Re: [Callers] Box circulate dances

2016-07-20 Thread John Sweeney via Callers
I would always include in the notation the fact that the balances for a Box
Circulate are MUCH more satisfying if they are Forward & Back - that sets
you up with the right momentum to cross the set. 

I really wish callers would specify the direction of every balance; for
instance if the next move is Allemande Left, then balancing Left/Right is
much better than Right/Left (which leaves you too close to the person you
are Allemanding).

Spinning as you cross the set in a Box Circulate is also fun, and much
easier to do if you have balanced Forward & Back.

:-)

Happy dancing,
John

John Sweeney, Dancer, England j...@modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent



Re: [Callers] Box circulate dances

2016-07-20 Thread Maia McCormick via Callers
I am in 85% agreement with John! But I like teaching box circ. balances in
particular as right+fwd and left+slightly back, so that EVERYONE (those
moving right and those moving forward) have momentum to carry them to where
they're going next. (I believe I got that one from Lisa Greenleaf...?)

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:03 AM, John Sweeney via Callers <
callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:

> I would always include in the notation the fact that the balances for a Box
> Circulate are MUCH more satisfying if they are Forward & Back - that sets
> you up with the right momentum to cross the set.
>
> I really wish callers would specify the direction of every balance; for
> instance if the next move is Allemande Left, then balancing Left/Right is
> much better than Right/Left (which leaves you too close to the person you
> are Allemanding).
>
> Spinning as you cross the set in a Box Circulate is also fun, and much
> easier to do if you have balanced Forward & Back.
>
> :-)
>
> Happy dancing,
> John
>
> John Sweeney, Dancer, England j...@modernjive.com 01233 625 362
> http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
>
> ___
> Callers mailing list
> Callers@lists.sharedweight.net
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>


Re: [Callers] Box circulate dances

2016-07-20 Thread Bob Isaacs via Callers
Hi All:
 
The dance Ron is referring to is:
 
Silent Partner
Becket-L, 4/4/15
 


A1.  8  L diagonal
circle L ¾


8  N1 swing



A2.  8  R and L through

2,6   Ladies
pull by R, partner allemande L 1¼ to long waves  (1)



B1.  4,4   Balance,
gents cross and ladies loop R to long waves(2)

4,4   Balance,
ladies cross and gents loop R to long waves(3)



B2.  4,4   Balance
R and L, slide/spin R

8  Partner
swing




This
way of combining box circulates and Rory spins is new, and it means partners
circulate in different boxes even though they start the waves together.


(1)
– With ladies facing out and gents facing in, partner in L and Sh1, the silent
partner, in R.

(2)
– With gents facing out and ladies facing in, N1 in R and N0 in L.


(3)
– With ladies facing out and gents facing in, Sh1 in R and Sh2 in L.



I also agree with John Sweeney that the circulate balances should be balanced 
forward and back - Bob Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:54:17 -0400
CC: callers@lists.sharedweight.net
Subject: Re: [Callers] Box circulate dances
From: callers@lists.sharedweight.net

If you feel like mixing Box Circulate with Rory, here are two I've written and 
called:
http://contradances.tumblr.com/post/117811884210/astral-navigation
http://contradances.tumblr.com/post/117812007820/playground-stomp
Bob Isaacs also has a really nice Rory/Box Circulate mix, which I don't have 
the notes for.