing between ssh and ftp, usernames and passwords,
> servers, source and destination.  That info will be stored in a file
> in APP/config.
>
> 'cake deploy'
> - pretty self explanatory
>
> Anyway, I would appreciate people's thoughts and comments on what they
> would like to see as part of 'cake deploy'.  Please keep in mind that
> I am under no obligation to accept any of your ideas. :)
>
> --
> Chris Hartjes
> Internet Loudmouth
> Motto for 2008: "Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes..."
> @TheKeyBoard: http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



RFC: cake deploy

2008-05-16 Thread Chris Hartjes

Hi kids.

I'm starting to get my notes together for creating a 'cake deploy'
task, since I have become rather involved in application deployment as
of late.

In my mind right now I have two options:

'cake deploy config'
- configure what options will be used for the deployment

I envision you choosing between ssh and ftp, usernames and passwords,
servers, source and destination.  That info will be stored in a file
in APP/config.

'cake deploy'
- pretty self explanatory

Anyway, I would appreciate people's thoughts and comments on what they
would like to see as part of 'cake deploy'.  Please keep in mind that
I am under no obligation to accept any of your ideas. :)

-- 
Chris Hartjes
Internet Loudmouth
Motto for 2008: "Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes..."
@TheKeyBoard: http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---